Full Length ArticleResistive exercise in astronauts on prolonged spaceflights provides partial protection against spaceflight-induced bone loss
Introduction
Astronauts have served on the International Space Station (ISS) for durations of spaceflight mostly between 4 and 6 months where they have returned from long-duration space missions with lower areal bone mineral densities (aBMDs) compared to preflight, i.e., beyond the Least Significant Change (LSC) for DXA measurements at Johnson Space Center (JSC) [1]. Space, a weightless environment, appears to induce a musculoskeletal adaptation in astronauts that resembles the effects of immobilization or paralysis. The losses in bone mass during spaceflight are not stochastic, but appear to target skeletal sites that are weight-bearing on Earth, suggesting a primary role of biomechanics for skeletal adaptation in space. Overall, it is unclear as to what these spaceflight-induced changes mean to the affected astronaut in terms of fracture risk or impacts to long-term skeletal health.
In another report that focused on resistive exercise and nutrition as countermeasures to mitigate losses in aBMD during spaceflight, resistive exercise on the ARED (Advanced Resistive Exercise Device) was capable of maintaining, after typical 6-month spaceflights, the aBMD (group mean value ± SD) of astronauts at their preflight hip and the lumbar spine [2]; these observations with DXA densitometry suggested possible skeletal benefits with ARED and nutrition alone. The positive aBMD outcome using the ARED has been attributed to the ability to perform resistive exercise that more closely resembles weight-lifting in Earth's 1 g environment. This advanced capability included an increased loading capability (600 pound-force (lbf), or 2669 Newton (N)), and a higher ratio of eccentric to concentric loading than was possible with the previous exercise device (i.e., the interim resistive exercise device, or IRED) [3]. The IRED, in contrast, provided a maximum resistance of only 300 lbf or 1334 N which appears to be insufficient mechanical loading in astronauts to preserve skeletal mass during spaceflight or to facilitate recovery after spaceflight [4,5].
Despite findings with DXA measures that show that the development of osteoporosis (T score <−2.5) did not occur in astronauts after ~6-month spaceflights [6], there are spaceflight-induced changes to bone that have raised concern that the degree of bone loss may be deleterious and that its prevention would be desirable [7]. Collective evidence substantiate i) perturbed bone remodeling during spaceflight with bone resorption increased and uncoupled from bone formation [6,8,9], ii) bone loss still evident in some astronauts who are using ARED (this paper and confidential medical communication) and iii) an associated bone loss that is accelerated relative to bone loss due to aging [1,5,7]. Specifically, the calculated average of hip trabecular vBMD loss over 6 months from reported population data is ~0.4% which is ~20-fold less than the average hip trabecular vBMD loss over 6 months reported for crewmembers using exercise alone (ARED only, no bisphosphonates) in this report. Moreover, it has not been possible to predict which astronauts might lose bone from the data acquired to-date from ~70 long-duration astronauts.
Previously, we have described that 70 mg/week of alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate (Bis), appeared to attenuate BMD loss in astronauts, to prevent an elevation of biomarkers for bone resorption, and to reduce the typically increased urinary excretion of calcium during spaceflight [10]. However, the effects of alendronate were obscured because ISS astronauts who were taking alendronate concurrently performed resistive exercise on the ARED. From the perspective of mission operations and for the planning of missions beyond low-Earth orbit, it is important to delineate whether the postflight benefits observed in the Bis+ARED group can be achieved with ARED alone since each countermeasure is associated with its own in-flight risks and/or requirements for implementation.
To this end, we conducted two flight investigations. One study reported the anti-resorptive effect of a bisphosphonate in space in combination with ARED [10]. The other flight study, described here in, investigated the efficacy of ARED in the absence of a bisphosphonate as a strategy to prevent bone loss during spaceflight. We hypothesized that ARED alone would not completely protect astronauts against bone loss because of an inability to mitigate bone resorption and this inability would be detected by QCT measurement of trabecular bone, a bone sub-region that is sensitive to osteoclast activity.
Section snippets
Subjects
Following approval by the Institutional Review Boards of NASA and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), a total of 20 astronauts signed informed consent to participate in the Bisphosphonate flight study. Ten astronauts had originally signed up to take alendronate (Bis+ARED, n = 10) and the study results have been previously reported [10]. Ten additional ISS astronauts signed up for exercise on the ARED only (ARED, n = 10) with no ingestion of alendronate. Densitometry and biochemical data,
Subjects
As previously reported, 3 subjects of the Bis+ARED group terminated study participation with 2 of the 3 subjects withdrawing due to gastric issues; none of the subsequent analyses included data from these 3 subjects. Following spaceflight, photographs of tablet blister cards, for the 7 subjects who completed the study, indicated that on-average 98% of the alendronate pills were dispensed [10].
Comparison of demographic data was conducted (Table 2) with no significant difference between groups as
Biomarkers of bone turnover
Results of serum and urinary measures related to bone turnover are shown below in Table 4 and in Fig. 6a and b for the ARED and Bis+ARED groups only. Within-group analyses (i.e., preflight to timepoint change) conducted on markers of bone resorption – Urinary N-telopeptide (NTX) (Fig. 6a) and serum CTX-β (Table 4) – detected significantly elevated levels during spaceflight in the ARED subjects which were also significantly greater compared to levels in Bis+ARED subjects at corresponding time
Discussion
The purpose of this extended investigation of skeletal outcomes after spaceflight was to delineate the effects of resistive exercise from the combined benefits of a bisphosphonate and resistive exercise in astronauts during spaceflight. It was previously reported that resistive exercise on the ARED during ~6 month spaceflight aboard the ISS can maintain the group mean values of preflight aBMDs in the astronauts (n = 5–7) [2]. In contrast, this study of ARED only, as an in-flight countermeasure
Funding
The research reported in this paper was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA).
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Mark Guilliams, Bruce Nieschwitz and David Hoellen (Astronaut Strength, Conditioning and Rehabilitation Specialists) for directing the preflight, inflight and postflight resistive exercise program for the astronauts in this study as well as thank Dr. Harlan Evans, Lisa King, Scott A. Smith and Greg Yardley who helped acquire the densitometry data by DXA and QCT. Finally, the authors extend a special thanks to those astronaut volunteers who consented to participate in
References (31)
- et al.
Bone metabolism and renal stone risk during International Space Station missions
Bone
(2015) - et al.
Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis
Bone
(2006) - et al.
Individual and combined effects of exercise and alendronate on bone mass and strength in ovariectomized rats
Bone
(2007) - et al.
Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice
Mayo Clin. Proc.
(2008) - et al.
Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study
Bone
(2013) - et al.
Bone mineral and lean tissue loss after long duration space flight
J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact.
(2000) - et al.
Benefits for bone from resistance exercise and nutrition in long-duration spaceflight: evidence from biochemistry and densitometry
J. Bone Miner. Res.
(2012) - et al.
Musculoskeletal adaptations to training with the advanced resistive exercise device
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
(2011) - et al.
Adaptation of the proximal femur to skeletal reloading after long-duration spaceflight
J. Bone Miner. Res.
(2006) - et al.
Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight
J. Bone Miner. Res.
(2004)