Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 32, Issue 33, November 2011, Pages 8730-8742
Biomaterials

Structural contributions of blocked or grafted poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) on PEGylated polycaprolactone nanoparticles in siRNA delivery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.089Get rights and content

Abstract

The multiformity in polymer structure and conformation design provides a great potential in improving the gene silencing efficiency of siRNA by polymer vectors. In order to provide information on the polymer design for siRNA delivery, the structural contributions of blocked or grafted poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) on PEGylated polycaprolactone nanoparticles (NPs) in siRNA delivery were studied. Herein, two kinds of self-assembly nanoparticles (NPs) formed by amphiphilic cationic polymers, methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polycaprolactone-block-poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (mPEG-PCL-b-PDMAEMA, PECbD) and methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-(polycaprolactone-graft-poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)) (mPEG-PCL-g-PDMAEMA, PECgD), were used to deliver siRNA for in vitro and in vivo studies. The physiochemical properties including size and zeta potential of PECbD NPs/siRNA and PECgD NPs/siRNA complexes were characterized. In vitro cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and siRNA knockdown efficiency were evaluated in HeLa-Luc cells. The endosome escape and intracellular distribution of PECbD NPs/siRNA and PECgD NPs/siRNA in HeLa-Luc cells were also observed. In vivo polymer mediated siRNA delivery and the complexes distribution in isolated organs were studied using mice and tumor-bearing mice. At the same total degree of polymerization (DP) of DMAEMA, PECgD NPs/siRNA complexes possessed higher zeta potentials than PECbD NPs/siRNA complexes (at the same N/P ratio), which may be the reason that PECgD NPs/siRNA complexes can deliver more siRNA into the cytoplasm and lead to higher in vitro luciferase and lamin A/C silencing efficiency than PECbD NPs/siRNA complexes. The in vivo imaging measurement and histochemical analysis also confirmed that siRNA could be delivered to lungs, livers, pancreas and HeLa-Luc tumors more efficiently by PECgD NPs than PECbD NPs. Meanwhile, the PDMAEMA chains of PECgD could be shortened which provides benefits for clearing. Therefore, PECgD NPs have great potential to be used as efficient non-viral carriers for in vivo siRNA delivery.

Introduction

RNA interference, a natural mechanism of gene silencing in both plant and mammalian cells, has been proven an effective way to inhibit mammalian gene function [1], [2], [3], [4]. Small interfering RNA (siRNA), which is generally composed of 21–23 nucleotide (nt) double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) segments and is able to suppress gene expression for therapeutic purposes [5], has already been demonstrated as a potential therapeutic agent in vivo. Whereas, there are delivery limitations of naked siRNA in vivo, such as: (a) it tends to be degraded by Rnases; (b) naked siRNA can’t be transported through the cell membrane freely; and (c) targeting siRNA at a specific organ is problematic [6]. Therefore, there remains a significant challenge for the delivery of siRNA to realize its full therapeutic potential.

To help the active siRNA access the cytoplasm of the target cell, various delivery systems have been developed, which can typically be classified into two groups: viral and non-viral delivery systems. Viral vectors are highly efficient delivery systems for nucleic acids; however, the potential of host immune response and the high cost of production limit their applications [7]. Non-viral delivery systems include liposome systems [8], [9] and polymer systems. Synthetic cationic polymers have drawn much attention in the past decades because of low immunoreaction in vivo, controllable structure and easy production, such as branched or linear polyethylenimine (PEI) and its derivatives [10], [11], polyamidoamine (PAMAM) [12], [13], poly(l-lysine) (PLL) [14], poly(β-amino ester) (PAE) [15], [16] and poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) [17] etc.

The gene silencing efficiency of polymer vectors/siRNA complexes is lower than that of the viral vectors, but the flexibility in conformation design provides great promising potential in improving the siRNA delivery efficiency of polymer vectors to a level comparable to that of viral vectors. In this work, block and graft structural contributions of cationic segments on PEGylated PCL NPs for siRNA delivery were discussed, in order to provide some suggestions in the rational formulation design of polymer vectors.

