Elsevier

Autoimmunity Reviews

Volume 13, Issue 12, December 2014, Pages 1211-1219
Autoimmunity Reviews

Review
Four dermatomyositis-specific autoantibodies—anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE and anti-MDA5—in adult and juvenile patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in a Hungarian cohort

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2014.08.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Authors evaluated MSAs and their association with clinical symptoms.

  • 133 of 337 myositis patients had MSA; within 12 anti-TIF1γ, 4 anti-NXP2, 4 anti-SAE.

  • Clinical findings of patients with anti-TIF1γ, -NXP2, -SAE, and -MDA5 positivity

  • The relevant results were similar to those seen in previously published reports.

Abstract

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are chronic systemic autoimmune diseases characterised by symmetrical, proximal muscle weakness. Dermatomyositis represents one subset of IIMs, in which skin rashes are present in addition to muscle weakness. Myositis-specific antibodies can only be detected in myositis, and they are directed against specific proteins found in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus of cells. With this case-based article, we introduce the recently detected anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE and anti-MDA5 antibodies that form various clinical groups. These antibodies could be detected in patients with dermatomyositis. The myositis-specific autoantibodies of three hundred and thirty-seven Hungarian patients with IIM were detected. Retrospective analysis of the clinical findings has also been introduced by revision of the medical history. We had twelve patients with anti-TIF1γ positivity, four patients with anti-NXP2 positivity and four patients with anti-SAE positivity. We did not have any positive anti-MDA5 patients. The most relevant clinical findings were similar to those seen in previously published reports. Eleven of the twelve patients with anti-TIF1γ positivity had classical dermatomyositis. Three of the twelve anti-TIF1γ patients had cancer during the disease progression. This was two out of four for the anti-NXP2 subgroup and one in four for the anti-SAE subgroup. In two juvenile dermatomyositis cases, typical ulceration was seen in patients with anti-TIF1γ positivity. The frequency of pulmonary fibrosis during the disease progression was 2/12, 1/4 and 1/4 in anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2 and anti-SAE, respectively. Other extra-muscular manifestations, such as arthralgia, dysphagia, dysphonia and dyspnoea, were also detectable. The myositis subgroups determined by these myositis-specific autoantibodies differ from each other in their symptoms, prognosis and therapy responsiveness. Their detection is helpful for the preparation of an adequate treatment, but in daily diagnostic methods, these antibodies cannot be detected. By presenting our anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2 and anti-SAE cases, we would like to highlight the clinical role of these antibodies.

Introduction

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are systemic autoimmune diseases characterised by symmetrical, proximal muscle weakness. The most commonly used criteria for the classification of IIMs are those that were proposed by Bohan and Peter in 1975 [1]. From a clinico-pathological perspective, the IIMs fall into six categories: (1) dermatomyositis (DM; juvenile, adult), (2) polymyositis (PM; T-cell mediated, eosinophilic, granulomatous), (3) overlap syndromes (with DM, with PM, with sIBM/hIBM), (4) cancer-associated myositis, (5) inclusion body myositis (IBM), and (6) other forms (focal: orbital myositis, localised nodular myositis, inflammatory pseudotumor; diffuse: macrophagic myofasciitis, necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM), infantile myositis) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Although this clinico-pathological subdivision has a predictive value in prognosis and in therapy, according to our rising knowledge of the autoantibodies, this system seems to be worn out. Frequently, it generates heterogeneous disease groups; the definition of the criteria is indefinite. The degree of abnormality for the muscle enzymes, electromyography and histopathological alterations is not precise defined [17].

Autoantibodies are of great importance for the diagnosis of many systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including IIMs. Autoantibodies can be specific markers for myositis. They can be divided into two parts. The first is the group of myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs), for example anti-PM-Scl, anti-U1, U2-, U3-RNP, anti-Ku, anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La. These can be found in overlapping cases. Many studies highlight the importance of MAAs. It was reported that anti-U1-RNP was associated with active mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and with myositis and esophageal hypomotility [18]. We know that patients with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) are more frequently associated with anti-Ro/SSA antibody than PM/DM patients without ASS [19]. Our workgroup also reported previously that the co-existence of anti-SSA and anti-Jo-1 antibodies seems to be a predictor for relatively severe interstitial lung disease (ILD) in IIM patients [20]. In American patients anti-Ku antibody tends to be detected mainly in lupus patients [21], while in Europe it appears to be associated with overlap syndromes and certain clinical symptoms such as arthralgia and Raynaud's phenomenon [22], [23].

