Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 275, 15 December 2014, Pages 234-242
Behavioural Brain Research

Review
High-anxiety rats are less sensitive to the rewarding affects of amphetamine on 50 kHz USV

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Amphetamine enhances appetitive 50 kHz vocalisation in rats.

  • Amphetamine's effect is stronger in low anxiety (LR) than in high anxiety rats (HR).

  • LR had increased basal levels of dopamine in the basolateral amygdala (BLA).

  • LR had increased dopamine metabolism in the BLA, in response to aversive context.

Abstract

This study assessed behaviour, as measured by 50 kHz calls related to positive affect, in rats with different fear conditioned response strengths: low-anxiety rats (LR) and high-anxiety rats (HR), after amphetamine injection in a two-injection protocol (TIPS). The results showed that the first dose of amphetamine evoked similar behavioural effects in frequency-modulated (FM) 50 kHz calls in the LR and HR groups. The second injection of amphetamine resulted in stronger FM 50 kHz calls in LR compared with HR rats. The biochemical data (‘ex vivo’ analysis) showed that the LR rats had increased basal levels of dopamine in the amygdala, and increased homovanilic acid (HVA), dopamine's main metabolite, in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex compared with HR rats. The ‘in vivo’ analysis (microdialysis study) showed that the LR rats had increased HVA concentrations in the basolateral amygdala in response to an aversively conditioned context. Research has suggested that differences in dopaminergic system activity in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex may be one of the biological factors that underlie individual differences in response to fear stimuli, which may also affect the rewarding effects of amphetamine.

Introduction

In rats, as in humans, there are a great deal of individual differences in the responses to stress and behavioural responses to the pharmacological activation of the mesolimbic system [1], [2], [3], [4]. Our previous studies on high-anxiety rats (HR) and low-anxiety rats (LR), which were selected based on their behaviour in the contextual fear test (i.e., the duration of the freezing response was used as the discriminating variable), showed that HR rats were characterised by an anxiogenic and depressive-like phenotype, using a passive coping strategy, showing decreased activity in the prefrontal cortex and increased activity in the basolateral amygdala (as shown in c-Fos studies) compared with the LR group. In contrast, LR rats were characterised by an active coping strategy, less anxiogenic and depressive-resilience behaviour, and increased activity of the prefrontal cortex and the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus [5], [6], [7].

It is well documented that dopaminergic transmission in the mesolimbic system is important for information processing, emotional responses to environmental changes, and strategies for coping with stress [8], [9], [10], [11]. Dopamine plays a critical role in the detection of novel information, which is essential for the consolidation, storage and retrieval of memories, all of which are likely to be impaired in depressed patients [11], [12]. Finally, it should be emphasised that dopamine is considered to be the main neurotransmitter involved in the mediation of different natural and drug-induced positive reinforcements [13], [14], [15], [16].

The frequency-modulated 50 kHz ultrasonic calls (FM 50 kHz, USV) offer a valuable index of the positive affective states evoked by naturally rewarding stimuli (e.g., food, social contacts) and induced by some psychostimulants (e.g., amphetamine) [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].

It is hypothesised that differences in dopaminergic activity may be one of the biological factors underlying individual differences in emotional responses and behavioural sensitisation to psychostimulants. We examined this interesting issue using behavioural responses measured by FM 50 kHz calls in rats with different fear-conditioned response strengths, either low-anxiety rats (LR) or high-anxiety (HR) rats, after amphetamine injection in a two-injection protocol (TIPS). In rats, repeated exposure to psychostimulant drugs results in a long-lasting enhancement of behavioural response, otherwise known as behavioural sensitisation [23], [24]. TIPS allows an easy distinction between the induction of sensitisation after the first injection and the drug's expression after a second injection, enabling the assessment of the long-lasting effects of a single exposure to drugs [25]. TIPS has been successfully used for the locomotor sensitisation of mice to morphine and cocaine [25]. It was previously shown that assessment of 50 kHz USV recording in TIPS model provides a good paradigm to observe sensitisation to amphetamine [26], [27]. In the literature, there is little information on the role of amygdala in the expression of 50 kHz calls. This fact is particularly interesting given that psychostimulants can produce both positive and aversive effects [28].