Our previous research has showed that PEGylated PDMAEMA for DNA vaccine increased the immunogenicity of the intranasal administered DNA vaccine compared to the homopolymer PDMAEMA [18], due to the reduction in the cytotoxicity and prolongation in circulation time [19]. However, on the other hand, PEGylation also reduced gene transfection efficiency in vitro. In order to improve the gene transfection efficiency, we tried to introduce hydrophobic segments between PEG and PDMAEMA and prepared methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-polycaprolactone-block-poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (mPEG-PCL-b-PDMAEMA, PECbD) [20] and methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-(polycaprolactone-graft-poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)) (mPEG-PCL-g-PDMAEMA, PECgD) [21]. Fortunately, our research results indicated that the introduction of the hydrophobic chains can improve cellular uptake and the DNA transfection efficiency in vitro was largely increased [22]. However, the delivery efficiency of PECbD and PECgD in vivo had not been studied. Herein, we aimed to resolve (1) if PECbD and PECgD are also suitable for siRNA delivery, since the molecular topography, conformational flexibility and action mechanism of siRNA are completely different from DNA [23], (2) how PECbD and PECgD perform in vivo as siRNA vectors, and (3) the distinction between the structural contributions of the blocked and grafted PDMAEMA of PECbD and PECgD. It could be expected that different structures of cationic segments may have different performance in siRNA delivery and present different knockdown efficiencies.

Section snippets

Materials

γ-(2-Bromo-2-methylpropionate)-ε-caprolactone (BMPCL) was synthesized as reported previously [24], [25]. Methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG45, Mn = 2000), ε-caprolactone (CL), stannous octanoate (Sn(Oct)2), 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), copper(I) bromide (CuBr) and 2,2-bipyridine (bPy) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Lipofectamine 2000 and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Invitrogen

Results and discussion

Amphiphilic cationic polymers PECbD and PECgD, as potential carriers for gene and drug, have been studied in our previous work [20], [21]. Here, in order to study the contributions of PEDMAEMA chain length and the bound structure of block and graft to siRNA delivery, PECbD and PECgD polymers had almost the same length of mPEG and PCL chains but different lengths of PDMAEMA as shown in Table 1 were used. PECbD1 and PECbD2 had one longer PDMAEMA chain with degree of polymerization (DP) = 90 and

Conclusions

mPEG-b-PCL-b-PDMAEMA (PECbD) and mPEG-b-(PCL-g-PDMAEMA) (PECgD) nanoparticles (NPs) as siRNA carriers were studied in this paper in order to illustrate the structural contributions of blocked or grafted PDMAEMA on PEGylated polycaprolactone nanoparticles (NPs) in siRNA delivery. The results indicated that the structure of PECgD NPs with grafted short PEDMAEMA on the surface contributes better efficiency to siRNA delivery in vitro and in vivo. Due to the higher density of positive charge, PECgD

Acknowledgments

We thank Ning Hou (Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University) for technical supporting for cryosection preparation. This project was supported by a grant from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) (2009AA03Z313), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31100722, 30871385), the National Basic Research Program of China (2011CBA01102). Authors declare there are no conflicts of interest that relate to papers accepted for publication.

References (41)

  • H.K. de Wolf et al.

    Effect of cationic carriers on the pharmacokinetics and tumor localization of nucleic acids after intravenous administration

    Int J Pharm

    (2007)
  • H. Maeda et al.

    Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review

    J Control Release

    (2000)
  • K.V. Morris et al.

    Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells

    Science

    (2004)
  • G.J. Hannon

    RNA interference

    Nature

    (2002)
  • S.M. Hammond et al.

    An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells

    Nature

    (2000)
  • S.M. Elbashir et al.

    Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells

    Nature

    (2001)
  • D. Bumcrot et al.

    RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs

    Nat Chem Biol

    (2006)
  • M.D. Krebs et al.

    Localized and sustained delivery of silencing RNA from macroscopic biopolymer hydrogels

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2009)
  • W.J. Kim et al.

    Efficient siRNA delivery with non-viral polymeric vehicles

    Pharm Res

    (2009)
  • S. Spagnou et al.

    Lipidic carriers of siRNA: differences in the formulation, cellular uptake, and delivery with plasmid DNA

    Biochemistry-US

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Daoshu Lin and Yuanyu Huang equally contributed to this work.

    View full text