Changes in habitat use by a deep-diving predator in response to a coastal earthquake

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103226Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sperm whales responded to earthquake-triggered changes in a submarine canyon.

  • Surface intervals between dives increased by 25% for one year after the earthquake.

  • Return to pre-earthquake levels after one year suggested recovery of foraging efficiency.

  • Whales exhibited long-lasting changes in distribution of core foraging areas.

Abstract

Earthquakes can significantly impact ecosystem function and survivability of marine organisms, however their effect on marine predators remains unknown. In November 2016, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake triggered a ‘canyon flushing’ event in the submarine canyon of Kaikōura (New Zealand), a year-round foraging ground for sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus). Underwater landslips and turbidity currents caused significant changes to the seafloor and removed large quantities of benthic biomass from the canyon. To investigate the potential impact of the earthquake on habitat use by sperm whales, we used a multi-year dataset to quantify changes in their behaviour, foraging distribution and use of food resources before and after the earthquake. The diving locations and behaviour of individual whales were recorded during summer and winter from January 2014 to January 2018, and samples of sloughed skin were collected for bulk and amino acid specific stable isotope analyses. While blow rates remained unchanged, the mean surface interval between dives was 25% longer for about one year after the earthquake, potentially reflecting increased effort searching for prey. Stable isotope ratios of sperm whale skin provided no evidence for change in diet. However, significant changes in the distribution of core foraging areas indicated shifts in habitat use for at least one year, potentially driven by changes in the seafloor and prey availability following the canyon flushing. Overall, our observations suggested that the earthquake caused alterations in the foraging patterns of sperm whales over a period of at least 12 months. This was the first study to quantify the impact of an earthquake on a marine mammal population, providing new insights into how top predators react and adapt to large-scale events of natural disturbance.

Introduction

Extreme natural events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and volcanic eruptions are rare, but can profoundly impact ecosystems through modifications to habitat and mortality of plants and animals (Bell and Hall, 1994; Fraile-Nuez et al., 2012; Kitahashi et al., 2014). Knowledge of how animal populations respond to such events is important for understanding the ecological impacts of large-scale disturbances and the risks they pose to population viability. The effects of earthquakes on marine species, especially mobile organisms, are poorly understood. With the exception of observations of a fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) immediately following a 5.5 magnitude earthquake (Gallo-Reynoso et al., 2011), the effects on marine mammals are undocumented. Because earthquakes are infrequent and unpredictable, the opportunities to assess their impact on marine mammal populations are extremely rare.

In November 2016, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake hit Kaikōura, New Zealand, and was described as one of the most complex crustal earthquakes ever recorded (Hamling et al., 2017). Strong ground shaking triggered widespread underwater mudslides in the submarine canyon off Kaikōura, causing a full flushing event and powerful turbidity currents, as well as changes in bathymetry of up to 50 m (Mountjoy et al., 2018). The Kaikōura Canyon is a highly productive deep-sea habitat (De Leo et al., 2010) and a foraging ground for male sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus; Childerhouse et al., 1995), deep-diving predators that use echolocation to find their prey (Watkins et al., 1993; Madsen et al., 2002). Sperm whales have an important ecological role as top predators (Heithaus et al., 2008; Rosenblatt et al., 2013) and are a key natural asset for the local tourism industry, which is the main driver of Kaikōura's economy (Curtin, 2003). The abundance of sperm whales foraging in the area has almost halved over the last three decades (Somerford, 2018), but the causes for the decline remain unknown. The decline makes the population particularly vulnerable to additional impacts, highlighting the importance of monitoring the whales' responses to disturbance events. The sperm whales of Kaikōura have been studied since 1990. Data on abundance (Childerhouse et al., 1995; Somerford, 2018), behaviour (Jaquet et al., 2000, 2001; Miller et al., 2013; Guerra et al., 2017), distribution (Jaquet et al., 2000) and trophic ecology (Guerra, 2018) gathered prior to the earthquake provided a unique opportunity to assess the earthquake's impact on the population.

There are several ways in which earthquakes and subsequent aftershocks could affect sperm whales. In the short-term (hours to days), potential impacts include noise and re-suspension of sediment. Odontocete cetaceans, including sperm whales, depend on sound for communication, detection of prey and navigation, and are also highly sensitive to noise (e.g. Richardson et al., 1995; Southall et al., 2007). Earthquakes produce among the loudest underwater sounds, characterised by low-frequency noise similar to anthropogenic explosions (Hildebrand, 2009). Demonstrated impacts of underwater noise on cetaceans include injury, hearing damage, displacement and behavioural modifications (Ketten et al., 1993; Richardson et al., 1995; Nowacek et al., 2007). Re-suspension of sediment has the potential to interfere with the whales’ echolocation, as increased turbidity can impede propagation and processing of sound (Krahforst et al., 2012). Over longer periods (months to years), potential impacts include changes in distribution or foraging brought on by physical and biological alterations to deep-sea habitats. In the case of the Kaikōura earthquake, the large-scale erosion and sediment flow through the canyon had a dramatic impact on the seafloor structure and benthic ecosystem (Mountjoy et al., 2018). Of particular importance was the removal of benthic invertebrate communities which previously existed in the upper canyon (De Leo et al., 2010), with an estimated 39 × 106 kg of biomass removed due to sediment flushing (Mountjoy et al., 2018). Such impacts on benthos are likely to have significant consequences for the canyon food web, and thus may impact the top predators, including sperm whales, which forage on both demersal and pelagic prey (Miller et al., 2013; Guerra et al., 2017).

