Exploring the development of college students' epistemic views during their knowledge building activities
Introduction
The need for novel ideas and new knowledge to solve emerging societal problems is ever-increasing (Csikszentmihalyi and Wolfe, 2014, Drucker, 2011). As ideas are essential for problem-solving and knowledge-creation and humans are by nature capable of generating ideas, it has become ever more important for education to consider how to nourish students' creative capacity to produce and work innovatively with ideas (Koh, Chai, Wong, & Hong, 2015). The challenge for knowledge creation, however, is how sustained effort for idea improvement can be maintained (Scardamalia and Bereiter, 2003, Scardamalia and Bereiter, 2006). Traditional education tends to highlight the importance of acquiring knowledge from authoritative sources (e.g., textbooks and instructors), but neglects the importance of guiding students towards generating and improving ideas for knowledge work (Chen, Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2015). Papert (2000) calls this phenomenon “idea aversion” (i.e., the dislike of ideas), and argues that most traditional learning environments are inclined to withhold approval from students who have their own ideas, while being in favour of direct instruction by teachers (cf. Kirschner et al., 2006, Sawyer, 2004, Sawyer, 2011). Students' self-initiated ideas are less valued and appreciated (than textbook knowledge) in most learning environments, and much less are students encouraged to devote themselves to improving their ideas to advance knowledge. To address this concern, the present study attempted to engage students in the sustained production and improvement of ideas in a knowledge-building environment. The main aim was to help students develop a more constructivist-oriented view that sees ideas as having an important role for solving real-world problems and at the same time creating new knowledge. In the following, we first discuss the essential role of ideas in knowledge creation from a theoretical perspective, based on Popper's (1978) three-world epistemology. Next, we describe knowledge-building pedagogy as a possible pedagogical approach for the transformation of students' epistemic view of ideas, so that they see ideas as fundamental epistemic objects for knowledge creation. Finally, we report our findings and discuss important implications for education and future research.
Section snippets
Epistemological views concerning idea-centered knowledge work
The important role ideas play in a knowledge society may be best explained by Popper's (1972) three-world epistemology. Popper postulates three different forms of ontological reality to explain how the three epistemic worlds come into being. The three epistemic worlds are: (1) the natural/physical world (World 1), (2) the spiritual/psychological world (World 2), and (3) the humanly-constructed conceptual world (World 3). In brief, World 1 refers to natural or physical reality, and can exist by
The present study
Previous studies have primarily focused on exploring the relationships between epistemic beliefs and individual learning (e.g., see Chiou et al., 2013, Lin et al., 2012, Muis, 2007, Yang, 2016), particularly in the online learning environment (e.g., see Ding et al., 2015, Psycharis, 2013), rather than the relationships between epistemic views and knowledge building/knowledge creation. Learning or knowledge telling is, however, different from knowledge building in that the former mainly
Method
Using a case study method, this research aims to examine in a class environment the detailed process of how students engage in online collaborative knowledge building activities and how such group activities are related to the development of a more knowledge-creation-oriented epistemic view. While it is often a concern regarding the small sample size from a case study, some research has demonstrated that case study can still lead to generalizable findings to inform the interpretation of
Epistemic view
To examine students' epistemic views, a survey was administered in the beginning and at the end of the semester. As Table 3 shows, in the beginning of the semester, the participants' understanding of the nature of ideas was quite limited (using pre-survey for assessment), as their epistemic view scores (i.e., 0.62 for World 2 views and 0.73 for World 3 views; all three aspects combined) were way below the middle value (which is 1.5, with the maximum score being 3.0). Although a multivariate
Discussion
In summary, the findings based on the pre-post survey of epistemic views suggested that there was a significant positive relationship between students' engagement in online knowledge-building practice and the development of their more innovation-oriented, World-3 epistemic view. Specifically, it was found that: (1) students had a relatively less well-informed epistemic view at the beginning of the semester than at the end of the semester; (2) after engaging in collaborative knowledge-building
Acknowledgments
Support for writing this article was provided, in part, from a Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology grant (MOST#104-2511-S-004-001-MY3) and from a Top University Project grant funded by Taiwan Ministry of Education.
References (56)
- et al.
Evaluation of computer tools for idea generation and team formation in project-based learning
Computers & Education
(2011) - et al.
Students' views of collaboration and online participation in knowledge forum
Computers & Education
(2011) - et al.
