New biocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and bacterial cellulose
Introduction
New functional materials obtained from renewable resources have gained much attention in the last decades due to the global increasing demand for alternatives to fossil resources [1]. For example, composites based on thermoplastic polymers and natural fibers are very attractive materials because of their good mechanical properties, sustainability and environmental-friendly connotation [2]. These materials have been widely used in the automotive and packaging industries [2] and their applications in other areas are being actively sought.
The use of natural fibers as reinforcing elements in composite materials presents important advantages, when compared with their synthetic or inorganic counterparts, namely biodegradability, high availability, low cost, low energy consumption, low density, high specific strength and modulus (with fibers possessing an adequate aspect ratio), high sound attenuation and comparatively easy processing ability due to their flexibility and non-abrasive nature [3].
In addition, if the natural fibers are combined with biodegradable matrices, the obtained composite materials are expected to be fully biodegradable. The development of biocomposites gained particular relevance with the increasing availability and diversity of biodegradable polymers [4].
Starch is one of the most abundant natural polymers and is considered as a promising raw material for the development of novel materials, including biocomposites. It can be converted into a thermoplastic material, known as thermoplastic starch (TPS), through the disruption of the molecular chain interactions under specific conditions, in the presence of a plasticizer. Water and glycerol are the most widely used plasticizers in the production of TPS. When natural fibers are mixed with TPS, its mechanical properties are improved, indicating a good adhesion between the reinforcing fibers and the matrix [4], [5]. Several studies have been published dealing with the preparation and characterization of TPS-based composites with different cellulose substrates, namely commercial regenerated cellulose fibers [6], vegetable fibers [6], [7], [8], microcrystalline cellulose [9], microfibrillated cellulose [3] and cellulose nanocrystallites [5]. Apart from the enhanced mechanical properties of these reinforced TPS materials, a significant improvement in water resistance is also obtained by adding cellulose crystallites [10] or microfibrillated cellulose [3]. In general, these TPS/fiber composites also displayed improved thermal stability due to the higher thermal resistance of cellulose fibers [7].
Owing to its unique properties, such as high mechanical strength, high crystallinity and a highly pure nanofibrillar network structure, bacterial cellulose, produced by Acetobacter Xylinum, is becoming a promising biopolymer for several applications. For example, due to its biocompatibility [11], bacterial cellulose has been extensively investigated in the biomedical field [12], [13], [14]. Other applications include its use as component for audio membranes [15], electronic paper [16], optically transparent composites [17], reinforcing agent for paper [18] and other polymeric materials and composites [19], among others.
However, to the best of our knowledge, only two studies dealing with the preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose-starch composites have been published so far [20], [21]. Grande et al. obtained a plasticized starch/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite sheets by hot-pressing. The ensuing films were characterized in terms of their morphology, whereas other important parameters, such as their mechanical and thermal properties, were not investigated. The incorporation of bacterial cellulose microfibrils, obtained by the acid hydrolysis of the cellulose network, into extruded TPS and starch-pectin blends was also studied [21]. However, in this work, the peculiarity of this cellulose substrate was not fully exploited, since the nano- and micro-fibril three-dimensional network morphology was partially destroyed during the hydrolysis step. Indeed, the microfibrils derived from bacterial cellulose did not improve the modulus to the same extent as cotton or softwood counterparts.
The present paper describes the preparation and characterization of biocomposite materials obtained by the incorporation of bacterial cellulose into a TPS matrix during the gelatinization process. Similar composite materials reinforced with vegetable cellulose fibers were also prepared for comparison purposes.
Section snippets
Materials
Bacterial cellulose (BC) (a tridimensional network of nano and microfibrils with 10–100 nm width), in the shredded wet form (95% of humidity), was supplied by Forschungszentrum für Medizintechnik und Biotechnologie e.V. (Germany). The vegetable cellulose fibers (VC) (with 0.8–1 mm length and 20–30 μm width) used in this work were from a Eucalyptus globulus ECF (DEDED) industrial bleached kraft pulp, kindly provided by a Portuguese pulp mill.
Corn starch (27% amylose), glycerol (99.5%), stearic acid
Results and discussion
The unfilled TPS and all biocomposites prepared in this study were in general very homogenous, since the formation of agglomerates was not visually observed.
Conclusions
This study provides an initial insight into the use and characteristics of bacterial cellulose in starch-based composites. Bacterial cellulose acts efficiently as reinforcement, even in relatively low quantities, since 5% produced a significant increase in both modulus and tensile strength. These materials are promising candidates in applications like food packaging and biodegradable artifacts. However, the ensuing composites displayed a strong sensitivity to high relative humidity. Work is in
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Cruz Pinto for his valuable contribution with the DMA experiments optimization. L. Oliveira thanks the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal) for a post-doctoral Grant (SFRH/PBD/38515/2007).
References (25)
- et al.
Plasticized starch–cellulose interactions in polysaccharide composites
Polymer
(2001) - et al.
Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites – reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites
Carbohyd Polym
(2006) - et al.
Thermoplastic starch–cellulosic fibers composites: preliminary results
Carbohyd Polym
(2001) - et al.
Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites
Carbohyd Polym
(2008) - et al.
Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage
Biomaterials
(2005) - et al.
Bacterial synthesized cellulose – artificial blood vessels for microsurgery
Prog Polym Sci
(2001) Novel and established applications of microbial polysaccharides
Trends Biotechnol
(1998)- et al.
Studies on the properties of natural fibers-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites
Carbohyd Polym
(2005) - et al.
Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis
Int J Biol Macromol
(1998) - et al.
Phase and glass transition behaviour of concentrated barley starch–glycerol–water mixtures, a model for thermoplastic starch
Carbohyd Polym
(1997)
Thermal conductivity of thermoplastics reinforced with natural fibers
Int J Thermophys
Cited by (172)
Use of bacterial cellulose (BC) from a mutated strain for BC-starch composite film preparation
2023, Process BiochemistryNanocomposite films: Features and suitability for food packaging
2023, Biocomposites for Industrial Applications: Construction, Biomedical, Transportation and Food PackagingIn situ regulation of bacterial cellulose networks by starch from different sources or amylose/amylopectin content during fermentation
2022, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesEcofriendly green biosynthesis and characterization of novel bacteriocin-loaded bacterial cellulose nanofiber from Gluconobacter cerinus HDX-1
2021, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules