Complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish diabetes patients
Introduction
Interest in and use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has recently grown in many countries around the World.1 Population-based studies in countries in the developed world, such as Australia,2 UK,3 Taiwan,4 Singapore5 and the United States of America,6 report that one-half to two-thirds of adults use CAM.
As there are many factors, such as the socio-cultural and personal values underlying a person's decision to use alternative therapies, at present, there is no clear or comprehensive theoretical model to account for the increased use of alternative forms of health care.7
Because of the potential threat to quality of life and the chronic nature of diabetes, many people turn to complementary therapies (CTs) to assist them in coping with and controlling the disease. That they do so is not unexpected, since many people with chronic diseases utilize CTs.8
Studies that examine complementary therapy usage rates by diabetics have notably different results. Leese et al.9 surveyed people with diabetes attending a diabetic outpatient clinic in the UK and found 17% were using CT. A similar survey in Canada found 25% of people with diabetes used CT.10 A nation-wide survey in the USA found people with diabetes were 1.6 times more likely to use a CT than non-diabetics, but the pattern of use was similar in both groups.11 The most widely used therapies among diabetic populations are nutritional supplements, herbal medicines, nutritional advice, and spiritual healing and relaxation techniques.1
Medical practice in Turkey (and Anatolia specifically) date back to ancient times.12 In modern times, CAM, as passed on from earlier times, exist in parallel with conventional medicine. CAM in Turkey is practiced almost exclusively by people not versed in conventional medicine. CAM practices cover a wide spectrum ranging from herbal prescriptions to religious practices.13
In Turkey, many studies have been carried out on the applications of CAM. However, almost all of them involve patients with malignancies. After publishing the first study in 2002, the extent and patterns of CAM use among patients with malignancies were studied. According to results of these studies, the prevalence of CAM use among people with malignancies range from 36% to 61%.14, 15, 16, 17 Although there were a few studies focused on general CAM use, the authors of the present study could find no particular study carried out among only patients with DM in Turkey.
The purpose of this study is to measure the frequency of CAM use in patients with diabetes while undergoing or after undergoing conventional treatment, to determine the demographic characteristics that make it more likely to use CAM, and to find out how such patients perceive the benefits, if any, from the use of CAM.
Section snippets
Material and methods
This is a cross-sectional study on patients admitted to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Gülhane Military Medical Academy (GMMA), Ankara, Turkey from January 2006 to December 2006.
Results
The data collected from 371 patients are charted in Table 1 by demographic characteristics. Forty-one percent of patients (n = 152) used at least one type of CAM practices.
Sex, marital status and age groups proved not to be significant factors (p > 0.05 in each case). The mean duration of diabetes of the patients was 9.1 ± 7.5 years, and ranged from 1 year to 36 years. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was found among the patients with a time interval of 1–5 years, 6–10 years and 11 years or more
Discussion
Many studies were conducted on patients with DM who use complementary or alternative methods. Chang and colleagues cited a total of 18 studies from nine countries and reported that the frequency of using complementary/alternative methods varied between 17% and 72.8% for the patients with DM.1 The rate of 41% that we found in this study is close to the average of the findings of earlier studies.
Complementary and alternative medicine practices have been widespread in Anatolia for centuries and
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all survey respondents in this study and wish them well. I am especially grateful to the staff of Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey for their earnest support and accommodation for this study.
References (24)
- et al.
Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
Complementary therapies in a local healthcare setting. Part 1. Is there real public demand?
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
(1996) - et al.
Complementary and alternative medicine use in multiracial Singapore
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
(2005) Complementary therapies and diabetes
Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery
(2003)- et al.
Survey of the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Turkish cancer patients
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
(2002) - et al.
The use of complementary and alternative (non-conventional) medicine in cancer patients in Turkey
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
(2005) - et al.
Turkish folk medicinal plants. Part IV. Gonen Balikesir
Fitoterapia
(2001) - et al.
Use of complementary and alternative medicine among people living with diabetes: literature review
Journal of Advanced Nursing
(2007) Who uses non-biomedical, complement and alternative health care? Sociodemographic undifferentiation and the effects of health needs
Taiwan Journal Public Health
(2003)- et al.
Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine
(2005)
Why patients use alternative medicine?
Journal of the American Medical Association
Prevalence of complementary medicine usage within a diabetic clinic
Practical Diabetes International
Cited by (57)
Herbal medicine use among Moroccan type 2 diabetes patients in the Beni Mellal-Khenifra region
2021, Journal of Herbal MedicineUse of complementary medicine among people with diabetes in eastern Turkey: A descriptive study
2019, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeCitation Excerpt :Some previous studies indicated that the majority of the people with diabetes reach their goals about the CM method they used [4,6,23]. Ceylan et al. on the other hand, reported that people with diabetes who used CM did not reach their goals [15]. It is believed that this difference in study results was caused the inadequate knowledge of the patients regarding CM and their usage of CM to eliminate complications rather than for treatment.
Satisfaction with and factors related to medicinal herb consumption in older Iranian adults
2019, European Journal of Integrative MedicineComplementary and alternative medicine use amongst Turkish type 2 diabetic patients: A cross-sectional study
2018, Complementary Therapies in MedicineHungarian health care students’ choices between complementary and alternative medicine or conventional medicine: A cross-sectional survey
2018, KontaktCitation Excerpt :Previous studies have investigated the primary factors predicting the use of CAM therapies in different types of diseases [15–18]. The most widely studied groups were patients with cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [15–18]. The use of CAM showed a large difference between the countries and the illnesses as according to the groups.
The association between quality of life and complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with diabetes mellitus
2018, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeCitation Excerpt :In a study conducted in Turkey, patients with DM often use stinging nettle, cinnamon, thyme juice and black cumin as CAM [34]. Ceylan et al. reported that garden thyme, pomegranate syrup and stinging nettle were the most common herbal products preferred by patients with DM [35]. In the present study, it was found that black cumin, cinnamon and olive leaf was used in the first three ranks.