Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 62, December 2012, Pages 74-81
Atmospheric Environment

Spatially-differentiated atmospheric source–receptor relationships for nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and ammonia emissions at the global scale for life cycle impact assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.069Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper aims to advance regional worldwide source–receptor relationships, providing fate factors for acidifying and eutrophying air emissions (NOx, HNO3, SO2, SO4 and NH3) to be used within life cycle impact assessment. A simulation for the reference year 2005 of the three-dimensional global scale tropospheric GEOS-Chem model was used as the basis of a novel methodological approach to derive source–receptor matrices (SRMs) whose elements are fate factors at a global 2° × 2.5° grid. This new approach makes it possible to assess the impact of transboundary emissions while maintaining regional scale emission differentiation. These 2° × 2.5° grid resolution fate factors were later aggregated at continental and country resolutions using emission weighting. Continental fate factor results showed that 50–70% of nitrogen oxides (NOx, HNO3) and sulfur oxides (SO2, SO4) and approximately 80% of ammonia (NH3) emissions will deposit on the same continent. Results showed that the developed fate factor derivation approach was within a ±10% agreement with GEOS-Chem simulations in which fate factors were determined by withdrawing the regional emission inventory over Canada and in ±50% agreement with current state-of-the-art LCIA fate factors (calculated with the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) model). The SRMs outlined in this paper facilitate further modeling developments without having to run the underlying tropospheric model, thus opening the door to the assessment of the regional life cycle inventories of a global economy.

Highlights

► We provide an approach to estimate regional fate factors at a global scale. ► Transboundary impacts can now be evaluated in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). ► We favorably compared the approach results with direct GEOS-Chem outputs. ► The uncertainties and limitations of the approach are acceptable for LCIA purposes.

Introduction

Life cycle assessment (LCA) aims to compile and evaluate the inputs, outputs and potential environmental impacts of a product or service throughout its entire life cycle, from material extraction to end-of-life (Udo de Haes et al., 2002). Inputs and outputs are compiled in the life cycle inventory (LCI) phase and then classified into different impact categories. Among the considered life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) impact categories are acidification and eutrophication, which are related to the atmospheric deposition of inorganic substances such as sulfates and nitrates (Environment Canada, 2004; European Environment Agency, 2005). Evaluating potential impacts requires characterization factors (CF) [Impact*kg emitted−1] that link life cycle inventory results to an impact score that is specific to a given impact category (Udo de Haes et al., 2002). Following the general framework of emission-related impact categories (Udo de Haes et al., 2002), the CF is calculated as the product of an atmospheric fate factor, an exposure factor (or, alternatively, an ecosystem sensitivity factor) and an effect factor, which are each calculated with one or several environmental models describing the biophysical relationships along the cause-effect chains from an emission to a given impact indicator. This paper specifically focuses on the development of atmospheric fate factors.

Atmospheric fate factors [kgdeposited*kgemitted−1] represent the climatic conditions (e.g. dispersion, atmospheric transport, etc.) and deposition mechanisms between the source and receptor locations (i.e. the source–receptor relationship) in a single fraction. Since there are many receptor elements and/or many sources, source–receptor relationships are written as a source–receptor matrix (SRM) whose elements are fate factors; each line is a source location and each column a receptor location. The main advantage of SRMs is simplicity. For a given source vector, the resulting receptor values can be obtained by a simple matrix-vector multiplication, avoiding the evaluation of the entire numerical model of the transport and dispersion processes (Seibert and Frank, 2003).

SRMs are used in LCIA to support CF development for acidifying and eutrophying chemicals (Bare et al., 2002; Fréchette-Marleau et al., 2008; Huijbregts et al., 2000; Potting et al., 1998; Seppälä et al., 2006; van Zelm et al., 2007). In such cases, SRM derivation relies on a number of regional atmospheric models referring to a specific geographic context—North America or Europe—typically covering the spatial range of the continental scale and with the typical spatial resolutions of countries or regions within countries (scale 50–500 km) (Potting and Hauschild, 2006). Restricted spatial ranges make it possible to include more sophisticated location-specific approaches and thus yield more reliable fate factors (Bare et al., 2002). On the other hand, emissions traveling outside the model's region of interest are not taken into account. Impact assessment is therefore incomplete, consequently diminishing the relevance of the LCA (Hayashi et al., 2004; van Zelm et al., 2007). Furthermore, the models do not facilitate a coherent assessment of life cycle emission inventories occurring outside their geographical context, as is often the case in a global economy (e.g. a North American emission is considered and modeled as a European emission).

Outside LCA, transboundary emissions were analyzed with global models: the spatial resolution was coarser and there was no differentiation between countries or regions. For example, Sanderson et al. (2008) provided continental SRMs for Europe, North America, South Asia and East Asia; Liu et al. (2008) studied source–receptor relationships between East Asian sulfur dioxide emissions and northern hemisphere sulfate concentrations and Kajino et al. (2010) showed that the intercontinental transport of sulfate aerosols could potentially influence regional air quality. Though it has never been explicitly stated, the reason for lowering the spatial resolution is applicability. SRM determination is costly in terms of computing, since simulations must be rerun for each source location or a separate species must be tracked for each source element (Seibert and Frank, 2003).

This paper aims to derive worldwide SRMs for sulfur oxides (SO2, SO4), nitrogen oxides (NOx (i.e., NO, NO2, NO3, HNO2), HNO3) and ammonia (NH3) airborne emissions to support LCIA model development at a global scale, while ensuring a relatively high resolution for regional differentiation. More specifically, the objective of this project is to derive SRMs on a 2° latitude × 2.5° longitude grid resolution by using the GEOS-Chem global atmospheric model as a starting point and aggregating SRMs at a coarser resolution (i.e. country and then continental levels).

Section snippets

Description of GEOS-Chem simulation

GEOS-Chem is a global 3D model of tropospheric chemistry driven by assimilated meteorological observations from the Goddard Earth Observing System of the NASA Data Assimilation Office (Bey et al., 2001). It simultaneously considers all emissions, transport, chemical transformations and deposition processes on a global level. GEOS-Chem is provided with all relevant input data.

A number of emission options were selected for the GEOS-Chem simulation. By activating the anthropogenic emission option,

Results

The GEOS-Chem-based SRMs describe the source–receptor relationships of different acidifying chemical species at 2° × 2.5°, country and continental level resolutions. Resulting SRMs are available in Supplementary data or on demand.

Original SRMs (Eq. (6)) captured 87.2, 93.5 and 89.9% of nitrogen oxides (NOx, HNO3), sulfur oxides (SO2, SO4), and ammonia (NH3) total global deposition, respectively. The refined SRMs from Eq. (8) increased these percentages to 97.5, 98.7 and 95.5%. The missing

Discussion

In this paper, we were able to derive global SRMs related to the atmospheric emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx, HNO3), sulfur oxides (SO2, SO4) and ammonia (NH3) to support CF development for LCIA acidification and eutrophication impact categories. In impact modeling, LCIA aims for the best estimates (Finnveden et al., 2009) and should not be considered as a substitute for (environmental) risk assessment. In LCIA, a coarse/broad estimation with associated uncertainty is often preferred over no

Conclusion

This study provides SRMs with fate factors for the atmospheric emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx, HNO3), sulfur oxides (SO2, SO4), and ammonia (NH3) to support the development of spatially-differentiated characterization factors at the global level for the acidification and eutrophication impact categories. These fate factors were derived at a relatively high spatial resolution and account for transboundary emissions outside the standard continental boundaries considered in current LCIA models.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Gabriel Morin, Claude Belley, Bob Yantosca and Mourad Heniche for their expertise and especially their patience. The CIRAIG would also like to thank its industrial partners for their financial support: ArcelorMittal, Bell Canada, Cascades, Eco Entreprises Québec, RECYC-QUÉBEC, Groupe EDF, Gaz de France, Hydro-Québec, Johnson & Johnson, Mouvement des caisses Desjardins, Rio Tinto Alcan, RONA, SAQ, Total and Veolia Environment. The research was partly funded by the European

References (29)

  • G. Finnveden et al.

    Recent development in Life Cycle Assessment

    Journal of Environmental Management

    (2009)
  • R. Singles et al.

    A multi-layer model to describe the atmospheric transport and deposition of ammonia in Great Britain – do we have enough answers?

    Atmospheric Environment

    (1998)
  • J.C. Bare et al.

    TRACI: the tool for the reduction and assessment of other environmental impacts

    Journal of Industrial Ecology

    (2002)
  • Barret, K., Berge, E., 1996. Transboundary air pollution in Europe: estimated dispersion of acidifying agents and of...
  • Benedictow, A., Fagerli, H., Gauss, M., Jonson, J.E., Nyìri, A., Simpson, D., Tsyro, S., Valdebenito, A.,...
  • I. Bey et al.

    Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation

    Journal of Geophysical Research

    (2001)
  • F. Dentener

    IPCC Results: Comparison with Measurements

    (2007)
  • Environment Canada, 2004. 2004 Canadian acid deposition: science assessment, summary of key results. In: Environment...
  • European Environment Agency, 2005. Source apportionment of nitrogen and phosphorus inputs into the aquatic environment....
  • Evans, M., Jingqiu, M. (Eds.), 2009. Updated Chemical Reactions Now Used in GEOS-Chem v8-02-01 Through GEOS-Chem...
  • S. Fréchette-Marleau et al.

    Evaluating the variability of aquatic acidification and photochemical ozone formation characterization factors for Canadian emissions

    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

    (2008)
  • K. Hayashi et al.

    Development of damage function of acidification for terrestrial ecosystems based on the aluminum toxicity on net primary production

    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

    (2004)
  • M. Huijbregts et al.

    Spatially explicit characterization of acidifying and eutrophying air pollution in life-cycle assessment

    Journal of Industrial Ecology

    (2000)
  • D. Jacob et al.

    Harvard Wet Deposition Scheme for GMI

    (2000)
  • Cited by (42)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text