Elsevier

Computers & Education

Volume 98, July 2016, Pages 1-13
Computers & Education

Exploring the development of college students' epistemic views during their knowledge building activities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Knowledge-building enables sustained idea improvement for knowledge advances.

  • Knowledge-building helps students develop innovation-oriented epistemic views.

  • Knowledge building is conducive to more effective group inquiry activities.

  • Students' epistemic views are related to effective group inquiry activity.

Abstract

Exploring students' epistemic views is important as it should help to better understand how they acquire and work with knowledge. This case study investigated how college students' epistemic views relate to their collaborative inquiry activities in an online knowledge-building environment. Findings based on a mixed-method analysis on students' online discourse and open-ended survey questions suggested that students' knowledge-building activities were positively related to the development of their epistemic views. In particular, when students were able to engage in more productive and effective group inquiry activities, they were more likely to develop a more sophisticated epistemic view that was conducive to sustained idea improvement for advancing knowledge. The study has implications for understanding how students’ views on the nature of knowledge creation and the manner in which collaborative inquiry is conducted in an online environment affect each other.

Introduction

The need for novel ideas and new knowledge to solve emerging societal problems is ever-increasing (Csikszentmihalyi and Wolfe, 2014, Drucker, 2011). As ideas are essential for problem-solving and knowledge-creation and humans are by nature capable of generating ideas, it has become ever more important for education to consider how to nourish students' creative capacity to produce and work innovatively with ideas (Koh, Chai, Wong, & Hong, 2015). The challenge for knowledge creation, however, is how sustained effort for idea improvement can be maintained (Scardamalia and Bereiter, 2003, Scardamalia and Bereiter, 2006). Traditional education tends to highlight the importance of acquiring knowledge from authoritative sources (e.g., textbooks and instructors), but neglects the importance of guiding students towards generating and improving ideas for knowledge work (Chen, Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2015). Papert (2000) calls this phenomenon “idea aversion” (i.e., the dislike of ideas), and argues that most traditional learning environments are inclined to withhold approval from students who have their own ideas, while being in favour of direct instruction by teachers (cf. Kirschner et al., 2006, Sawyer, 2004, Sawyer, 2011). Students' self-initiated ideas are less valued and appreciated (than textbook knowledge) in most learning environments, and much less are students encouraged to devote themselves to improving their ideas to advance knowledge. To address this concern, the present study attempted to engage students in the sustained production and improvement of ideas in a knowledge-building environment. The main aim was to help students develop a more constructivist-oriented view that sees ideas as having an important role for solving real-world problems and at the same time creating new knowledge. In the following, we first discuss the essential role of ideas in knowledge creation from a theoretical perspective, based on Popper's (1978) three-world epistemology. Next, we describe knowledge-building pedagogy as a possible pedagogical approach for the transformation of students' epistemic view of ideas, so that they see ideas as fundamental epistemic objects for knowledge creation. Finally, we report our findings and discuss important implications for education and future research.

Section snippets

Epistemological views concerning idea-centered knowledge work

The important role ideas play in a knowledge society may be best explained by Popper's (1972) three-world epistemology. Popper postulates three different forms of ontological reality to explain how the three epistemic worlds come into being. The three epistemic worlds are: (1) the natural/physical world (World 1), (2) the spiritual/psychological world (World 2), and (3) the humanly-constructed conceptual world (World 3). In brief, World 1 refers to natural or physical reality, and can exist by

The present study

Previous studies have primarily focused on exploring the relationships between epistemic beliefs and individual learning (e.g., see Chiou et al., 2013, Lin et al., 2012, Muis, 2007, Yang, 2016), particularly in the online learning environment (e.g., see Ding et al., 2015, Psycharis, 2013), rather than the relationships between epistemic views and knowledge building/knowledge creation. Learning or knowledge telling is, however, different from knowledge building in that the former mainly

Method

Using a case study method, this research aims to examine in a class environment the detailed process of how students engage in online collaborative knowledge building activities and how such group activities are related to the development of a more knowledge-creation-oriented epistemic view. While it is often a concern regarding the small sample size from a case study, some research has demonstrated that case study can still lead to generalizable findings to inform the interpretation of

Epistemic view

To examine students' epistemic views, a survey was administered in the beginning and at the end of the semester. As Table 3 shows, in the beginning of the semester, the participants' understanding of the nature of ideas was quite limited (using pre-survey for assessment), as their epistemic view scores (i.e., 0.62 for World 2 views and 0.73 for World 3 views; all three aspects combined) were way below the middle value (which is 1.5, with the maximum score being 3.0). Although a multivariate

Discussion

In summary, the findings based on the pre-post survey of epistemic views suggested that there was a significant positive relationship between students' engagement in online knowledge-building practice and the development of their more innovation-oriented, World-3 epistemic view. Specifically, it was found that: (1) students had a relatively less well-informed epistemic view at the beginning of the semester than at the end of the semester; (2) after engaging in collaborative knowledge-building

Acknowledgments

Support for writing this article was provided, in part, from a Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology grant (MOST#104-2511-S-004-001-MY3) and from a Top University Project grant funded by Taiwan Ministry of Education.

