BacteriologyA rapid, simple, and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification method to detect toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in rectal swab samples
Introduction
Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae strains belonging to the O1 and O139 serogroups cause cholera, an acute, diarrheal illness induced by cholera toxin (CT), in humans. The infection can be severe, causing profuse watery diarrhea and vomiting, potentially resulting in dehydration and death. Cholera is a highly communicable disease and has been categorized as an emerging and reemerging infection that threatens many developing countries (Satcher, 1995). Cases involving severe diarrhea are identified more readily than those that are mild or asymptomatic, but such cases should also be diagnosed quickly, because they can contribute to the dissemination of cholera infection (Kaper et al., 1995).
CT, encoded by the ctxAB genes, is the major virulence factor of V. cholerae. Toxigenic V. cholerae harbors lysogens of a filamentous bacteriophage designated CTXΦ, which carry the ctxAB genes, and the propagation of CTXΦ may be associated with the origin of novel strains of toxigenic V. cholerae from nontoxigenic progenitors (Faruque et al., 1998).
The current “gold standard” for identifying toxigenic V. cholerae O1 or O139 from clinical samples is the culture method, but it is laborious and time consuming. It takes several days to confirm and complete the identification of suspicious colonies by biochemical and serologic tests. The development of a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective method is required, not only for the quick and appropriate treatment of cholera patients, but also for the prompt control of cholera outbreaks and prevention of the disease.
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a novel nucleic acid amplification technique that relies on autocycling strand-displacement DNA synthesis performed by the Bst DNA polymerase large fragment (Tomita et al., 2008). In contrast to polymerase chain reaction (PCR), LAMP occurs continuously under isothermal conditions (60–64 °C) for about 60 min, which, in a positive sample, eventually produces a visible, white precipitate composed of magnesium pyrophosphate. The presence or absence of the white precipitate allows the easy assessment of samples with the naked eye (Mori et al., 2001, Tomita et al., 2008). The LAMP method amplifies DNA with high efficiency and without significant influence from coexisting nontargeted or contaminating DNA. The detection limit is a few copies of DNA, comparable to that of PCR (Hara-Kudo et al., 2005, Notomi et al., 2000).
Recently, Yamazaki et al. (2008) reported a LAMP method for detecting V. cholerae. These authors demonstrated the specificity of their method using bacterial cultures; however, they did not examine its sensitivity or its specificity using clinical specimens obtained from cholera patients. We report here another LAMP method for the sensitive and specific detection of toxigenic V. cholerae. Moreover, we performed a field study using our method that demonstrated that it reliably identified V. cholerae in clinical samples obtained during cholera outbreaks in Thailand.
Section snippets
Bacterial strains
A total of 66 bacterial strains (Table 1) provided by the Section of Culture Collection, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, were used for specificity testing. The classic strain V. cholerae Ogawa (ATCC 14035) was used in the LAMP sensitivity tests. All strains were grown aerobically on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar overnight at 37 °C or in LB broth overnight at 37 °C using a shaker incubator set at 200 rpm.
DNA extraction by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method
Bacterial pellets were lysed, and proteins were removed by
Specificity and sensitivity of LAMP method using bacterial strains
The specificity of LAMP method versus PCR was determined using 24 strains of O1 and O139 V. cholerae, 5 strains of non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, and 37 strains of 21 bacterial species other than V. cholerae (Table 1). The heat-extracted DNA samples of all the ctxA-positive O1 and O139 V. cholerae strains were positive by both the LAMP and PCR methods. Three O1 and O139 V. cholerae strains lacking the ctxA gene, non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, and the other bacterial species were negative by both
Discussion
Here we report the sensitivity and specificity of a newly developed LAMP method for detecting toxigenic V. cholerae, which can be used not only in the microbiology laboratory but also in hospitals or even in the field.
Our LAMP method was 10 times more sensitive than the PCR method, whether we used extracted DNA (Table 3A) or bacteria (Table 3B) as the template. The LAMP method detected as little as 5 fg DNA (Table 3A), about the same as 1 copy of the genomic DNA of V. cholerae (Heidelberg et
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Program of Founding Research Center for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases launched by a project commissioned by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and in part by the Department of Medical Sciences, the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. The authors would like to thank Shigeyuki Hamada and Yoshitake Nishimune for their critical reading of this manuscript.
References (17)
- et al.
Purification and characterization of PCR-inhibitory components in blood cells
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(2001) - et al.
Induction of the lysogenic phage encoding cholera toxin in naturally occurring strains of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139
Infect. Immun.
(1998) - et al.
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Salmonella
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
(2005) - et al.
DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholerae
Nature
(2000) - et al.
Tolerance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification to a culture medium and biological substances
J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods.
(2007) - et al.
Cholera
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
(1995) - et al.
Development and preliminary evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification procedure for sensitive detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in fecal and water samples
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(2007) - et al.
Inhibitory effects of urine on the polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA
J. Clin. Pathol.
(1991)
Cited by (51)
Diagnostic techniques for rapid detection of Vibrio species
2022, AquacultureCitation Excerpt :In both LAMP and in situ-LAMP, the Bst polymerase has offered both detection methods robustness, especially in the presence of inhibitory substances (Li et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2008). In a regular LAMP assay, nucleic acid extraction and cell destruction is required, thus complicating the detection and pre-processing steps (Okada et al., 2010). On the other hand, in situ-LAMP allows the amplification of target sequences to be done within intact cells.
A comprehensive review of conventional techniques and biosensor systems developed for in situ detection of vibrio cholerae
2021, TrAC - Trends in Analytical ChemistryDevelopment of an advanced DNA biosensor for pathogenic Vibrio cholerae detection in real sample
2021, Biosensors and BioelectronicsA smartphone-based particle diffusometry platform for sub-attomolar detection of Vibrio cholerae in environmental water
2020, Biosensors and BioelectronicsCitation Excerpt :We establish the robustness of this smartphone-based PD platform, determine its selectivity and limit of detection (LOD) for V. cholerae in pond water, and compare its sensitivity and specificity to real-time fluorescence detection using 132 blinded samples. LAMP primers, provided in Table S1, were designed to target the cholera toxin A (ctxA) gene (sequence in Table S2) of toxigenic V. cholerae strains (Okada et al., 2010). There is one copy of the ctxA gene per V. cholerae genome.
Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139
2019, Molecular and Cellular Probes