Electrophysiological studies have recently found that ultrasonic stimuli applied in two frequency ranges (22 kHz and 50 kHz) produced significant and opposite effects on single-unit responses to these stimuli in the lateral rat amygdala, indicating its contribution to the processing of both ethologically essential social signals [14]. For these reasons, we decided to analyse the role of the prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala. We also wanted to determine whether individual predisposition to a stronger fear response influences the development of sensitisation to psychoactive substances. An additional aim of this study was to test a new model of differential susceptibility to psychoactive drugs.

Section snippets

Animals

Male Wistar rats (n = 78, 200–220 g body weight, 8 weeks old at arrival) purchased from the stock of the Centre for Experimental Medicine, Medical University of Białystok, Poland, were housed under standard laboratory conditions with a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7 a.m.) at a constant temperature (21 ± 2 °C). They had ad libitum access to tap water and standard laboratory rodent chow. The experiments were performed in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of November 24,

USV data for TIPS evoked changes

The two-way repeated measures ANOVA did not reveal statistically significant differences in FM 50 kHz USV response during pre-amphetamine exposure to the testing box between the HR and LR groups. There was a significant exposure effect [F(1,48) = 5.97, (P < 0.05)], time effect [F(3,144) = 5.66, (P < 0.01)] and time × exposure effect [F(3,144) = 3.81, (P < 0.05)] but no group effect [F(1,48) = 1.46, (P = 0.23)], no group × exposure effect [F(1,40) = 0.89, (P = 0.35)], no time × group effect [F(3,144) = 1.63, (P = 0.18)], and

Discussion

Both groups of rats demonstrated faster behavioural responses, as measured by FM 50 kHz USV calls, after a second injection of amphetamine. However, in response to a second injection of amphetamine, the LR rats showed much more intense FM 50 kHz USV calls than did the HR rats, both 5 and 10 min after drug administration. The LR rats also had a higher baseline concentration of DA and HVA in the amygdala complex and HVA in the prefrontal cortex (‘ex vivo’ study) and a stronger fear-conditioned

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw, Poland and Grant No. UMO-2011/03/B/NZ4/02385 from the National Science Centre, Poland.

References (54)

  • B. Knutson et al.

    High-frequency ultrasonic vocalizations index conditioned pharmacological reward in rats

    Physiol Behav

    (1999)
  • J.R. Browning et al.

    Positive affective vocalizations during cocaine and sucrose self-administration: a model for spontaneous drug desire in rats

    Neuropharmacology

    (2011)
  • S.M. Brudzynski et al.

    Effects of intraaccumbens amphetamine on production of 50 kHz vocalizations in three lines of selectively bred Long-Evans rats

    Behav Brain Res

    (2011)
  • T.E. Robinson et al.

    The neural basis of drug craving: and incentive-sensitization theory of addiction

    Brain Res Brain Res Rev

    (1993)
  • E. Taracha et al.

    Diverging frequency-modulated 50-kHz vocalization, locomotor activity and conditioned place preference effects in rats given repeated amphetamine treatment

    Neuropharmacology

    (2014)
  • S.V. Mahler et al.

    A rodent “self-report” measure of methamphetamine craving? Rats ultrasonic vocalizations during methamphetamine self-administartion, extinction, and reinstatement

    Behav Brain Res

    (2013)
  • M. Lehner et al.

    Differences in the density of GABA-A receptor alpha-2 subunits and gephyrin in brain structures of rats selected for low and high anxiety in basal and fear-stimulated conditions, in a model of contextual fear conditioning

    Neurobiol Learn Mem

    (2010)
  • N. Kaneda et al.

    Simple method for simultaneous determination of acetylcholine, choline, noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin in brain tissue by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

    J Chromatogr

    (1986)
  • K.A. Stedenfeld et al.

    Novelty-seeking behavior predicts vulnerability in a rodent model of depression

    Physiol Behav

    (2011)
  • T. Suzuki et al.

    Enhancement of delayed release of dopamine in the amygdala induced by conditioned fear stress in methamphetamine-sensitized rats

    Eur J Pharmacol

    (2002)
  • T. Iwazaki et al.

    Protein expression profile in the amygdala of rats with methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization

    Neurosci Lett

    (2008)
  • J.P. Herman et al.

