The aesthetics of chemical biology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.10.025Get rights and content

Scientists and philosophers have long reflected on the place of aesthetics in science. In this essay, I review these discussions, identifying work of relevance to chemistry and, in particular, to the field of chemical biology. Topics discussed include the role of aesthetics in scientific theory choice, the aesthetics of molecular images, the beauty-making features of molecules, and the relation between the aesthetics of chemical biology and the aesthetics of industrial design.

Highlights

► Debate persists over the role of aesthetic factors in scientific theory choice. ► Aesthetics also figures in many other aspects of chemistry. ► The beauty of molecules raises special questions for aesthetics. ► The maxim ‘Form follows function’ is relevant to the aesthetics of molecules. ► Future applications will require a broader view of aesthetics in chemical biology.

Section snippets

The traditional debate

Most discussion of the role of aesthetics in science has focused on one branch of science—theoretical physics—and on one philosophical issue—the role of aesthetic factors in the choice between competing theories [7, 8]. This issue arises owing to the fact that our culture generally views science as a rational and empirical inquiry into natural processes. On this view, scientific theories win support based on their empirical accuracy and explanatory power. Yet, the history of science shows many

Aesthetics in chemistry

The debate concerning the role of aesthetics in theory choice has focused mainly on physics, but can be extended to theories within chemistry also [17••]. Within chemistry, however, aesthetic factors come into play in other ways as well, at the visible level of materials, such as crystals and liquids (see Figure 1; [22]) but also with regard to imperceptible molecules which chemists may regard as particularly beautiful. In these other contexts, the connection between truth and beauty is less of

Molecular delights

So what makes for beauty in a molecule? Chemists have offered lists of features that supposedly give a molecule aesthetic value [23••, 28, 29••]. To fully address the question, however, we need some account of what aesthetic value is. While philosophers disagree on this issue, a traditional and still widely accepted view holds that we can at least say that aesthetic value is distinct from other values such as ethical merit or usefulness. On this view, a painting may promote a morally

Form and function

What then are the features that make a molecule aesthetically appealing? Some molecules have striking geometrical features: consider the regularity and symmetry in a molecule such as dodecahedrane. There are also other formal properties, such as the tension of certain molecular structures “tightly wound and ready to spring into forms with lower energy states” [29••] or the complex repeated pattern of atoms in large molecules [23]. Other plausible beauty-making features cited by chemists include

From the invisible to the visible

The molecular realm thus offers a beguiling array of beauties for the chemist. It is sometimes objected that because appreciating this beauty requires specialized knowledge of chemistry, it is esoteric [22] or gnostic [28]. However, this is the case for much aesthetic appreciation of art as well. To fully appreciate works of religious art, or literature from other cultures or time periods, we often require knowledge of the relevant background.

The aesthetics of molecules could be said to be

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (43)

  • J. Wechsler

    On Aesthetics in Science

    (1978)
  • A. Tauber

    The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science

    (1996)
  • S. Chandrasekhar

    Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science

    (1987)
  • E.P. Fischer

    Beauty and the Beast: The Aesthetic Moment in Science

    (1999)
  • J. McAlister

    The aesthetics of science

    Int Stud Philos Sci

    (2002)
  • T. Spector et al.

    Aesthetics and visualization in chemistry

    Hyle

    (2003)
  • J. McAllister

    Is beauty a sign of truth in scientific theories?

    Am Scientist

    (1998)
  • J. McAllister

    Recent work on aesthetics of science

    Int Stud Philos Sci

    (2002)
  • W. De Regt

    Beauty in physical science circa 2000

    Int Stud Philos Sci

    (2002)
  • G. Engler

    Aesthetics in science and in art

    Br J Aesthetics

    (1990)
  • P. Dirac

    The evolution of the physicist's picture of nature

    Sci Am

    (1963)
  • R. Fry

    Art and Science

    Vision and Design

    (1960)
  • E. Zemach

    Truth and beauty

    Philosophical Forum

    (1986)
  • E. Zemach

    Real Beauty

    (1997)
  • P. Kivy

    Science and aesthetic appreciation

    Midwest Stud Philos

    (1991)
  • P. Kosso

    The omniscienter: beauty and scientific understanding

    Int Stud Philos Sci

    (2002)
  • J. McAllister

    Beauty and Revolution in Science

    (1996)
  • D. Davies

    McAllister's aesthetics in science: a critical notice

    Int Stud Philos Sci

    (1998)
  • W. De Regt

    Explaining the splendour of science

    Stud Hist Philos Sci

    (1998)
  • T. Kuipers

    Beauty: a road to truth

    Synthese

    (2002)
  • P. Thagard

    Why is beauty a road to the truth?

  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text