References (56)

  • S. Carey et al.

    An experiment is when you try it and see if it works

    International Journal of Science Education

    (1989)
  • C.-S. Chai et al.

    Exploratory factor analysis for the survey of epistemic beliefs for discipline-based knowledge creation

    (2015, Nov)
  • B. Chen et al.

    Advancing knowledge-building discourse through judgments of promising ideas

    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

    (2015)
  • G.L. Chiou et al.

    High school students' approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics

    Research in Science & Technological Education

    (2013)
  • D.E. Chubin

    The conceptualization of scientific specialties

    The Sociological Quarterly

    (1976)
  • T. Connolly et al.

    Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups

    Management Science

    (1990)
  • M. Csikszentmihalyi et al.

    New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education

  • M. Diehl et al.

    Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • P.F. Drucker

    The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society

    (2011)
  • C.S. Dweck

    Even geniuses work hard

    Educational Leadership

    (2010)
  • P. Evans et al.

    Collaboration rules

    Harvard Business Review

    (2005)
  • D.R. Garrison et al.

    Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education

    American Journal of Distance Education

    (2001)
  • W.K. Graham

    Acceptance of ideas generated through individual and group brainstorming

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1977)
  • M. Granovetter

    The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited

    Sociological theory

    (1983)
  • H.-Y. Hong et al.

    Understanding how students perceive the role of ideas for their knowledge work in a knowledge-building environment

    Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

    (2016)
  • H.-Y. Hong et al.

    How learning about scientists' struggles influences students' interest and learning in physics

    Journal of educational psychology

    (2012)
  • H.-Y. Hong et al.

    Knowledge society network: toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge

    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology

    (2010)
  • H.-Y. Hong et al.

    Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation

    Educational Technology Research & Development

    (2009)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Understanding student teachers’ collaborative problem solving: Insights from an epistemic network analysis (ENA)

      2022, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our findings echoed this conclusion and showed the positive role of regular negotiation ideas in collaborative problem solving. In online collaborative learning, regular negotiation contributes to the improvement of learners’ satisfaction (e.g., Kurucay & Inan, 2017), the formation of a sense of community (e.g., Zhang et al., 2017), and the development of innovation-oriented epistemic views (e.g., Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016). This finding not only pointed out the importance of regular negotiation and communication in collaborative problem solving activities, but also extended the findings of CSCL studies by showing that differences in the temporal aspect of collaborative processes rather than the quantity of behaviors are key factors affecting collaborative performance (Lämsä et al., 2021).

    • Exploring the influence of interactive network and collective knowledge construction mode on students’ perceived collective agency

      2021, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      The members of group 4 had more question-raising, restating, explanation, and evaluating conversations than group 1, but their perception of collective agency after the designed activities was not high. This is congruent with existing studies on collaborative learning environment design (e.g., Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016; Yücel & Usluel, 2016; Zhao & Chan, 2014), that aim to guide students to put forward and resolve conflicting opinions, which is also conducive to students' in-depth knowledge construction. As Weinberger and Fischer (2006) had argued, conflict-oriented consensus building is more effective for co-construction of knowledge than elicitation (e.g., question) and quick consensus making (e.g., agreement).

    • Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan

      2019, Learning and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Knowledge building by nature is principle-based rather than procedure-based. As such, it highlights the importance of teachers engaging in fairly flexible and adaptive pedagogical enactment using a set of knowledge-building principles as heuristics (see Scardamalia, 2002, for details), with an aim to continually improve classroom designs and practices (Chan, 2011; Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016). This is in contrast to other constructivist approaches that are defined by structured learning procedures, e.g., inquiry learning cycles (Bell, Urhahne, Schanze, & Ploetzner, 2010; Pedaste et al., 2015), or scripted learning activities (Mäkitalo, Weinberger, Häkkinen, Järvelä, & Fischer, 2005; Stegmann, Wecker, Weinberger, & Fischer, 2012).

    • Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments

      2018, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      Increased research interest has now been given to CSCL and knowledge building for tertiary students (Hong et al., 2014). Research has shown how pre-service teachers change their beliefs and relations between sustained knowledge building and epistemic views (Hong, Chen, & Chai, 2016); how KB can support both individual and collective knowledge growth (Zhao & Chan, 2014); and how community and group designs have different effects on students' KB (Siqin, van Aalst, & Chu, 2015). As mainland China university students have been shown to lack interest in collaboration (Ge, 2011), it is of interest to explore how to develop viable designs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text