Elsevier

Agricultural Water Management

Volume 119, March 2013, Pages 135-143
Agricultural Water Management

Evaluation of deficit irrigation for efficient sheep production from permanent sown pastures in a dry continental climate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Deficit irrigation can be a useful management tool to increase water productivity of forage and sheep production from pastures in water deprived areas of the world. A three year study compared sheep production from permanent sown pastures on clay–loam soil in a dry continental climate that were irrigated at four levels in Konya, Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Pastures were established in 2007 with red fescue (Festuca rubra L.), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) and irrigated with 100 (optimum irrigation), 75, 50 or 25% of their full irrigation requirement. Established pastures were grazed rotationally by flocks of weaned lambs between 2008 and 2010. Liveweight gain was approximately 2 kg ha−1 d−1 from the 100 and 75% irrigation treatments. However, lower levels of irrigation caused reductions (P < 0.01) in liveweight gains with animals gaining less than 1 kg ha−1 d−1 in the 25% irrigation treatment. Average total annual animal liveweight production was 498, 445, 380 and 198 kg ha−1 for 100, 75, 50 and 25% irrigation treatments, respectively. The water productivity of the full irrigation treatment per unit of dry matter and meat produced was low, particularly during the summer months, and it increased with deficit irrigation. Deficit irrigation between 50 and 75% of the full requirements during late spring and summer, prior to de-stocking, can provide efficient use of water when water resources are limited. The level of irrigation can be reduced further during the late summer and autumn when stocking rates and the demand for feed or energy from pastures are lower.

Highlights

► Limiting irrigation to 50% of the full requirement, or lower, reduced the animal production potential. ► The water productivity at 100% of the full water requirement was low, particularly during summer months. ► Water productivity of forage and meat production increased with deficit irrigation. ► Deficit irrigation at 50 and 75% of the full requirement, prior to de-stocking pastures in summer, may be a valuable practice.

Introduction

Sheep production is an integral part of crop-livestock farming in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey like in many other dry areas of the world. Animal meat production is in great demand due to the vast increases in the human population of these areas (Hopfenberg and Pimentel, 2001, IFPRI, 2000, Tan et al., 2000). However, poor productivity from overgrazed rangelands does not enable the sustainable intensification of sheep production that is necessary to meet this demand. Rehabilitation of degraded rangelands is not a feasible short-term remedy since it is expensive and may take a long time depending upon the degree of disturbance (Allen, 1995). Alternatively, forages and sown pastures grown on arable land can provide high quality feed to improve animal production (Aganga and Tshwenyane, 2003, Gokkus et al., 2005) and complement rangeland grazing (Bowman and Sowell, 2003).

The erratic and low precipitation often causes feed shortages, and annual and seasonal variations in forage production in most dry areas (Ates et al., 2010, Mills et al., 2008). Supplemental irrigation can extend the growing season, increase reliability and pasture persistence to help attain desirable pasture and animal production (Jensen et al., 2001). However, animal production that relies on irrigated pastures is subject to water scarcity, the same as irrigated field crops in dry areas of the world. Irrigated agricultural production is already under pressure due to declining water resources that force farmers to grow more with less water (Oweis and Hachum, 2008, Postel, 1998). It is, therefore, inevitable that the scarcity of water will require a proper management of the irrigation resources to improve the water productivity in arable lands (McBride, 1994, Oweis and Hachum, 2008). This becomes even more crucial with declining precipitation (IPCC, 2007) and a degradation of environmental quality due to excessive irrigation abstraction in the region (Yilmaz, 2010).

The highest water requirement for optimal crop production has been recorded in Egypt, India, Iraq, Pakistan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan, reflecting the ineffective use of irrigation in hot, arid areas (Doell and Siebert, 2002). The negative impact of this inefficient use of scarce water resources on agricultural production and the environment is projected to be exacerbated by climate change and recurrent droughts (IPCC, 2007). It is likely that the scarcity of water will impact forage production to a larger degree than field crops, which have priority for irrigation resources because of their role in providing food security in most dry areas of the world (Carruthers et al., 1997, Lobell et al., 2008). This situation will put more pressure on animal production systems that rely on irrigated forages and pastures to support meat production in these areas. Thus, the emphasis of irrigation management needs to be focused on maximizing forage and animal production per unit of water consumed. Deficit irrigation, which is defined as water application at a level below full crop requirement, has been promoted as one of the primary means of maintaining productivity and coping with scarce water supplies (Fereres and Soriano, 2006, Oweis and Hachum, 2008).

