Medical Management of Hip Fracture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2008.07.002Get rights and content

The United States population at the greatest risk for hip fracture, those aged 65 years and older, is steadily increasing in size. Today, the incidence of hip fracture is approximately 250,000 per year and it is expected to double in the next 30 years. Hip fracture patients are comorbid at baseline, and there are complications inherent to hip fractures that can occur in almost a predictable fashion. Overall, one in four hip fracture patients will die within one year of injury. Medical comanagement of hip fracture patients offers the best chance for successful outcome.

Section snippets

Epidemiology

The incidence in adults aged 65 years and older is estimated to be 818/100,000 habitants.8 Women are affected 2 to 3 times more than men, with a proportionately similar ethnic predominance in Caucasians versus other ethnicities.9

Falls account for 90% of hip fractures in the elderly. Patients' habitus and the characteristics of the fall (direction, site of impact, and protective response) influence the risk of hip fracture.10 The lifetime risk for suffering a fragility fracture in 50-year-old

The role of the medical specialist

The patient with hip fracture is often medically complex. A multidisciplinary approach that includes the orthopedic surgeon, anesthesiologist, and the medical specialist is important if optimal outcomes are to be achieved. To further understand the different roles of each team member, surgery has been compared with a plane flight where the patient is the plane.21 The surgeon is the pilot and the anesthesiologist is the copilot. Together, the pilots and the plane must take off and land safely.

Special considerations in the geriatric patient

Age is not an illness, but it is an independent risk factor for morbidity, mortality, and perioperative outcome. Age-related changes in physiology and pharmacology might affect every aspect of perioperative care. The basal function of various organ systems may be relatively uncompromised, yet functional reserve and the ability to compensate for physiologic stress are reduced (Fig. 1).29 As a result, it is often difficult to predict the effect of perioperative stress on the geriatric patient.

Type of hip fracture and operative implications

Hip fractures are classified according to their anatomic location. They can be intracapsular (involving the neck and head of the femur) or extracapsular (intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric). Approximately 90% of hip fractures occur in equal proportions in the femoral neck and intertrochanteric regions, generally caused by low-energy trauma, such as falling from a chair or slipping on the ice.22 Subtrochanteric fractures account for the remaining 5% to 10%2 and are often associated with

Timing of surgery

Hip fracture repair should occur as soon as possible once the patient is optimized for the operating room. Delay in hip fracture repair does negatively affect the return to weight bearing and overall functional recovery. Case series and observational studies suggest that early surgical repair (within 24–48 hours) can decrease 1-year mortality1, 2, 6, 27, 38 in addition to decreasing postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and major complications.39 Early mobilization will enhance recovery

Surgical-Site Infections

The use of perioperative antibiotics before surgery has dramatically decreased the incidence of wound infections in hip fracture patients.2 A Cochrane review of 22 trials (n = 8,307) demonstrated that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreased deep-wound and urinary tract infections by 64% and 44%, respectively.41

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (Staphylococcus epidermidis) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus are the most frequently isolated organisms in hip fracture

Treatment of pain

Inadequate pain control increases length of hospital stay, delays ambulation, and decreases overall mobility at 6 months. There is little evidence regarding the best analgesic approach.57 Narcotic analgesia can worsen mental status and precipitate delirium, but suboptimal analgesia should be avoided.33 Non-narcotic analgesia with acetaminophen should be scheduled, 1 g every 6 hours around the clock; opioids should provide breakthrough pain (early-stage breakthrough pain with low-dose morphine

Eliminate unnecessary medications

Sedative hypnotics, such as benzodiazepines (except in the case of alcohol withdrawal), anticholinergics, and antihistamines should be avoided if possible and used at the lowest effective dose. Narcotic use (intravenous or by mouth) should also be minimized; these medications increase the likelihood of delirium owing to direct CNS effects and any resultant urinary retention or constipation. All medications should be adjusted accordingly to renal function, and polypharmacy should be specifically

Regulation of bowel/bladder function

Constipation is commonly seen after the second postoperative day as a result of decreased mobility and perioperative use of narcotic analgesia. A bowel regimen of stool softeners and laxatives should be routine and titrated to bowel motions at least every 48 hours.51, 56

Bladder catheter removal should be prompted as early as possible, typically on postoperative day 1 when patients begin to mobilize out of bed. If urinary retention is encountered (patients unable to void 8 hours post–catheter

Adequate nutritional intake

Malnourishment occurs in up to 20% of patients with hip fractures.6, 24, 33 The hip fracture patient is predisposed to catabolism with an increased risk for protein-calorie malnutrition.25 Protein depletion is associated with poor wound healing and increased postoperative complications, including reduced survival at 1 year.1, 58 Low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL) and low total lymphocyte count (1,500 cells/μL) are associated with increased resource consumption, length of hospital stay and operative