The other category is the group of the myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs). The MSAs are directed against specific proteins that can be found in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus of the cells. MSAs are useful in the diagnosis of IIMs and in the precise definition of disease subsets. Approximately 38% of IIM patients have MSAs in their sera [24], and, to our knowledge, the co-existence of two MSAs is considered extremely rare [25]. The presence of the MSA, in many cases, can be detected in the sera some months before clinical manifestation of the symptoms; the serum level may correlate with disease activity. If the MSA disappears, it could be the sign of remission, so they can serve as prognostic markers. With the help of the MSAs, we can make different disease phenotypes that could be important in diagnosis, therapy and prognosis [26]. The most relevant MSAs are the following. A meta-analysis from 2014 reviewed the clinical symptoms of patients with anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA-synthetase (anti-ARS) autoantibody. According to recent research anti-ARS autoantibodies include anti-Jo1, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-OJ, anti-EJ, anti-KS, anti-SC, anti-JS, anti-Ha and anti-Zo autoantibodies [27]. Autoantibodies found in patients with NAM are anti-SRP and the recently recognised anti-HMGCR and anti-200/100 [28], [29], [30]. The statin-induced form of NAM is associated with the presence of anti-HMGCR autoantibodies [31]. Anti-Mi-2 is a DM-associated MSA [32].

Novel MSAs targeting intracellular proteins have recently been detected in patients with DM, namely anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE and anti-MDA5.

According to previous reports, we can summarise that the frequency of anti-TIF1γ is 13–21% in adult and 23–29% in juvenile IIM cases [33]. The antigen is a 155 kDa antigen (the transcriptional intermediary factor 1 gamma—TIF1γ). Clinical representation of patients with anti-TIF1γ is DM together with malignancy in adult patients. In juvenile DM patients, antibodies for TIF-1γ are not associated with malignancy, but rather, with skin ulcerations and more extensive cutaneous diseases [33].

The frequency of this antibody in adult cases is less than 5% and in JDM within 23–25% [33]. Nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) was identified as the auto-antigen target [34]. Similar to anti-TIF1γ positivity, we can state that the adult and juvenile IIM cases also have different phenotypes when this antibody is present. The disease course is severe; in adult patients, DM and malignancy might be typical, whereas in juvenile cases, DM with specific skin symptoms such as calcinosis can appear [33].

The frequency of this antibody is less than 5% in adult and less than 1% in juvenile IIM cases [33]. The antigen is the small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE). It is associated with severe DM and, in adult patients, dysphagia can appear [33].

In a Japanese study, the frequency of this antibody was 11% in DM patients, whereas, in a retrospective study from the USA, it was 13% [35], [36]. The antigen is the melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5). Patients from the USA with anti-MDA5 positivity are reported to have mild muscle symptoms and DM is associated with ulcers; they often have arthritis and ILD. Patients from the East Asian population are reported to have clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM), rapidly progressive ILD and poor prognosis [33].

In this study, after giving an overview of the MAAs and MSAs, we highlight the importance of our clinical findings in positive anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE and anti-MDA5 adult and juvenile patients with IIM in a Hungarian cohort. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of these MSAs in IIM and their association with clinical characteristics and the disease course.

Section snippets

Patients

The Department of Clinical Immunology in the Medical and Health Science Centre at the University of Debrecen (Hungary) oversees five hundred and forty patients with IIM. The Myositis Antibody Research Project is coordinated together with the Bath Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (UK). The serology of three hundred and thirty-seven patients with PM/DM was collected. Bohan and Peter criteria were used for the diagnosis of PM/DM. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 contain the

Results and discussion

All three hundred and thirty-seven patients were Caucasian. The mean age of the patients was 54.83 years (the oldest patient was 90 and the youngest patient was 9 years old); the women/men ratio was 2.92:1. According to the classical clinico-pathological subgroups, there were two hundred and eleven PM patients (62.61%), seventy-three DM patients (21.66%), seventeen children with JDM (5.04%), eight patients that had myositis associated with cancer (2.37%), twenty-four cases in which we could

Conclusion

The aim of this article was to summarise the newest knowledge about the anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE and anti-MDA5 MSAs. Our study detected twenty patients with these dermatomyositis-specific MSAs: twelve patients with anti-TIF1γ, four patients with anti-NXP2 and four patients with anti-SAE positivity. We have given an overview of the myositis-subgroups based on recently detected MSAs. The data of our IIM patients helped us to make a comparison with results in previously published reports.

Take-home messages

  • Novel myositis-specific autoantibodies targeting intracellular proteins have recently been detected in patients with dermatomyositis.

  • It is an up-to-date review of immunoserological classification based on novel antibodies.

  • Our data of autoantibody-frequencies reflect that anti-TIF1γ, anti-NXP2 and anti-SAE are less frequent in the studied Hungarian population than in other investigations. The lack of anti-MDA5 positivity is remarkable.

  • The relevant clinical findings were similar to those seen in

Acknowledgements

This study was organised within the ESF EuMyoNet Research Networking Programme.

The article was supported by the UD Faculty of Medicine Research Foundation (Bridging Fund 2012, No. 1G3D1YCSDK12 246).

References (66)

  • A. Rojana-udomsart et al.

