Elsevier

Brain Research Bulletin

Volume 66, Issues 4–6, 15 September 2005, Pages 484-490
Brain Research Bulletin

Review
The evolution of homeobox genes: Implications for the study of brain development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The homeobox gene superfamily includes many genes implicated in brain development in vertebrates; for example, the Otx, Emx, Dmbx, Gbx, En and Hox gene families. We describe the evolutionary history of the homeobox gene superfamily, as inferred from molecular phylogenetics and chromosomal mapping. Studies of amphioxus, a close relative of vertebrates, have proven particularly informative because it has a genome uncomplicated by recent lineage-specific gene duplications and because in situ hybridisation techniques exist for mapping gene positions and gene expression patterns. We describe an ancient subdivision into gene classes (ANTP, PRD, LIM, POU, SIN, TALE), each containing multiple gene families. The original ANTP class gene duplicated to give distinct NK-like and Hox/ParaHox-related genes, both of which underwent tandem duplication, before the expanding Hox gene cluster duplicated to give Hox and ParaHox clusters. A chromosomal breakage event probably occurred to separate the NK-like and extended Hox genes. Finally, there was additional and extensive gene duplication and gene loss in the vertebrate lineage. We argue that understanding evolutionary history is important for establishing consistent gene nomenclature, and for comparing gene expression patterns and gene functions between species and between gene families.

Introduction

Genes belonging to the homeobox superfamily are characterised by possession of a recognisable 180-nucleotide sequence (the homeobox) encoding a 60-amino acid motif known as the homeodomain. Many homeobox genes act as transcription factors regulating gene expression during developmental patterning or cell differentiation. Indeed, mutations in homeobox genes can cause dramatic changes to developmental programs in a wide range of organisms, including humans [1]. Considering the complexity of neural development in vertebrates, it is not surprising that homeobox genes have roles in the embryonic brain. Examples include the Otx and Emx family genes (Otx1, Otx2, Emx1, Emx2) implicated in forebrain and midbrain development, Dmbx1 in midbrain and hindbrain, Gbx, En and Pax-2/5/8 family genes in formation of the midbrain–hindbrain organiser region, and many Hox genes in hindbrain patterning.

Making sense of the bewildering diversity of homeobox genes, within the context of a dynamically changing and complex developing system, is a major challenge. We propose that taking an evolutionary approach can help make sense of diversity. Here we describe the diversity of homeobox genes, and demonstrate how molecular phylogenetic analyses combined with chromosomal mapping have provided a detailed insight into the evolutionary history of one group of homeobox genes: the ANTP class.

Section snippets

The diversity of homeobox genes

Secondary structure predictions, plus crystal structures, indicate that the homeodomain encodes three principal alpha helices; the more C-terminal two of which form a helix-turn-helix fold, while the more N-terminal helix lies across this fold, stabilising it [19]. The homeodomain motif confers DNA-binding properties to the protein, and many homeodomain proteins are known to be transcription factors regulating the activity of other genes. Homeobox genes must have originated early in eukaryotic

The diversity of ANTP class genes

The ANTP and PRD classes can be split, in turn, into subdivisions (Fig. 1). Most notably, molecular phylogenetics divides the ANTP class into the NK-like genes and the Hox/ParaHox-related group. These two groups can each be subdivided into a series of gene families, containing very closely related genes. For example, the Hox/ParaHox-related group in humans includes the Hox, Cdx, Gsx, Xlox, Evx, Mox, En, Gbx and Mnx gene families. Each gene family contains from one to several genes. Thus, the

Homeobox gene duplication in vertebrates

Most of the above inferences concerning the evolutionary history of homeobox genes have come from molecular phylogenetic analyses, based on homeodomain sequence similarities. Chromosomal position provides additional and complementary information. Tandem gene duplication is expected to result in physical linkage of genes, at least temporarily. In some cases, such as the well-known Hox genes, the physical linkage can remain very tight, due to functional constraints. In many other cases, there may

The origins of homeobox gene families

Can we use data on chromosomal position to make inferences about earlier events in homeobox gene evolution? In particular, can we determine how an original ANTP gave rise to the large number of distinct gene families in the earliest bilaterians animals (long before the origin of vertebrates)? Unfortunately, there is a problem with using data from the human genome to make inferences of this kind. The problem resides in the large-scale, or genome, duplications that occurred early in vertebrate

Implications for brain development and evolution

Knowledge of the evolutionary history of homeobox genes is important for several reasons, not least because it imposes a logical structure onto an otherwise mind-numbing list of genes. More importantly, we suggest that taking account of the evolutionary approach has important implications for understanding the roles of homeobox genes in brain development and evolution.

The first way in which an evolutionary approach is vital is as a basis for gene nomenclature. Only when we understand how genes

Acknowledgements

We thank Filipe Castro for suggesting the layout of Fig. 1. and David Ferrier for the AmphiMnx and AmphiEvxA photographs in Fig. 2. This research was funded by the Human Frontiers Science Program.

References (26)

  • N.M. Brooke et al.

    The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster

    Nature

    (1998)
  • T.R. Burglin

    A comprehensive classification of homeobox genes

  • L.F.C. Castro et al.

    Fluorescent in situ hybridisation to amphioxus chromosomes

    Zoolog. Sci.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text