Elsevier

Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Volume 97, January 2018, Pages 225-232
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy

Review
Immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a potent alternative therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.100Get rights and content

Abstract

The standard therapy of AML for many years has been chemotherapy with or without stem transplantation. However, there has not been any tangible improvement in this treatment beyond induction through chemotherapy and consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplantation or chemotherapy. Residual AML cells which later cause relapse mostly persist even after rigorous standard therapy. It is imperative therefore to find an alternative therapy that can take care of the residual AML cells. With a better understanding of how the immune system works to destroy tumor cells and inhibit their growth, another therapeutic option immunotherapy has emerged to address the difficulties associated with the standard therapy. Identification of leukemia-associated antigens (LAA) and the fact that T and NK cells can be activated to exert cytotoxicity on AML cells have further introduced diverse immunotherapeutic development strategies. This review discusses the merits of current immunotherapeutic strategies such as the use of antibodies, adoptive T cells and alloreactive NK cell, and vaccination as against the standard therapy of AML.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) also called acute myelocytic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia, acute granulocytic leukemia, or acute non-lymphocytic leukemia is a kind of leukemia that starts in the myeloid cells. These cells are capable of self-renewing and sustaining malignant populations as well as producing subclones [1]. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is considered acute because it progresses quickly if no suitable intervention is found, and can be very fatal in a short period [2]. Available data point to the fact that AML is the most common acute leukemia among adults, and its incidence increases with age [3], [4]. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is reported to account for roughly 1.2% of cancer deaths in the United States although relatively rare [5], [6]. Notwithstanding, the incidence of AML is expected to increase as the population ages. Considering these alarming indicators, it is imperative to devote time and resources in finding appropriate interventions, and creating awareness.

The symptoms of AML are as a result of the replacement of normal bone marrow with leukemic cells which causes a drop in red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets [7], [8]. Early and common symptoms associated with AML are fatigue, dypnoea, ostealgia, arthralgia, hemorrhage, and increased risk of infection [9]. There are other signs which are peculiar to the individual. Typical example is the swelling of the gingivae which may be experienced by some patients due to infiltration of leukemic cells into the gum tissue [10]. Interestingly, some patients do not exhibit any of these symptoms, therefore the condition is discovered accidentally during a routine blood test. A number of risk factors have been implicated in AML development, however, blood disorders, chemical exposures, ionizing radiation, and genetics are the most cited risk factors [11].

Treatment of AML is divided into induction phase and consolidation phase. Induction phase of AML treatment seeks to clear the blood of blasts and reduce the number of blasts in the bone marrow. Currently, the induction phase involves high dose induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline [12], [13], [14]. Consolidation chemotherapy is then administered to destroy residual leukemic cells after the patient has recovered from induction [15]. Although chemotherapy with remission and induction phases is the first option, this treatment mode is usually associated with high toxicity and high risk of relapse [16]. This is because, the AML stem cell is reportedly resistant to chemotherapy and responds to different selection pressures from chemotherapeutic drugs [17], [18]. Stress cells including cancer cells express stress proteins which are recognized by the immune system through immunosurveillance. This leads to the elimination of these stress cells. Nevertheless, cancer cells are able to escape this immunosurveillance through various mechanisms including the shedding of the stress proteins [19], [20]. Therefore, for cancer conditions such as AML, the best therapeutic option is immunotherapy, where specific immune cells are activated to re-establish the immunosurvielling activity of the immune system against these cancer cells.

Unlike chemotherapy and radiotherapy, immunotherapy is more specific in its activity and therefore associated with low toxicity [21]. This specificity is the core of immunotherapy that eliminates cancer cells without harming normal cells. Immunotherapeutic agents specifically inhibit cancer cell proliferation, recruit effector cells to eliminate the cancer cells or induce apoptosis in the cancer cells [22]. More importantly, many suitable AML associated antigens that can be targeted by immunotherapy to exert its activity have been identified, translating into construction and production of more efficient immunotherapeutic agents.

Section snippets

Chemotherapy, the common treatment option for AML

Chemotherapy is the use of anticancer drugs for the treatment of cancer condition such as AML. It is the standard treatment option because chemotherapeutic drugs are readily available and affordable. More common routes of drug administration include intravenous, intrathechal or subcutaneous. Administration can also be done orally [23]. These drugs have high bioavailability and thus, are able to spread throughout the body, making it useful for the treatment of cancers such as AML. Chemotherapy

Immunotherapy as alternative treatment for AML

Immunotherapy also known as targeted therapy is arguably the most effective intervention for AML. Cancers including AML can only progress if they are able to escape the immunosurveillance of the immune system [38]. Stress cells including these cancer cells express stress proteins that stimulates the immune system into action. These stress proteins are specific and therefore attract the attention of specific immune cells. Specific immune cells are able to recognize these stress proteins and are

Conclusion

Immunotherapies for AML have achieved some level of success in the various trials. Studies in this field have progressed and demonstrated that immunotherapy is a potential alternative to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of AML. Considering the fact that many antigen-specific immunotherapeutics are currently under development, more potent immunotherapeutics will soon be available for the AML treatment. Another critical fact that has surfaced following many years of investigation is

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article.

Acknowledgement

We appreciated the valuable contributions of Prof Zhang Juan and Prof Wang Ming of Antibody Engineering Laboratory, School of Life Science Technology, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

References (106)

  • G.S. Laszlo et al.

    The past and future of CD33 as therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood Rev.

    (2014)
  • J.M. Pagel et al.

    131I–anti-CD45 antibody plus busulfan and cyclophosphamide before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission

    Blood

    (2006)
  • A. Martner et al.

