Elsevier

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Volume 174, 15 February 2021, 112768
Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Real-time nanoplasmonic sensing of three-dimensional morphological changes in a supported lipid bilayer and antimicrobial testing applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112768Get rights and content

Abstract

We report the development of a real-time localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) biosensing strategy to detect three-dimensional morphological changes in a supported lipid bilayer (SLB) on a plasmonic substrate. The sensing concept advances on past efforts to detect subtle conformational changes in adsorbed biomacromolecules by demonstrating the capability to track large-scale, complex adsorbate shape changes and to classify different types of shape changes based on specific, multi-step measurement signatures. To validate this concept, we tested the addition of antimicrobial fatty acids, monoglycerides, and surfactants in micellar form to the SLB platform, which triggered specific three-dimensional membrane morphological changes such as tubule or bud formation along with solubilization. Experimentally, the different remodeling events were detected by distinct measurement signatures related to the shape and size of lipid protrusions that formed and evolved over time, which agreed well with a newly developed theoretical model. Our conceptual approach and formalism are applicable to various biosensing techniques, including not only LSPR but also surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. These sensing capabilities are advantageous for evaluating the mechanisms of antimicrobial drug candidates and other membrane-active compounds, and the measurement strategy is extendable to a wide range of biomimetic lipid compositions.

Introduction

There is broad interest in developing real-time biosensing strategies to characterize cell-membrane-mimicking supported lipid bilayer (SLB) interactions with a wide range of biomacromolecules and biological nanoparticles, such as peptides, proteins, micelles, exosomes, and virus particles, as well as with drug delivery vehicles, e.g., liposomes and lipid nanoparticles (Buck et al., 2019; Han et al., 2019; Nishio et al., 2020; Park et al., 2019). One of the most challenging measurement aspects is to track SLB morphological changes, which result from biomacromolecular interactions and are relevant to various biological phenomena and pharmaceutical drug testing applications. Key examples include cholesterol-induced membrane remodeling and three-dimensional crystallization (Lee et al., 2020; Rahimi et al., 2016; Varsano et al., 2015), and antiviral drug development to inhibit membrane-associated viral genome replication (Cho et al., 2010, 2016). Currently used biosensing techniques include surface plasmon resonance (SPR) (Ryu et al., 2019; Soler et al., 2018), total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy (Mapar et al., 2018), evanescent light scattering (Agnarsson et al., 2016), and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) (Di Iorio et al., 2020), which all have penetration depths of about 100–250 nm while the SLB thickness is much shorter (~5 nm). On the other hand, nanoplasmonic sensors can exhibit penetration depths of ~20 nm or less that are more comparable to the SLB thickness and thus potentially more sensitive to membrane morphological changes (Bruzas et al., 2016; Jose et al., 2013; Oh and Altug, 2018).

While nanoplasmonic sensing experiments are typically conducted on metal nanoparticle surfaces, indirect nanoplasmonic sensing (INPS) platforms enable the use of silica-coated gold nanodisk arrays on which SLBs can readily form (Langhammer et al., 2010). The embedded nanodisks exhibit localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), whereby light extinction induces the collective oscillation of conduction-band electrons within the nanodisk that gives rise to an enhanced electromagnetic field in close proximity to the silica coating, which is the active sensing interface (Dahlin et al., 2013; Jackman et al., 2017a; Unser et al., 2015). This field is scattered by adsorbate molecules that induce changes in collective electromagnetic oscillations. Physically, this sensing concept is similar to SPR and the main difference is in the type of evanescent field that is generated by the sensor (exponential in the SPR case vs. dipole-like in the LSPR case) and the degree of surface sensitivity. Experimentally, the LSPR sensing approach has been widely utilized to detect subtle conformational changes involving adsorbed liposomes, SLBs, and proteins that can be modeled as a uniform film or spherically shaped objects (Ferhan et al., 2018; Jackman et al., 2017b, Jackman et al., 2017c). However, various types of biologically relevant biomacromolecular interactions involve more complex, non-uniform adsorbate shape changes and there is an outstanding need to develop advanced nanoplasmonic sensing approaches to track such changes.

