Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volumes 464–465, 15 August 2013, Pages 128-135
Applied Catalysis A: General

An open metal site metal–organic framework Cu(BDC) as a promising heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.034Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cu(BDC) was used as catalyst for the modified Friedländer.

  • High conversions were achieved using catalytic amounts of the Cu(BDC).

  • The catalyst could be recovered and reused.

Abstract

A crystalline porous metal–organic framework Cu(BDC) was synthesized, and characterized by several techniques, including X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS), hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), and nitrogen physisorption measurements. The Cu(BDC) exhibited high catalytic activity for the modified Friedländer transformation using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as the starting material, thus offering advantages over the conventional Friedländer reaction in terms of avoiding the problems associated with the storage of the highly unstable 2-aminobenzaldehyde. Moreover, the Cu(BDC) could offer significantly higher catalytic activity than that of other Cu-MOFs such as Cu3(BTC)2, Cu(BPDC), and Cu2(BDC)2(DABCO). The catalyst could be recovered and reused several times without a significant degradation in catalytic activity. The modified Friedländer reaction could only occur in the presence of the solid Cu(BDC) with no contribution from leached active species.

Introduction

Quinoline derivatives have attracted significant attention as a major class of heterocycles possessing a wide variety of pharmacological and biological activities [1], [2], [3], [4]. Conventionally, these structures are synthesized by the Friedländer condensation between a 2-aminoaryl carbonyl and an another carbonyl compound containing a reactive α-methylene group followed by cyclodehydration [1], [5], [6], [7]. Although several homogeneous [8], [9], [10], [11] or heterogeneous [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] Lewis acid catalysts have been employed for the reaction, the protocol would suffer a number of serious drawbacks, especially problems related to the storage of the highly unstable 2-aminobenzaldehyde [17] as well as the formation of undesired products as a result of the self-aldol condensation of the 2-aminoaryl carbonyls [18]. Several efforts have been made to achieve a more efficient approach for the formation of quinoline derivatives, in which the modified Friedländer reaction using 2-aminobenzyl alcohols instead of 2-aminoaryl carbonyls have emerged as a promising alternative, offering several advantages as compared to the conventional Friedländer condensation [19], [20], [21]. A number of catalysts were previously employed for the modified Friedländer reaction, including CuCl2 [19], [22], [IrCl(cod)]2 and triphenylphosphine [23], Pd(OAc)2 [24], Ag–Pd alloy nanoparticles supported on carbon [21], o-benzenedisulfonimide [1], and ruthenium-grafted hydrotalcite [25]. Moreover, base-mediated modified Friedländer transformations using more than one equivalents of a strong base were also investigated [2]. Unfortunately, difficulties in the cost of catalysts, drastic reaction conditions, low yields, and tedious workup procedures have restricted the application of these methods. For the development of more environmentally benign processes, a greener catalyst that could offer the ease of handling, simple workup, recyclability and reusability should be targeted for the reaction.

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid crystalline porous materials assembled with metal ions and organic linkers, emerging as promising materials with potential applications in several fields [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Although the application of MOFs in catalysis is a young research area, MOFs have been employed as solid catalysts or catalyst supports for a variety of organic transformations [32], [33], including the three-component (aldehyde–alkyne–amine) coupling reaction [34], the Biginelli reaction [35], asymmetric α-alkylation of aldehydes [36], NO generation from biologically occurring substrates [37], the conventional Friedländer condensation [38], [39], [40], the arylation of aldehydes with arylboronic acids [41], the Paal–Knorr reaction [42], Friedel–Crafts reactions between pyrroles and nitroalkenes [43], Friedel–Crafts alkylation and acylation [44], [45], [46], oxidation [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], alkene epoxidation [55], [56], [57], cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides [58], cyanosilylation [59], [60], hydrogenation [61], Suzuki cross-coupling [62], [63], Sonogashira reaction [64], transesterification reaction [65], Knoevenagel condensation [66], [67], [68], aldol condensation [69], [70], aza-Michael condensation [71], [72], 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions [73], N-methylation of aromatic primary amines [74], epoxide ring-opening reaction [75], [76], [77], hydrolysis of ammonia borane [78], and cyclopropanation of alkene [79]. However, it is apparent that the application of MOFs in the field of catalysis is still an immature phase and will attract further research in the near future [80]. In this work, we wish to report the use of Cu(BDC) as an efficiently heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer transformation using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as the starting material. The Cu(BDC)-catalyzed protocol offers several advantages as compared to the conventional approach in the formation of quinoline derivatives.