    Differential effects of inescapable footshocks and of stimuli previously paired with inescapable footshocks on dopamine turnover in cortical and limbic areas of the rat

    Life Sci

    (1982)
  • C. Büchel et al.

    Classical fear conditioning in functional neuroimaging

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2000)
  • A. Skórzewska et al.

    The effect of chronic administration of corticosterone on anxiety- and depression-like behavior and the expression of GABA-A receptor alpha-2 subunits in brain structures of low- and high-anxiety rats

    Horm Behav

    (2014)
  • P.V. Piazza et al.

    Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration

    Science

    (1989)
  • P.J. Pierre et al.

    Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (1997)
  • M. Kabbaj et al.

    Social defeat alters the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats: role of individual differences in cocaine-taking behavior

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2001)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Differences in the dopaminergic reward system in rats that passively and actively behave in the Porsolt test

      2019, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our previous study revealed that low anxiety rats (with a shorter freezing duration in the conditioned fear test) were characterized by more powerful amphetamine anticipation in amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference, compared to high anxiety rats (with a longer freezing duration in the conditioned fear test). This phenomenon was associated with increased dopamine and its metabolite levels in the prefrontal cortex, the nucleus accumbens and the central amygdala [2,21]. Furthermore, stress exposure may influence mesolimbic neurotransmission resulting in changes in response to psychoactive substances, an increased vulnerability to addiction and a stronger propensity to develop affective disorders [9,22,23].

    • The amphetamine-associated context exerts a stronger motivational effect in low-anxiety rats than in high-anxiety rats

      2017, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is also noteworthy that we used the most conservative Tukey’s test for the post hoc tests to avoid the risk of a type-one error. These data confirm our earlier findings that LR animals had a higher baseline dopaminergic activity than HR rats [9]. They also indicate a stronger reactivity of this monoaminergic system in the LR group in response to the context previously paired with amphetamine.

    • Individual differences in the behavioral effects of nicotine: A review of the preclinical animal literature

      2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Anxiety has been described in the clinical literature as an important trait in the development of drug use and abuse (e.g., Compton et al., 2007; Grant et al., 2004). However, only a handful of studies in the animal literature use anxiety-like behavior as a predictive screen for later drug effects (e.g., Dilleen et al., 2012; Lehner et al., 2014; Pelloux et al., 2009; Vautrin et al., 2005). The use of anxiety-like behavior as a predictive factor of subsequent behavioral effects of nicotine is promising.

    • Mesocorticolimbic dopamine functioning in primary psychopathy: A source of within-group heterogeneity

      2015, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In light of the data that is available, however, it can be deduced that the A1 genotype is associated with D2-receptor subsensitivity (both D2S and D2L), higher levels of DA turnover, and higher levels of tonic DA activity in striatal regions. It has been reported in rodents that D2S- and D2L-receptor subsensitivity, higher levels of DA synthesis, and higher extracellular DA are related to novelty-seeking, addictive behaviors, aggression, behavioral sensitization, incentive motivation, response perseveration, and lower levels of anxiety (Mällo et al., 2007; de Miguel et al., 2011; Beiderbeck et al., 2013; Tournier et al., 2013; Lehner et al., 2014; de Jong et al., in press; Holroyd et al., 2015), suggesting that the A1-allele of the TaqIA-ANKK1 SNP may relate to analogous traits in humans. In agreement, A1-allele carriers display higher levels of childhood antisocial behavior, bipolar disorder with low anxiety, impulsivity, novelty/stimulus seeking, aggression, antisocial/borderline traits, faster habituation to positive feedback (decoupling behavior from experience), and substance abuse/dependence but also adaptive traits such as extraversion, behavioral activation, low depression or harm avoidance, and improved cognitive performance (Noble et al., 1998; Bartrés-Faz et al., 2002; Eisenberg et al., 2007; Hoenicka et al., 2007; Ponce et al., 2008; Althaus et al., 2009; Esposito-Smythers et al., 2009; Ponce et al., 2009; Barskiĭ et al., 2010; Nemoda et al., 2010; Smillie et al., 2010; Stelzel et al., 2010; Thaler et al., 2012; Kazantseva et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2012; Zai et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013a, 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text