Herein, using a combination of experimental and theoretical approaches, we developed a real-time LSPR biosensing strategy to detect and classify complex adsorbate shape changes based on proof-of-concept experiments involving three-dimensional membrane morphological changes in an SLB platform. Specifically, we evaluated the LSPR measurement responses that occur when membrane-active, antimicrobial compounds interact with an SLB platform on a silica-coated gold nanodisk array and give rise to complex, dynamic changes in three-dimensional membrane morphology. The test compounds included two of the most biologically active fatty acids and monoglycerides termed lauric acid (LA) and glycerol monolaurate (GML), respectively, along with a related surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), all of which demonstrate potent antimicrobial effects by disrupting the lipid membranes surrounding bacteria and enveloped viruses (Yoon et al., 2018). The mechanistic details of how each compound disrupts phospholipid membranes remain under investigation and we demonstrate how the LSPR technique is well-suited to address this measurement need as well as its compelling advantages compared to other biosensing techniques used in past works. Furthermore, the sensing concepts developed in our work and the underlying theoretical formalism are broadly useful for not only LSPR measurements but also readily extendable to the SPR and TIRF microscopy techniques as well.

Section snippets

Reagents

Stock solutions of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) and 1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DHPC) lipids in chloroform were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). SDS and LA in lyophilized form were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). GML in lyophilized form was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). An aqueous buffer solution consisting of 10 mM Tris [pH 7.5] with 150 mM NaCl was used and prepared with deionized water (>18 MΩ cm).

SLB fabrication

DOPC SLBs were

LSPR sensing experiments

We conducted LSPR experiments using a silica-coated gold nanodisk array upon which a fluid-phase DOPC SLB coating was fabricated and served as the biosensing interface (Fig. 1a). The gold nanodisk transducers had diameter and height of around 100 and 20 nm, respectively. Transmission-mode optical extinction measurements showed that the silica-coated gold nanodisk array on a glass substrate, which was housed within a microfluidic chamber, had an ensemble-average, maximum-intensity LSPR

Conclusions

In this study, we have shown that real-time LSPR measurements can distinguish and track distinct types of three-dimensional membrane morphological changes in an SLB adsorbate based on the corresponding measurement signatures provided the scale of sizes of the corresponding structures is known. While it has been recently shown that LSPR measurements can detect subtle conformational changes in adsorbed biomacromolecules that can be treated analytically as uniform films or spherically shaped

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Bo Kyeong Yoon: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Hyeonjin Park: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Vladimir P. Zhdanov: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Joshua A. Jackman: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Nam-Joon Cho: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1C1C1004385), and by the Korea Research Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2019H1D3A1A01070318). Schematic illustrations were created with BioRender.com under an academic lab subscription.

References (39)

  • D. Di Iorio et al.

    Chem. Sci.

    (2020)
  • W.B. Han et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron

    (2019)
  • M. Nishio et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron

    (2020)
  • Y. Park et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron

    (2019)
  • M. Rahimi et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (2016)
  • Y.-S. Ryu et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron

    (2019)
  • B. Agnarsson et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2016)
  • I. Bruzas et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2016)
  • J. Buck et al.

    ACS Nano

    (2019)
  • N.-J. Cho et al.

    Sci. Transl. Med.

    (2010)
  • N.-J. Cho et al.

    ACS Cent. Sci.

    (2016)
  • A.B. Dahlin et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2006)
  • A.B. Dahlin et al.

    Nanophotonics

    (2013)
  • A.R. Ferhan et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2018)
  • J.A. Jackman et al.

    Langmuir

    (2020)
  • J.A. Jackman et al.

    Langmuir

    (2014)
  • J.A. Jackman et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2016)
  • J.A. Jackman et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2017)
  • J.A. Jackman et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Dynamic remodeling of giant unilamellar vesicles induced by monoglyceride nano-micelles: Insights into supramolecular organization

      2021, Applied Materials Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      Notably, current evidence supports that fatty acids and monoglycerides are mainly active in supramolecular structures such as self-assembled micellar nanostructures or encapsulated within fusogenic liposomal bilayers [9-11], while the monomer building blocks are appreciably less membrane-disruptive by themselves. Experimentally, the main strategy to investigate the interactions of fatty acid and monoglyceride micellar nanostructures with phospholipid membranes has been two-dimensional (2D) supported lipid bilayers (SLBs), which are cell-membrane-mimicking platforms that are compatible with a wide range of surface-sensitive measurement techniques [12,13] and have gained attention as robust platforms for applied material science investigations [14,15]. Such approaches have proven useful because the SLBs are tightly confined and undergo distinct three-dimensional (3D) membrane morphological changes when specific fatty acids or monoglycerides are added and induce strain, providing the first evidence to show that fatty acids and monoglycerides disrupt phospholipid membranes in distinct ways [16].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text