Using epistemic synchronization index (ESI) to measure students' knowledge elaboration process in CSCL
Computers & Education
(2015) - et al.
Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment
Computers & Education
(2014) - et al.
Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(2000) Examining the effect of the computational models on learning performance, scientific reasoning, epistemic beliefs and argumentation: an implication for the STEM agenda
Computers & Education
(2013)Education and mind in the knowledge age
(2002)Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's world 3
Educational Researcher
(1994)- et al.
Knowledge building and knowledge creation: one concept, two hills to climb
- et al.
Learning to work creatively with knowledge
An experiment is when you try it and see if it works
International Journal of Science Education
Exploratory factor analysis for the survey of epistemic beliefs for discipline-based knowledge creation
Advancing knowledge-building discourse through judgments of promising ideas
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
High school students' approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics
Research in Science & Technological Education
The conceptualization of scientific specialties
The Sociological Quarterly
Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups
Management Science
New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education
Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society
Even geniuses work hard
Educational Leadership
Collaboration rules
Harvard Business Review
Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education
American Journal of Distance Education
Acceptance of ideas generated through individual and group brainstorming
Journal of Social Psychology
The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited
Sociological theory
Understanding how students perceive the role of ideas for their knowledge work in a knowledge-building environment
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
How learning about scientists' struggles influences students' interest and learning in physics
Journal of educational psychology
Knowledge society network: toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology
Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation
Educational Technology Research & Development
Cited by (25)
Improving secondary school students' epistemic beliefs about physics through dialogic practical work
2023, Teaching and Teacher EducationUnderstanding student teachers’ collaborative problem solving: Insights from an epistemic network analysis (ENA)
2022, Computers and EducationCitation Excerpt :Our findings echoed this conclusion and showed the positive role of regular negotiation ideas in collaborative problem solving. In online collaborative learning, regular negotiation contributes to the improvement of learners’ satisfaction (e.g., Kurucay & Inan, 2017), the formation of a sense of community (e.g., Zhang et al., 2017), and the development of innovation-oriented epistemic views (e.g., Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016). This finding not only pointed out the importance of regular negotiation and communication in collaborative problem solving activities, but also extended the findings of CSCL studies by showing that differences in the temporal aspect of collaborative processes rather than the quantity of behaviors are key factors affecting collaborative performance (Lämsä et al., 2021).
Exploring the influence of interactive network and collective knowledge construction mode on students’ perceived collective agency
2021, Computers and EducationCitation Excerpt :The members of group 4 had more question-raising, restating, explanation, and evaluating conversations than group 1, but their perception of collective agency after the designed activities was not high. This is congruent with existing studies on collaborative learning environment design (e.g., Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016; Yücel & Usluel, 2016; Zhao & Chan, 2014), that aim to guide students to put forward and resolve conflicting opinions, which is also conducive to students' in-depth knowledge construction. As Weinberger and Fischer (2006) had argued, conflict-oriented consensus building is more effective for co-construction of knowledge than elicitation (e.g., question) and quick consensus making (e.g., agreement).
Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan
2019, Learning and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Knowledge building by nature is principle-based rather than procedure-based. As such, it highlights the importance of teachers engaging in fairly flexible and adaptive pedagogical enactment using a set of knowledge-building principles as heuristics (see Scardamalia, 2002, for details), with an aim to continually improve classroom designs and practices (Chan, 2011; Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016). This is in contrast to other constructivist approaches that are defined by structured learning procedures, e.g., inquiry learning cycles (Bell, Urhahne, Schanze, & Ploetzner, 2010; Pedaste et al., 2015), or scripted learning activities (Mäkitalo, Weinberger, Häkkinen, Järvelä, & Fischer, 2005; Stegmann, Wecker, Weinberger, & Fischer, 2012).
Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments
2018, Computers and EducationCitation Excerpt :Increased research interest has now been given to CSCL and knowledge building for tertiary students (Hong et al., 2014). Research has shown how pre-service teachers change their beliefs and relations between sustained knowledge building and epistemic views (Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016); how KB can support both individual and collective knowledge growth (Zhao & Chan, 2014); and how community and group designs have different effects on students' KB (Siqin, van Aalst, & Chu, 2015). As mainland China university students have been shown to lack interest in collaboration (Ge, 2011), it is of interest to explore how to develop viable designs.
Investigating the mechanisms of analytics-supported reflective assessment for fostering collective knowledge
2024, Journal of Computing in Higher Education