Elsevier

Appetite

Volume 105, 1 October 2016, Pages 14-26
Appetite

Dietary interventions among university students: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to provide an overview of available literature on interventions aiming to improve dietary intake among university students.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus were searched for relevant articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research.

Results

Twenty studies were identified, consisting of 12 randomised controlled trials, 1 quasi-experiment and 7 pre-experiments. Six studies were conducted outside the US. Risk of bias assessment revealed an average quality score of 5.8/10. Of the 13 interventions which were effective in improving students’ dietary intake, 8 used an intrapersonal approach, with 6 of them using the web or some kind of media to facilitate the intervention. The 5 remaining studies used an environmental (point-of-purchase) approach. Only 1 intervention, using 10 web-based lessons, based on non-diet principles and focused on eating competence and size acceptance to promote healthy eating, was found to be effective in the long term.

Conclusions

Nutrition education, enhancing self-regulation components towards dietary intake (often facilitated by the worldwide web or other media devices), and point-of-purchase messaging strategies may improve university or college students’ dietary intake. Future high quality randomised controlled trials should evaluate sustainability of intervention effects, as well as further investigate the effectiveness of realistic and low-cost environmental (preferably combined with intrapersonal) interventions which can easily and instantly reach a great part of the university population.

Introduction

The transition from high school to college or university has been shown to be a critical period for weight and fat gain (Deliens et al., 2013, Fedewa et al., 2014, Finlayson et al., 2012). Many university students do not meet the recommended dietary guidelines, which may result in inappropriate weight gain (Crombie et al., 2009, Fedewa et al., 2014, Vella-Zarb and Elgar, 2009). Weight gain and altered dietary patterns during college or university may have unfavourable physiological consequences that could lead to diet-related chronic diseases in later life, such as overweight and obesity, cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes (Roger et al., 2012), and subsequently, increased health care costs (Finkelstein, Trogdon, Cohen, & Dietz, 2009).

It has been recommended that health experts and universities make students aware of the importance of a healthy dietary pattern and to promote healthy eating habits on university campuses (Crombie et al., 2009). To do so, it is important to get an overview of effective strategies promoting healthy dietary intake in university settings. Kelly and colleagues (Kelly, Mazzeo, & Bean, 2013) conducted a systematic review of intervention studies (published between 2001 and 2011) aiming to improve university students’ dietary intake. Although long-term efficacy was rarely studied, it was concluded that particularly interventions using self-regulation strategies along with a face-to-face or online approach were effective. In this review, studies recruiting students from specific courses (e.g. nutrition or health class, human biology course) were not excluded. It is likely, however, that students enrolled in such classes are intrinsically interested in dietary intake and nutrition in general. To minimize selection bias, which often results in low external validity, systematic reviews should only include interventions focusing on students from a variety of courses and study disciplines. Furthermore, Kelly’s review (Kelly et al., 2013) excluded studies conducted outside the United States (US). Because of socio-cultural and socio-economic differences between the US and Europe or other parts of the world (fast food and all-you-can-eat dining culture), we cannot generalize these results to other non-US student populations. Given the fact that the past few years research on university students’ dietary intake has gained interest outside the US, a more complete and more global overview of literature on dietary interventions aiming to improve dietary intake among university students is needed. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to provide a more recent overview of available literature (including US and non-US studies) on interventions aiming to improve dietary intake among university students from a variety of courses and study disciplines.

Section snippets

Databases and key words

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in December 2014, following the PRISMA guidelines (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009). Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus were searched for relevant studies. The PICO method (da Costa Santos, de Mattos Pimenta, & Nobre, 2007) was used to conduct the search, including following key words: “student”, “freshman”, “young adults”, “college”, “university”, “higher education”, “campus”, “dining hall”, “intervention”,

Results

In total, 1439 potentially relevant publications were retrieved from the four databases. Five hundred thirty duplicates were excluded resulting in 909 records to be screened. Based on title and abstract, 860 publications were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. After assessing the 49 remaining full-text articles for eligibility, 14 publications were included in the qualitative synthesis. Forward and backward searching as well as screening of Kelly’s review (Kelly et al.,

Discussion

The purpose of this systematic review was to provide a recent and comprehensive overview of worldwide studies aiming to improve dietary intake among university students. In total, twenty studies were identified, consisting of 12 RCTs, 1 quasi-experiment and 7 pre-experiments. In comparison to the review by Kelly and colleagues (Kelly et al., 2013), we added 12 more studies, of which 6 were conducted outside the US.

