An open metal site metal–organic framework Cu(BDC) as a promising heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer reaction
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Quinoline derivatives have attracted significant attention as a major class of heterocycles possessing a wide variety of pharmacological and biological activities [1], [2], [3], [4]. Conventionally, these structures are synthesized by the Friedländer condensation between a 2-aminoaryl carbonyl and an another carbonyl compound containing a reactive α-methylene group followed by cyclodehydration [1], [5], [6], [7]. Although several homogeneous [8], [9], [10], [11] or heterogeneous [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] Lewis acid catalysts have been employed for the reaction, the protocol would suffer a number of serious drawbacks, especially problems related to the storage of the highly unstable 2-aminobenzaldehyde [17] as well as the formation of undesired products as a result of the self-aldol condensation of the 2-aminoaryl carbonyls [18]. Several efforts have been made to achieve a more efficient approach for the formation of quinoline derivatives, in which the modified Friedländer reaction using 2-aminobenzyl alcohols instead of 2-aminoaryl carbonyls have emerged as a promising alternative, offering several advantages as compared to the conventional Friedländer condensation [19], [20], [21]. A number of catalysts were previously employed for the modified Friedländer reaction, including CuCl2 [19], [22], [IrCl(cod)]2 and triphenylphosphine [23], Pd(OAc)2 [24], Ag–Pd alloy nanoparticles supported on carbon [21], o-benzenedisulfonimide [1], and ruthenium-grafted hydrotalcite [25]. Moreover, base-mediated modified Friedländer transformations using more than one equivalents of a strong base were also investigated [2]. Unfortunately, difficulties in the cost of catalysts, drastic reaction conditions, low yields, and tedious workup procedures have restricted the application of these methods. For the development of more environmentally benign processes, a greener catalyst that could offer the ease of handling, simple workup, recyclability and reusability should be targeted for the reaction.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are hybrid crystalline porous materials assembled with metal ions and organic linkers, emerging as promising materials with potential applications in several fields [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. Although the application of MOFs in catalysis is a young research area, MOFs have been employed as solid catalysts or catalyst supports for a variety of organic transformations [32], [33], including the three-component (aldehyde–alkyne–amine) coupling reaction [34], the Biginelli reaction [35], asymmetric α-alkylation of aldehydes [36], NO generation from biologically occurring substrates [37], the conventional Friedländer condensation [38], [39], [40], the arylation of aldehydes with arylboronic acids [41], the Paal–Knorr reaction [42], Friedel–Crafts reactions between pyrroles and nitroalkenes [43], Friedel–Crafts alkylation and acylation [44], [45], [46], oxidation [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], alkene epoxidation [55], [56], [57], cycloaddition of CO2 with epoxides [58], cyanosilylation [59], [60], hydrogenation [61], Suzuki cross-coupling [62], [63], Sonogashira reaction [64], transesterification reaction [65], Knoevenagel condensation [66], [67], [68], aldol condensation [69], [70], aza-Michael condensation [71], [72], 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions [73], N-methylation of aromatic primary amines [74], epoxide ring-opening reaction [75], [76], [77], hydrolysis of ammonia borane [78], and cyclopropanation of alkene [79]. However, it is apparent that the application of MOFs in the field of catalysis is still an immature phase and will attract further research in the near future [80]. In this work, we wish to report the use of Cu(BDC) as an efficiently heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer transformation using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as the starting material. The Cu(BDC)-catalyzed protocol offers several advantages as compared to the conventional approach in the formation of quinoline derivatives.
Section snippets
Materials and instrumentation
All reagents and starting materials were obtained commercially from Sigma–Aldrich and Merck, and were used as received without any further purification unless otherwise noted. Nitrogen physisorption measurements were conducted using a Micromeritics 2020 volumetric adsorption analyzer system. Samples were pretreated by heating under vacuum at 150 °C for 3 h. A Netzsch Thermoanalyzer STA 409 was used for thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Catalyst synthesis and characterization
In this work, the Cu(BDC) was synthesized in a yield of 77% by a solvothermal method, according to a slightly modified literature procedure [81]. The Cu-MOF was then characterized by a variety of different techniques. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the Cu(BDC) (Fig. S1) showed the presence of very sharp peaks, which matched well with those previously reported in the literature [81]. Elemental analysis by AAS indicated a copper loading of 3.95 mmol/g. The SEM micrograph of the Cu(BDC) revealed
Conclusions
In summary, highly crystalline porous metal–organic framework Cu(BDC) was synthesized from the reaction of copper nitrate trihydrate and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid by a solvothermal method, and was characterized by a variety of different techniques, including XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR, TGA, AAS, H2-TPR and nitrogen physisorption measurements. The Cu(BDC) could be used as an efficiently heterogeneous catalyst for the modified Friedländer transformation using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as the starting
Acknowledgement
The Vietnam National University – Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) is acknowledged for financial support through Project No. B2013-20-05.
References (93)
- et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2010) - et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2008) - et al.
Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
(2010) - et al.
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
(2007) - et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2012) - et al.
Catal. Commun.
(2008) - et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2009) - et al.
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
(2009) - et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2006) - et al.
Tetrahedron Lett.
(2005)