Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 102, Issue 20, October 2011, Pages 9788-9793
Bioresource Technology

Effect of hot water extraction and liquid hot water pretreatment on the fungal degradation of biomass feedstocks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Exhaustive hot water extraction (HWE) and liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment were evaluated for their effects on degradation of biomass feedstocks (i.e., corn stover, wheat straw, and soybean straw) by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora. HWE (85 °C for 10 min) partially removed water soluble extractives and subsequently improved fungal degradation on wheat straw while it had little or no effect on the fungal degradation of corn stover and soybean straw. In contrast, LHW pretreatment at 170 °C for 3 min improved the fungal degradation of soybean straw; thus, lignin removal of 36.70% and glucose yield of 64.25% were obtained from the combined LHW and fungal pretreatment. However, corn stover, which was effectively degraded by fungal pretreatment alone, was less affected by this combined pretreatment. Our results indicated that a HWE or LHW pretreatment conducted under mild conditions worked synergistically with fungal degradation for some recalcitrant feedstocks.

Highlights

► Fungal pretreatment with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora was more effective to corn stover than wheat straw and soybean straw. ► Exhaustive hot water extraction substantially improved the fungal degradation of wheat straw, but not of soybean straw. ► Liquid hot water pretreatment at the elevated pressure substantially improved the fungal degradation of soybean straw.

Introduction

It has been reported that microbial pretreatment with white rot fungi under solid state fermentation effectively improved enzymatic hydrolysis of various biomass feedstocks (e.g., hardwood, corn stover, and switchgrass) (Wan and Li, 2011) .The advantages of microbial pretreatment include low energy input, little or no use of chemicals, and no waste stream output. However, microbial pretreatment has inherent problems, such as long pretreatment time and simultaneous degradation of carbohydrates and lignin. Our previous study showed that some biomass feedstocks, such as soybean straw and wheat straw, were strongly resistant to fungal degradation, even with the addition of nutrients and enzyme inducers (Wan and Li, 2011). Combined pretreatment can potentially overcome the problems associated with physical and chemical pretreatments alone, such as intensive energy use, severe pretreatment conditions, high chemical loading, and toxicity of the waste stream. These benefits have been demonstrated for biopulping technologies, where fungal pretreatment with white rot fungi is widely applied along with mechanical or chemical pulping (Akhtar et al., 1998, Kang et al., 2003). Most importantly, the combined pretreatment process could result in a synergistic effect, improving the yields of end products.

Several studies have investigated a combination of fungal pretreatment with one of the other types of pretreatment methods for biomass. The results showed that combined pretreatments improved enzymatic hydrolysis and biofuel production when compared to a single pretreatment process. Fungal pretreatment with Ceriporiopsis subvermispora followed by ethanolysis was found to substantially increase ethanol yield of woody biomass over ethanolysis alone (Baba et al., 2011, Itoh et al., 2003). Similarly, fungal pretreatment followed by steam explosion further increased saccharification of beech wood meal by about 10% (Sawada et al., 1995). Yu et al. (2008) tested fungal pretreatment of ultrasonic- or H2O2-pretreated rice hulls and found that the combined pretreatment resulted in increased lignin degradation and enzymatic hydrolysis yield. Kadimaliev et al. (2003) found that modification of birch and pine sawdust by ultrasound accelerated lignin degradation by Panus tigrinus. Combined fungal pretreatment with mild alkaline pretreatment of corn stover was also shown to enhance delignification and xylan removal as well as glucose yield (Yu et al., 2010). The ethanol yield of water hyacinth pretreated with combined fungal and dilute acid pretreatment was 1–2 folds higher than that obtained from dilute acid pretreatment alone (Ma et al., 2010).

Liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment has been one of the leading pretreatment methods for improving cellulose digestibility of lignocellulosic materials (Mosier et al., 2005b). This method, generally conducted at elevated temperatures (120–260 °C), is regarded as an environmentally-friendly pretreatment process because no chemicals are used (Kim et al., 2009, Weil et al., 1998). Water and acetyl groups within hemicelluloses, which act as acids at around 200 °C, are believed to catalyze extensive hydrolysis of hemicellulose to its component sugars, primarily xylose. The effectiveness of LHW pretreatment on cellulose digestibility is strongly related to pretreatment severity. Severe pretreatment conditions, which result in accumulation of organic acids and, subsequently, an acidic environment, cause degradation of monomeric sugars present in the liquid fraction to compounds inhibitory to ethanol fermentation (e.g., hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF), furfural, formic acid, levulinic acid) (Weil et al., 1998). The pH controlled LHW pretreatment can prevent degradation of fermentable sugars but involves the use of a base (Mosier et al., 2005b). To eliminate the use of chemicals while minimizing the degradation of fermentable sugars, LHW pretreatment conducted at less severe conditions can be followed by other pretreatment methods. Inoue et al. (2008) reported that ball milling combined with hot-compressed water treatment of Eucalyptus reduced energy usage during pretreatment and enzyme loading for enzymatic hydrolysis. The combination of LHW pretreatment and fungal pretreatment has not been reported.

It was the goal of this study to investigate the synergistic effects of hydrothermal pretreatments and fungal pretreatment on degradation of biomass. Two uncatalyzed hydrothermal methods, HWE and LHW pretreatments, were compared. Their effects on the modification of the chemical compositions of plant cell walls and improvement on glucose yields were also investigated.

Section snippets

Raw materials

Crop residues including corn stover, wheat straw, and soybean straw were obtained from the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC) farm in Wooster, Ohio. The feedstocks were oven-dried at 40 °C and then ground in a Wiley mill to pass through a 5 mm screen. The ground feedstocks were stored at room temperature prior to use.

Fungus and inoculum preparation

C. subvermispora (ATCC 96608) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained on malt extract agar (MEA, 2% w/v) at 4 °C. The

Degradation

Our previous study showed that fungal degradation on untreated wheat straw and soybean straw was lower compared to other feedstocks such as corn stover and switchgrass (Wan and Li, 2011). Since extractives accounted for more than 10% in these two feedstocks (data not shown), it was our hypothesis that removal of extractives may facilitate fungal attack. A simplified exhaustive HWE, therefore, was used to partially remove water soluble components from biomass. As expected, HWE alone did not

Conclusions

HWE significantly improved the fungal degradation of wheat straw while it was less effective to corn stover and not effective to soybean straw. The sugar yield of combined HWE and fungal pretreated wheat straw was double that of the untreated wheat straw, which indicated that water extractives in wheat straw could partially contribute to recalcitrance to C. subvermispora. LHW pretreatment facilitated fungal degradation of soybean straw, resulting in lignin degradation comparable to that of corn

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from North Central Sun Grant Program (No. GRT00013735), U.S.Department of Agriculture (USDA CSREES 2008-38814-04729), and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Seeds Program. The authors wish to thank Mrs. Mary Wicks (Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, OSU) for reading through the manuscript and providing useful suggestions.

References (30)

Cited by (62)

  • Direct consolidated bioprocessing for D-glucaric acid production from lignocellulose under subcritical water pretreatment

    2023, Chemical Engineering Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    SCWP is a novel, clean and environmentally friendly pretreatment technology [49,53,54], thus used in this work to pretreat CS, WS, RS and SG. SCWP deconstructed the hemicellulose, decreased degree of polymerization, transformed cellulose type, caused surface cracks and trenches, and increased specific surface area, thereby improving the enzymatic digestibility of the pretreated material and promoting its biological utilization [48,52,61,62]. We followed the pretreatment conditions reported by the literatures and optimized them for each feedstock [48–50].

  • Sugar production from husk coffee using combined pretreatments

    2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
  • Fiber degradation and carbohydrate production by combined biological and chemical/physicochemical pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass – A review

    2021, Bioresource Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, combined pretreated corn stover showed a drastic increase in glucose yield as compared to HWE pretreated biomass but a slight decrease compared to fungal pretreated biomass. Thus, their research indicated how different biomasses show different pretreatment efficiency to the same combined pretreatment method (Wan and Li, 2011). Martín-Sampedro et al. (2015) used highly specific endophytic fungi with a mild autohydrolysis process to enhance saccharification of Eucalyptus globulus wood.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text