In the present study we aimed to identify the ecological impact of the Kaikōura earthquake on the sperm whale population by assessing pre-vs. post-earthquake patterns in diving behaviour, spatial distribution, and utilisation of food resources. Specifically, we quantified the temporal variability in: (1) ventilation and echolocation behaviour, including the time spent at the surface between dives, intervals between blows, and time taken to start echolocating after diving. These variables are related to metabolic rate and diving strategy (e.g., Richter et al., 2006; Fais et al., 2015), and can thus reflect changes in foraging efficiency; (2) spatial distribution, by examining the location of high-use areas; and (3) food resources utilised by sperm whales, using bulk and amino acid specific stable isotope analyses of sloughed whale skin. To address these questions, we analysed data gathered before and after the earthquake over a period of four years, and partitioned seasonal and annual variability.

Section snippets

Data collection

Data necessary for estimating sperm whale spatial distribution, behaviour and use of food resources were collected via boat-based surveys in a study site centred over the Kaikōura Canyon, New Zealand. Surveys were carried out during austral spring/summer (November–February, hereafter ‘summer’) and austral autumn/winter (May–July, hereafter ‘winter’) over a four-year period between January 2014 and January 2018, from a 6 m research boat, RV Grampus. Sperm whales were tracked acoustically with a

Sperm whale behaviour at kaikōura before and after the earthquake

A total of 678 encounters with 54 individual sperm whales were recorded in 149 days over nine field seasons from January 2014 to January 2018 (Table S1 in supplement). Of these, 486 were used for further analyses after excluding repeated encounters with the same individual on the same day. Data from these sightings were used for the analysis of spatial distribution (n = 486) and behaviour (n = 325 surface intervals; n = 237 mean blow intervals; n = 188 times from fluke-up to first echolocation

Discussion

This study is the first to examine the impacts of a large earthquake on a population of marine mammals, and helps to advance our understanding of the ecological effects of natural disturbance events on marine ecosystems. We observed substantial changes in the whales’ surface intervals between foraging dives and in the distribution of high-use areas, indicating shifts in habitat use for more than a year. These changes may reflect an increased search effort for prey and use of sub-optimal

Author contributions

MG, SD, AS, ES, TS, LW, RW and WR conceived the study ideas and designed methodology; MG, SD, TS, RW and WR collected the data; MG and AS carried out the chemical analyses; MG, AS and TS analysed the data; MG and WR led the writing of the manuscript; all authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the New Zealand Whale and Dolphin Trust, Whale Watch Kaikoura, the Ministry for Primary Industries and the University of Otago. This work was completed under Objectives 1–3 of Ministry for Primary Industries project KAI2016-06. We would like to thank all the volunteers who assisted with data collection in the field. We are grateful to Whale Watch Kaikoura for their overall support and for providing photographs of sperm whales outside the time of our surveys. We

References (70)

  • J. Barlow et al.

    A guide to constructing hydrophones and hydrophone arrays for monitoring marine mammal vocalisations

    NOAA Tech. Memo.

    (2008)
  • M. Bell et al.

    Effects of Hurricane Hugo on South Carolina's marine artificial reefs

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (1994)
  • T. Brough et al.

    Fine scale distribution for a population of New Zealand’s only endemic dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori) shows long‐term stability of coastal hotspots

    Mar. Mamm. Sci.

    (2019)
  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • S.J. Childerhouse et al.

    Abundance and seasonal residence of sperm whales at Kaikoura, New Zealand

    Can. J. Zool.

    (1995)
  • A. Cosentino

    Effects of whale-watching vessels on adult male sperm whales off Andenes, Norway

    Tour. Mar. Environ.

    (2016)
  • D.P. Costa et al.

    Marine mammal energetics

  • S. Curtin

    Whale-Watching in Kaikoura: sustainable destination development?

    J. Ecotourism

    (2003)
  • S. Dawson

    Building the “CETOS” Directional Hydrophone

    (2000)
  • F.C. De Leo et al.

    Submarine canyons: hotspots of benthic biomass and productivity in the deep sea

    Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci.

    (2010)
  • W.F. Dolphin

    Dive behaviour and estimated energy expenditure of foraging humpback whales in southeast Alaska

    Can. J. Zool.

    (1987)
  • A. Fais et al.

    Sperm whale echolocation behaviour reveals a directed, prior-based search strategy informed by prey distribution

    Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

    (2015)
  • J. Fieberg

    Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring

    Ecology

    (2007)
  • E. Fraile-Nuez et al.

    The submarine volcano eruption at the island of El Hierro: physical-chemical perturbation and biological response

    Sci. Rep.

    (2012)
  • B. Fry
    (2006)
  • J.P. Gallo-Reynoso et al.

    Reaction of fin whales balaenoptera physalus to an earthquake

    Bioacoustics

    (2011)
  • D.E. Gaskin et al.

    Diet and feeding habits of the sperm whale (Physeter Catodon L.) in the Cook Strait region of New Zealand

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (1967)
  • P.C. Gill et al.

    Blue whale habitat selection and within-season distribution in a regional upwelling system off southern Australia

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2011)
  • J. Gordon et al.
    (1992)
  • M. Guerra

    Foraging Ecology of Sperm Whales at Kaikōura. PhD Dissertation

    (2018)
  • I.J. Hamling et al.

    Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 M w 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand

    Science

    (2017)
  • T.J. Hastie et al.

    Generalized additive models

    Stat. Sci.

    (1990)
  • J.A. Hildebrand

    Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2009)
  • J.S. Horne et al.

    Correcting home-range models for observation bias

    J. Wildl. Manag.

    (2007)
  • N. Jaquet et al.

    Vocal behavior of male sperm whales: why do they click?

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Earthquake impacts on a protected pinniped in New Zealand

      2024, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text