Section snippets

Materials and instrumentation

All reagents and starting materials were obtained commercially from Sigma–Aldrich and Merck, and were used as received without any further purification unless otherwise noted. Nitrogen physisorption measurements were conducted using a Micromeritics 2020 volumetric adsorption analyzer system. Samples were pretreated by heating under vacuum at 150 °C for 3 h. A Netzsch Thermoanalyzer STA 409 was used for thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere.

Catalyst synthesis and characterization

In this work, the Cu(BDC) was synthesized in a yield of 77% by a solvothermal method, according to a slightly modified literature procedure [81]. The Cu-MOF was then characterized by a variety of different techniques. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the Cu(BDC) (Fig. S1) showed the presence of very sharp peaks, which matched well with those previously reported in the literature [81]. Elemental analysis by AAS indicated a copper loading of 3.95 mmol/g. The SEM micrograph of the Cu(BDC) revealed

Conclusions

In summary, highly crystalline porous metal–organic framework Cu(BDC) was synthesized from the reaction of copper nitrate trihydrate and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid by a solvothermal method, and was characterized by a variety of different techniques, including XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR, TGA, AAS, H2-TPR and nitrogen physisorption measurements. The Cu(BDC) could be used as an efficiently heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer transformation using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as the starting

Acknowledgement

The Vietnam National University – Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) is acknowledged for financial support through Project No. B2013-20-05.

References (93)

  • M. Barbero et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2010)
  • H.V. Mierde et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2008)
  • F. O’Donnell et al.

    Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents

    (2010)
  • B. Das et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2007)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2012)
  • A. Shaabani et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2008)
  • H.V. Mierde et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2009)
  • C.S. Cho et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2009)
  • C.S. Cho et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2006)
  • K. Taguchi et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2005)
  • C.S. Cho et al.

    J. Organomet. Chem.

    (2007)
  • K. Motokura et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2004)
  • R.J. Kuppler et al.

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2009)
  • J. Yang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2012)
  • P. Li et al.

    Tetrahedron Lett.

    (2011)
  • M. Položij et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2013)
  • N.T.S. Phan et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2012)
  • N.T.S. Phan et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2012)
  • N.T.S. Phan et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2010)
  • U. Ravon et al.

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2010)
  • L.T.L. Nguyen et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2011)
  • W. Kleist et al.

    Thermochim. Acta

    (2010)
  • A. Dhakshinamoorthy et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2011)
  • K. Schlichte et al.

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2004)
  • S. Opelt et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2008)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2011)
  • S. Gao et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2010)
  • S. Neogi et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2009)
  • J. Gascon et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • G.A.E. Oxford et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2011)
  • L.T.L. Nguyen et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2012)
  • I. Luz et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2010)
  • A. Dhakshinamoorthy et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2010)
  • P. Song et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2011)
  • F.-N. Shi et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2011)
  • N.T.S. Phan et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2006)
  • I. Luz et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2012)
  • D. Jiang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2011)
  • J.H. Kwak et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2012)
  • K.L. Deutsch et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2012)
  • M.L. Smith et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2012)
  • A. Busetti et al.

    Green Chem.

    (2010)
  • P.G. Dormer et al.

    J. Org. Chem.

    (2003)
  • B.R. McNaughton et al.

    Org. Lett.

    (2003)
  • A. Arcadi et al.

    Synlett

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text