Elsevier

Brain Stimulation

Volume 15, Issue 3, May–June 2022, Pages 707-716
Brain Stimulation

Tolerability and feasibility of at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS): Single-center evidence from 6,779 sessions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.04.014Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Remotely supervised (RS-tDCS) is established for at-home tDCS in clinical trials.

  • We analyzed 6779 RS-tDCS sessions in 308 participants across Class I/II/III trials.

  • RS-tDCS is tolerable and feasible over extended and repeated applications.

  • Use of at-home RS-tDCS supports feasibility and scalability for RCTs.

  • Home-based tDCS provides a solution to complete Class I trial designs.

Abstract

Introduction

The ability to deploy transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home is a key usability advantage to support scaling for pivotal clinical trials. We have established a home-based tDCS protocol for use in clinical trials termed remotely supervised (RS)-tDCS.

Objective

To report the tolerability and feasibility of tDCS sessions completed to date using RS-tDCS in clinical trials.

Methods

We analyzed tolerability (i.e., adverse events, AEs) reported in six Class I/II/III trials using RS-tDCS to study symptom outcomes over 10 to 60 daily applications. Across the six clinical trials, 308 participants (18–78 years old) completed an average of 23 sessions for a total of 6779 RS-tDCS administrations. The majority of participants were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, and open-label trials included those diagnosed with a range of other conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease, post-stroke aphasia, traumatic brain injury, cerebellar ataxia), with minimum-to-severe neurologic disability. Clinical trial feasibility (i.e., treatment fidelity and blinding integrity) was examined using two Class I randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results

No serious AEs occurred. Across administrations, three sessions (0.04%) were aborted due to discomfort, but no participant discontinued due to tolerability. The AEs most commonly reported by participants were tingling (68%), itching (41%) and warmth sensation (42%) at the electrode site, and these were equally reported in active and sham tDCS conditions. The two Class I RCTs resulted in rapid enrollment, high fidelity to treatment completion, and blinding integrity.

Conclusions

At-home RS-tDCS is tolerable, including when used over extended periods of time. Home-based RS-tDCS is feasible and can enable Class I tDCS clinical trial designs.

Keywords

Transcranial direct current stimulation
tDCS
At-home
Remote
Feasibility
Tolerability

Cited by (0)