Early mobilization and rehabilitation

Early mobilization within 24 hours after hip surgery is a standard practice. Self-mobilization should be encouraged depending on the clinical circumstances; an overhead trapeze frame may assist the patient in regaining earlier functional independence. In addition, overhead trapeze will reduce the force exerted on the hips upon patient transfer to a bedpan; these forces can be significant, estimated to be 4 times the body weight.56 Early mobilization not only reduces the risk for complications,

Early detection and treatment of major complications

Delirium may be the only manifestation of a life-threatening condition in the elderly patient. Clinicians must take a standardized approach to postoperative delirium such that myocardial infarction, hemorrhage, pneumonia, urosepsis, or VTE are not missed.51, 55 In a large study of 8,930 patients with hip fracture, 19% had postoperative complications, and cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 8% and 4%, respectively. Serious cardiac and pulmonary complications occurred in 2% and 3%,

Rehabilitation and recovery

Rehabilitation is fundamental after hip fracture and should start as soon as possible in the postoperative period. Early rehabilitation is associated with shorter hospital stay and decreased medical costs.1 After hospital discharge, ongoing long-term rehabilitation in a skilled nursing facility, a dedicated acute rehabilitation hospital, or on an outpatient basis is beneficial. Intense physical therapy (twice daily sessions) may help improve long-term outcomes.62 The intensity and length of

Summary

Medical management of the hip fracture patient has multiple components. Preoperative assessment and optimization along with appropriate timing of surgery and implementation of risk-reducing therapies should maximize outcomes. Postoperative complications are common, yet close monitoring and attention to the “hip fracture syndrome” should reduce morbidity. A process of care that includes hospitalist comanagement may be a useful model that addresses clinical issues in both the preoperative and

References (74)

  • A.F. Shorr et al.

    Venous thromboembolism after orthopedic surgery: Implications of the choice for prophylaxis

    Thromb Res

    (2007)
  • A.K. Jaffer et al.

    Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the geriatric patient

    Clin Geriatr Med

    (2006)
  • D. Feil et al.

    Cognitive impairment, chronic medical illness, and risk of mortality in an elderly cohort

    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • F.A. Michota et al.

    Perioperative management of the hospitalized patient

    Med Clin North Am

    (2002)
  • J. Tidermark et al.

    Effects of protein-rich supplementation and nandrolone in lean elderly women with femoral neck fractures

    Clin Nutr

    (2004)
  • H.K. Kamel

    Update on osteoporosis management in long-term care: Focus on bisphosphonates

    J Am Med Dir Assoc

    (2007)
  • J.D. Zuckerman

    Hip fracture

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • P. Haentjens et al.

    Costs and consequences of hip fracture occurrence in old age: an economic perspective

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2005)
  • F.D. Wolinsky et al.

    The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study

    Am J Public Health

    (1997)
  • R.S. Morrison et al.

    The medical consultant's role in caring for patients with hip fracture

    Ann Intern Med

    (1998)
  • H. Wan et al.

    U.S. census bureau, current population reports, 65+ in the United States

    (2005)
  • R. Hedlund et al.

    Trauma type, age, and gender as determinants of hip fracture

    J Orthop Res

    (1987)
  • S. Rose et al.

    Hip fractures. An epidemiological review

    Bull Hosp Jt Dis

    (1999)
  • S. Shabat

    Hip fractures in elderly patients—perspectives towards the future

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2005)
  • U. Bergstrom et al.

    Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umea, Sweden

    Osteoporos Int

    (2008)
  • D.J. Jacofsky et al.

    Management of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur: State of the art

    J Orthop Trauma

    (2004)
  • J. Magaziner et al.

    Excess mortality attributable to hip fracture in white women aged 70 years and older

    Am J Public Health

    (1997)
  • G. Pioli et al.

    Predictors of mortality after hip fracture: Results from 1-year follow-up

    Aging Clin Exp Res

    (2006)
  • J. Magaziner et al.

    Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study

    J Gerontol

    (1990)
  • S.K. Bonar et al.

    Factors associated with short- versus long-term skilled nursing facility placement among community-living hip fracture patients

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1990)
  • F. Michota et al.

    Patient education tool for the preoperative process and the role of the medical consultant

    Cleve Clin J Med

    (2006)
  • W.K. Barsoum et al.

    Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient

    Cleve Clin J Med

    (2006)
  • M.A. McLaughlin et al.

    Preoperative status and risk of complications in patients with hip fracture

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2006)
  • M. Garcia Lazaro et al.

    The role of malnutrition and other medical factors in the evolution of patients with hip fracture

    An Med Interna

    (2004)
  • M. Hedstrom et al.

    Metabolism and catabolism in hip fracture patients: nutritional and anabolic intervention––a review

    Acta Orthop

    (2006)
  • L.A. Beaupre et al.

    Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway

    Qual Saf Health Care

    (2006)
  • E.D. Perez

    Hip fracture: physicians take more active role in patient care

    Geriatrics

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text