Elsevier

Developmental Review

Volume 46, December 2017, Pages 44-53
Developmental Review

Review
Severe stress and the development of the amygdala in youth: A theory and its statistical implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.08.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Development of amygdala volumes may be altered under conditions of severe stress.

  • Stress may delay, accelerate, or prolong typical growth patterns.

  • Theory may help address inconsistencies in the literature.

Abstract

An empirical understanding of normal developmental variation in the amygdala is emerging. However, studies examining volumetric differences in the amygdala among patient populations, particularly individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), have not produced a consistent pattern of findings. One reason for this may be the failure to effectively address age variation in study design and data analysis. Findings on age related variation in human amygdala volumes as well as the role of stress on amygdala development are reviewed. A theory is developed which posits that normal developmental variation in amygdala volumes may be altered under conditions of severe stress. Specifically, that stress may delay, accelerate, or prolong typical growth patterns. The theory highlights identifying the factors related to either delayed, accelerated, or a prolonged period of growth. The theory also points to systematically testing age as an interactive (moderator) variable in pediatric and psychiatric neuroimaging research. This is because the theory implies that disorder status/exposure to severe stress may influence the relationship between age and amygdala volumes.

Introduction

The amygdala is a brain region of the anterior portion of the temporal lobes. Its main functions are thought to be involved in the evaluation of the emotional significance of incoming stimuli (Tottenham, 2012, Tottenham and Sheridan, 2010). The amygdala projects to several brain structures in the frontal cortex, the hippocampus, the striatum, the hypothalamus, and brain stem (see Gordon and Hen, 2004, LeDoux, 2000, Tottenham, 2012, Tottenham and Sheridan, 2010). Because of its structural connections and functionally identified roles, the amygdala is considered to have critical involvement in behavioral activation (approach) and inhibition (withdrawal) systems underlying emotional responses such as fear and anxiety and their regulation (Gray, 1994, Gray and McNaughton, 2000). Activation of the behavioral inhibition system is associated with fear, anxiety, and negative emotionality. Because of this link, the amygdala has received particular attention in biological theories of anxiety and stress related disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as well as other disorders involving emotion dysregulation (e.g., Davis, 1998, LeDoux, 2000).

Understanding the development of the amygdala has implications for emotional health and emotional disorder research given its role in the evaluation of the emotional significance of stimuli. While the empirical data is emerging, several factors may shape brain development in youth. Identifying developmental influences, such as parenting and stress, which may be associated with differential brain development is an important task (Belsky & de Haan, 2011). A number of perspectives suggest there may be differences in amygdala volumes among individuals exposed to severe or traumatic stress (Karl et al., 2006, Morey et al., 2012, Tottenham and Sheridan, 2010, Tottenham et al., 2010, Woon and Hedges, 2008, Woon and Hedges, 2009). However, studies examining volumetric differences in the amygdala among individuals with PTSD have not produced a consistent pattern of findings. For example, Morey et al. (2012) reviewed 12 studies on amygdala volumes among individuals (9 adult samples and 3 youth samples) with posttraumatic stress and reported four studies indicating relatively smaller volumes (in both sides); one relatively smaller in the left, but larger in the right; one study relatively smaller in the right, larger in left; and six relatively larger in both sides (compared to control participants). Only 1 of these 12 reported p-values reached the typical 0.05 alpha to indicate a statistically significant difference and so one conclusion might be that there is a consistent picture of non-statistically significant differences.

In this paper, findings on age related variation in human amygdala volumes as well as the role of stress on amygdala development are reviewed. A theory is developed which posits that normal developmental variation in amygdala volumes may be altered under conditions of severe stress. Specifically, that stress may delay, accelerate, or prolong normal growth. The theory highlights identifying the factors related to either delayed, accelerated, or a prolonged period of growth. The theory also points to systematically testing age (and other indices of maturation like pubertal development) as an interactive variable in pediatric and psychiatric neuroimaging research.