Conclusions

This systematic review showed that nutrition education, enhancing self-regulation components towards dietary intake (often facilitated by the worldwide web or other media devices), and POP messaging strategies may improve university or college students’ dietary intake. However, only one intervention was found to be effective in the long term. This intervention used ten web-based lessons, based on non-diet principles and focused on eating competence and size acceptance to promote healthy eating.

References (46)

  • O. Matvienko et al.

    A college nutrition science course as an intervention to prevent weight gain in female college freshmen

    Journal of Nutration and Education

    (2001)
  • M.C. Nelson et al.

    Understanding the perceived determinants of weight-related behaviors in late Adolescence: a qualitative analysis among college youth

    Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

    (2009)
  • T.L. Psota et al.

    Associations between eating competence and cardiovascular disease biomarkers

    Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

    (2007)
  • A. Richards et al.

    Motivating 18- to 24-year-olds to increase their fruit and vegetable consumption

    Journal of the American Dietetic Association

    (2006)
  • E. Satter

    Eating competence: definition and evidence for the Satter Eating Competence model

    Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

    (2007)
  • W.E. Waterlander et al.

    Price discounts significantly enhance fruit and vegetable purchases when combined with nutrition education: a randomized controlled supermarket trial

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2013)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Using a combined motivational and volitional intervention to promote exercise and healthy dietary behaviour among undergraduates

    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

    (2012)
  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

    Evidence analysis Manual: Steps in the Academy evidence analysis process

    (2012)
  • D.S. Bond et al.

    B-MOBILE–a smartphone-based intervention to reduce sedentary time in overweight/obese individuals: a within-subjects experimental trial

    Plos One

    (2014)
  • D.M. Brown et al.

    Healthy active living: a residence community-based intervention to increase physical activity and healthy eating during the transition to first-year university

    Journal of American college health : J of ACH

    (2014)
  • O.N. Brown et al.

    Mobile MyPlate: a pilot study using text messaging to provide nutrition education and promote better dietary choices in college students

    Journal of American College Health

    (2014)
  • M.K. Cardenas et al.

    The effect of changes in visibility and price on fruit purchasing at a university cafeteria in Lima, Peru

    Public Health Nutration

    (2014)
  • J. Chapman et al.

    Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables

    Psychology& Health

    (2009)
  • Cited by (71)

    • An evaluation of the healthier dining programme effects on university student and staff choices in Singapore: A cluster-randomized trial

      2022, Food Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The food environment at institutes of higher education (IHEs), such as universities, is an important setting for promoting healthy dietary behaviors. Attending university often marks the beginning of independence for young adults learning to adapt to an out-of-home environment (Deliens et al., 2016; Glanz et al., 2005; Story et al., 2008). Making healthy dietary choices can be challenging for students who often prioritize taste, price, and appeal of foods over healthfulness (Hoefkens et al., 2011; Roininen et al., 1999; Verbeke, 2006).

    • Multidimensional eating profiles associated with personality traits during emerging adulthood: A cluster-analytic approach

      2022, Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee
      Citation Excerpt :

      Efforts to control weight are common among young adults, with overweight and obesity prevalence around, respectively, 13% and 5.5% among young adults in France (Obépi, 2012). Therefore, prevention programs countering unhealthy eating habits in young adults are needed, especially as these behaviors may remain throughout adulthood (Deliens et al., 2016). Thus, understanding the factors involved in unhealthy eating behaviors such as overeating or high intake of “junk foods” is crucial in promoting healthy behaviors.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text