    Immunotherapeutic strategies for relapse control in acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood Rev.

    (2013)
  • A. Curti et al.

    Successful transfer of alloreactive haploidentical KIR ligand-mismatched natural killer cells after infusion in elderly high risk acute myeloid leukemia patients

    Blood

    (2011)
  • S. Cooley et al.

    Donor selection for natural killer cell receptor genes leads to superior survival after unrelated transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    Blood

    (2010)
  • M. Coppage et al.

    In vitro generation of tumor specific T cells that recognize a shared antigen of AML: Molecular characterization of TCR genes

    Leuk. Res.

    (2007)
  • B. Seliger et al.

    Ferrone S: HLA-G and MIC. expression in tumors and their role in anti-tumor immunity

    Trends Immunol.

    (2003)
  • I. Roeder et al.

    New experimental and theoretical investigations of hematopoietic stem cells and chronic myeloid leukemia

    Blood Cells. Mol. Dis.

    (2009)
  • M. Schmitt et al.

    RHAMM-R3 peptide vaccination in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and multiple myeloma elicits immunologic and clinical responses

    Blood

    (2008)
  • P.G. Maslak et al.

    Vaccination with synthetic analog peptides derived from WT1 oncoprotein induces T-cell responses in patients with complete remission from acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (2010)
  • L. Li et al.

    Epstein-barr virus inhibits the development of dendritic cells by promoting apoptosis of their monocyte precursors in the presence of granulocyte macrophage–colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-4

    Blood

    (2002)
  • H. Sato et al.

    Ito K: DNMT3A and TET2 in the pre-leukemic phase of hematopoietic disorders

    Front. Oncol.

    (2016)
  • H. Kantarjian

    Acute myeloid leukemia—major progress over four decades and glimpses into the future

    Am. J. Hematol.

    (2016)
  • W. Irish et al.

    Acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective claims analysis of resource utilization and expenditures for newly diagnosed patients from first-line induction to remission and relapse

    Curr. Med. Res. Opin.

    (2017)
  • R.L. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2015

    CA. Cancer J. Clin.

    (2015)
  • E. Ward et al.

    Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014

    CA. Cancer J. Clin.

    (2014)
  • H.R. Gittleman et al.

    Trends in central nervous system tumor incidence relative to other common cancers in adults, adolescents, and children in the United States, 2000 to 2010

    Cancer

    (2015)
  • D.A. Arber et al.

    The revision to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia

    Blood

    (2016)
  • T. Zhou et al.

    Context matters distinct disease outcomes as a result of crebbp hemizygosity in different mouse bone marrow compartments

    PLoS One

    (2016)
  • A.S. Davis et al.

    Mead MD: leukemia an overview for primary care

    Am. Fam. Physician

    (2014)
  • V. Singh et al.

    Hospital based study of dengue hemorrhagic fever in western uttar pradesh region

    Int. J. Sci. Study

    (2014)
  • S.E. Puumala et al.

    Epidemiology of childhood acute myeloid leukemia

    Pediatri. Blood Cancer

    (2013)
  • H. Serve et al.

    Sorafenib in combination with intensive chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2013)
  • L. Crucitti et al.

    Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome of leukemia relapses with loss of the mismatched HLA after partially incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    Leukemia

    (2015)
  • C. Chan et al.

    Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation in response to cellular stress

    Cell Death Differ.

    (2014)
  • M.G. Morvan et al.

    NK cells and cancer: you can teach innate cells new tricks

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2016)
  • T.C. Gangadhar et al.

    Mitigating the toxic effects of anticancer immunotherapy

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2014)
  • P. Gotwals et al.

    Prospects for combining targeted and conventional cancer therapy with immunotherapy

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2017)
  • M.K. Lee et al.

    Genetic association of PARP15 polymorphisms with clinical outcome of acute myeloid leukemia in a korean population

    Genetic Test. Mol Biomarkers

    (2016)
  • W. Fiedler et al.

    A phase I/II study of sunitinib and intensive chemotherapy in patients over 60 years of age with acute myeloid leukaemia and activating FLT3 mutations

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (2015)
  • A. Pluta et al.

    Addition of cladribine to the standard induction treatment improves outcomes in a subset of elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. Results of a randomized Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) phase II trial

    Am. J. Hematol.

    (2017)
  • F. Huguet et al.

    Clofarabine for the treatment of adult acute lymphoid leukemia: the group for research on adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia intergroup

    Leuk. Lymphoma

    (2015)
  • G. Kaspers

    How I treat paediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (2014)
  • F. Guolo et al.

    Intesive fludarabine-high dose cytarabine-idarubicin combination as induction therapy with risk-adapted consolidation may improve treatment efficacy in younger Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients: rationales, evidences and future perspectives

    BioScience Trends

    (2017)
  • M.H. Kirschbaum et al.

    A phase 2 study of belinostat (PXD101) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia or patients over the age of 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a California Cancer Consortium Study

    Leuk. Lymphoma

    (2014)
  • A.K. Burnett et al.

    Optimization of chemotherapy for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the medical research council AML15 trial

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2013)
  • S. Bernard et al.

    Pediatric Leukemia Diagnosis to Treatment–a review

    J. Cancer Clin. Trials

    (2017)
  • G.F. Weber

    Drugs That Suppress Proliferation In: Molecular Therapies of Cancer

    (2015)
  • L. Iversen
    (2016)
  • M.S. Aslam et al.

    Side effects of chemotherapy in cancer patients and evaluation of patients opinion about starvation based differential chemotherapy

    J. Cancer Ther.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text