Section snippets

Normal developmental variation

There is fairly clear evidence that the amygdala develops (neuronal connections and structurally grows in size) until late childhood. Table 1 summarizes fourteen studies found in a literature search (using Medline, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, & review of references in previous publications) that have examined normal developmental variation in amygdala volumes or otherwise correlated age with amygdala volumes in various patient and control samples. Thirteen of these fourteen studies reported a

The role of stress on amygdala development

Tottenham and Sheridan (2010) have argued that adverse experiences can produce long-term changes in the amygdala structurally. In their view there is a stress-induced kindling of the amygdala where repeated stimulation produces greater future excitability and this implies potential differences in morphology. For example, among children adopted from orphanage care, Tottenham et al. (2010) reported a significant linear association between amygdala volumes and the amount of time spent in the

Future directions and statistical implications

The developmental theory presented here and findings from Weems et al. (2015, 2013) help contextualize research on youth with a history of traumatic stress and offer suggestions for the use of age in other patient populations. In particular, the model augments the work of Tottenham and colleagues (Tottenham, 2012, Tottenham and Sheridan, 2010) linking exposure to stress with atypical developmental variation in amygdala volumes in institutionalized children. Moreover the theory and findings are

References (61)

  • E. Gould et al.

    Stress and hippocampal neurogenesis

    Biological Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • A. Karchemskiy et al.

    Amygdalar, hippocampal, and thalamic volumes in youth at high risk for development of bipolar disorder

    Psychiatry Research

    (2011)
  • A. Karl et al.

    A meta-analysis of structural brain abnormalities in PTSD

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2006)
  • F.P. MacMaster et al.

    Amygdala and hippocampal volumes in familial early onset major depressive disorder

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • E. Nederhof et al.

    Mismatch or cumulative stress: Toward an integrated hypothesis of programming effects

    Physiology & Behavior

    (2012)
  • R.M. Sapolsky

    Potential behavioral modification of glucocorticoid damage to the hippocampus

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (1993)
  • Y. Watanabe et al.

    Stress induces atrophy of apical dendrites of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons

    Brain Research

    (1992)
  • M. Aghajani et al.

    Abnormal functional architecture of amygdala-centered networks in adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder

    Human Brain Mapping

    (2016)
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.)....
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2013)
  • R.M. Baron et al.

    The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • J. Belsky

    Variation in susceptibility to environmental influence: An evolutionary argument

    Psychological Inquiry

    (1997)
  • J. Belsky

    Differential susceptibility to rearing influence: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence

    Origins of the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Development

    (2005)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    For better and for worse differential susceptibility to environmental influences

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (2007)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    Annual research review: Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2009)
  • S.L. Berger et al.

    An operational definition of epigenetics

    Genes & Development

    (2009)
  • S.-J. Blakemore et al.

    The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain

    Human Brain Mapping

    (2010)
  • Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (2013). HLM 7.01 for Windows. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software...
  • J.P. Changeux et al.

    A theory of the epigenesis of neuronal networks by selective stabilization of synapses

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (1973)
  • Cited by (14)

    • A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Meta-Analysis of Childhood Trauma

      2024, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
    • Developmental Variation in Amygdala Volumes: Modeling Differences Across Time, Age, and Puberty

      2021, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, this finding contradicts the current hypotheses, which anticipated faster development of the right amygdala. Weems’s (10) synthesis of the literature reveals that the right amygdala may be more susceptible to effects of stress exposure. Notably, the typically developing participants in the current sample were unlikely to have endured such extreme forms of stress.

    • Meta-analysis of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies in Pediatric Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Comparison With Related Conditions

      2020, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous reviews of this literature (6,17) have proposed that a lack of significant findings regarding amygdalar volume in pediatric PTSD (9–11,15,19) may stem from developmental changes in limbic structures (38–40) that have not been taken into consideration. That is, the association between amygdalar volume and PTSD may vary depending on age, such that an effect could be obscured in studies that do not examine age-related changes (17,41). Although we find that age is a significant moderator of variability for hippocampal but not amygdalar regions in our primary analysis, age does emerge as a significant moderator for amygdalar regions when only tracing studies are included in the meta-analysis.

    • Does distress tolerance interact with trait anxiety to predict challenge or threat appraisals?

      2018, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the developmental shifts in emotion regulation and cognitive processes pertinent to risk or threat assessments occurring in early adulthood (Casey, Jones, & Somerville, 2011), future longitudinal efforts may also lend strength to this field by describing the stability of stress appraisals over time. This is particularly warranted given neurodevelopmental evidence of age-related changes in the maturation of structures associated with behavioral activation and inhibition crucial in the regulation of fear, anxiety, and negative emotions (Weems, 2017). Paired with evidence of similar age-related developments in assessing risk and decision-making (e.g., Rudolph, Miranda-Domínguez, Cohen, et al., 2017), future longitudinal studies should test stress appraisals as a mechanism that links DT and aspects of psychological functioning such as engagement in risky behaviors (e.g., Beck et al., 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text