    Complement-mediated muscle cell lysis: a possible mechanism of myonecrosis in anti-SRP associated necrotizing myopathy (ASANM)

    J Neuroimmunol

    (Nov 15 2013)
  • P.D. Hamann et al.

    Statin-induced necrotizing myositis—a discrete autoimmune entity within the “statin-induced myopathy spectrum”

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Okt 2013)
  • D. Fiorentino et al.

    The mucocutaneous and systemic phenotype of dermatomyositis patients with antibodies to MDA5 (CADM-140): a retrospective study

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2011)
  • M. Mahler et al.

    Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and the anti-synthetase syndrome: a comprehensive review

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Apr–May 2014)
  • B. Hervier et al.

    Hierarchical cluster and survival analyses of antisynthetase-syndrome: phenotype and outcome are correlated with anti-tRNA synthetase antibody specificity

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Dec 2012)
  • I. Marie et al.

    Comparison of long-term outcome between anti-Jo1- and anti-PL7/PL12 positive patients with antisynthetase syndrome

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Aug 2012)
  • F. Ingegnoli et al.

    Interstitial lung disease outcomes by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in anti-Jo1 antibody-positive polymyositis patients: a single center study and review of the literature

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Mar 2012)
  • I. Marie et al.

    Hematological malignancy associated with polymyositis and dermatomyositis

    Autoimmun Rev

    (Jul 2012)
  • E. Tarricone et al.

    Anti-SAE antibodies in autoimmune myositis: identification by unlabelled protein immunoprecipitation in an Italian patient cohort

    J Immunol Methods

    (2012)
  • A. Bohan et al.

    Polymyositis and dermatomyositis

    N Engl J Med

    (1975)
  • C. Sun et al.

    Juvenile dermatomyositis: a 20-year retrospective analysis of treatment and clinical outcomes

    Pediatr Neonatol

    (Jun 27 2014)
  • Y.B. Luo et al.

    Dermatomyositis, polymyositis and immune-mediated necrotising myopathies

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (Jun 5 2014)
  • R. Neri et al.

    Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: analysis of a monocentric cohort

    J Clin Neuromuscul Dis

    (Jun 2014)
  • K. Dankó et al.

    Paraneoplastic myopathy

    Curr Opin Rheumatol

    (Nov 2009)
  • J. Yan et al.

    Idiopathic orbital myositis

    J Craniofac Surg

    (May 2014)
  • D. Matsuse et al.

    Case of eosinophilic myositis in continuum from localized nodular myositis

    Rinsho Shinkeigaku

    (Jan 2008)
  • S.A. Michaelides et al.

    Cavitating lung lesion as a manifestation of inflammatory tumor (pseudotumor) of the lung: a case report and literature review

    Am J Case Rep

    (Jun 17 2014)
  • R. La Corte et al.

    In patients with antisynthetase syndrome the occurrence of anti-Ro/SSA antibodies causes a more severe interstitial lung disease

    Autoimmunity

    (May 2006)
  • A. Váncsa et al.

    Characteristics of interstitial lung disease in SS-A positive/Jo-1 positive inflammatory myopathy patients

    Rheumatol Int

    (Jul 2009)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Increased prevalence of autoantibodies to Ku antigen in African American versus white patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Arthritis Rheum

    (Oct 2001)
  • H.M. Cooley et al.

    Clinical and serological associations of anti-Ku antibody

    J Rheumatol

    (Mar 1999)
  • F. Franceschini et al.

    Anti-Ku antibodies in connective tissue diseases: clinical and serological evaluation of 14 patients

    J Rheumatol

    (Jul 2002)
  • R. Brouwer et al.

    Autoantibody profiles in the sera of European patients with myositis

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (Feb 2001)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Cancer associated autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A retrospective cohort from a single center in China

      2023, Medicina Clinica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Considering that anti-TIF1-antibody-positive associated malignancy occurred exclusively within 3 years either side of the dermatomyositis onset, and no incident cancer cases were detected in this group beyond this period,31 yearly cancer screening (conventional or with PET/CT) is recommended in anti-TIF1-γ-positive patients for at least 3–5 years after diagnosis. Autoantibodies against the SAE (small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme) were first reported in 2007 by Betteridge et al.36 Since the first report of anti SAE antibodies in DM cases, the prevalence of anti-SAE antibody was described by several different cohorts, ranging from 1% to 8%.37–40 This was consistent with the frequency of anti-SAE antibodies (2.6%) in our cohort.

    • In vitro diagnostics for the medical dermatologist. Part I: Autoimmune tests

      2021, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Commercially available dermatomyositis test panels use immunologic methods of immunoprecipitation and ELISA to detect individual MSAs. MSAs associated with dermatomyositis that are typically included on commercial panels are described in Table IV42-66; however, as research is ongoing for these phenotypes, they are not labeled by sensitivity or specificity. The role of MSA testing in diagnosis and management of dermatomyositis continues to be debated, given recent advancement and availability of testing.67,68

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text