Several studies have investigated the effects of irrigation on the plant physiology and productivity of pasture and forage plants in small plots (Aranjuelo et al., 2011, Assuero et al., 2002, Justes et al., 2002, Suarez et al., 2003, Vignolio et al., 2002) and have reported a linear relationship between yield and evapotranspiration for a given forage species, which varies between regions and years. In studies where losses from runoff and drainage were negligible, there has generally been a decline in water productivity in response to decreasing water application below optimum irrigation (Farre and Faci, 2006, Kiziloglu et al., 2006). However, little published data is available on the effect of deficit irrigation on sheep production from permanent sown pastures in the dry areas of the world. It is likely that different levels of irrigation will have an impact on pasture dynamics and, therefore, on sheep production. It is important to define the best deficit irrigation strategy for an efficient low-cost sheep production from permanent sown pastures in these areas. The adaptation of water application strategy that sustains environmental quality and improves animal productivity will be directly linked to the sustainability of irrigated pastures. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of deficit irrigation on forage and animal production, and water productivity (units of water to produce a unit of forage or liveweight) in permanent pastures.

Section snippets

Site

The study was conducted within a 1.34 ha paddock at Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Institute (37°51′N, 32°33′E, 1008 m a.s.l.), Konya, Central Anatolia region of Turkey from September 2008 to November 2010. The site has a clay–loam soil with slightly alkaline characteristics. Soil tests taken on 4 April 2007 gave: pH (in water) 7.8, soluble salt 0.05%, organic matter 3.7%, available phosphorous (P) 250 kg ha−1, calcium (Ca) 426 kg ha−1 and potassium (K) 250 kg ha−1.

Pasture establishment and experimental design

A pasture seed

Pasture dry matter production

Total accumulated DM production (kg ha−1 y−1) of pastures irrigated at four levels from 2008 to 2010 is given in Fig. 1. The total annual accumulated DM production ranged from 4070 kg ha−1 in pastures irrigated at 25% of full requirement to 9800 kg ha−1 y−1 for fully irrigated pastures over the three-year period. Dry matter production decreased (P < 0.01) with each decreasing level of irrigation with the 25% treatment having 50% lower production than the 100% treatment. The only exception was that the

Discussion

The study aimed to evaluate whether deficit irrigation would be a useful management strategy to improve the efficiency of sheep production from irrigated pastures in dry areas where water scarcity is a common event. Table 4 compares the average total dry matter and meat production, total water received (rainfall + irrigation) and water productivity under the four treatments. The highest dry matter as well as meat production was observed under the full irrigation (100%) treatment but at a low

Conclusions

  • Permanent sown pastures can provide satisfactory animal production (∼500 kg ha−1 y−1) when 75–100% of the full irrigation requirement is applied in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey.

  • Animal production from pastures irrigated at 75% of the full requirement was similar to that from pastures which received full irrigation but reducing irrigation to 50% of the full requirement caused substantial reduction in the animal production potential.

  • Liveweight production (kg ha−1) in spring and early summer

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Derrick Moot, David Feindel and Hamish Brown for reviewing the manuscript and Dr. Murari Singh for providing advice on statistical analyses. Funding for this project was provided by Turkish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock.

References (43)

  • I. Farre et al.

    Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment

    Journal of Agricultural Water Management

    (2006)
  • S. Rihawi et al.

    Fattening performance of lambs of different Awassi genotypes fed under cost-reducing diets and contrasting housing conditions

    Journal of Small Ruminant Research

    (2010)
  • A.A. Aganga et al.

    Lucerne, Lablab and Leucaena leucocephala forages: production and utilization for livestock production

    Pakistan Journal of Nutrition

    (2003)
  • Allen, E.B., 1995. Restoration ecology: limits and possibilities in arid and semiarid lands. In: Roundy, B.A.,...
  • AOAC

    Official Methods of Analysis

    (1990)
  • I. Aranjuelo et al.

    Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2011)
  • S. Assuero et al.

    Effects of water deficit on Mediterranean and temperate cultivars of tall fescue

    Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

    (2002)
  • S. Ates et al.

    Pasture production and liveweight gain from cocksfoot-subterranean clover pastures grazed at two stocking rates and closed at different times during spring

    Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

    (2008)
  • Ates, S., 2009. Grazing management of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) in South Island (New Zealand)...
  • S. Ates et al.

    Annual herbage production increased when subterranean clover overdrilled into grass-dominant dryland pastures

    Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

    (2010)
  • J.G.P. Bowman et al.

    Technology to complement forage-based beef production systems in the West

    Journal of Animal Science

    (2003)
  • D.I. Bransby

    Compromises in the design and conduct of grazing experiment

  • H.E. Brown et al.

    Sub clover, cocksfoot and lucerne combine to improve stock production

    Proceedings of New Zealand Grassland Association

    (2006)
  • I. Carruthers et al.

    Irrigation and food security in the 21st century

    Irrigation and Drainage Systems

    (1997)
  • J.W.D. Cayley et al.

    Techniques for Measuring Pastures

    (1996)
  • G.P. Cosgrove et al.

    Control of grazing intake

  • P. Doell et al.

    Global modelling of irrigation water requirements

    Water Resources Research

    (2002)
  • E. Fereres et al.

    Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2006)
  • GenStat

    The guide to GenStat Release 8.1 Part 2: statistics

  • A. Gokkus et al.

    The effects of different stocking rates on pasture hay yield and milk yield of goats in different types of pastures, Akdeniz University

    Journal of Agricultural Faculty

    (2005)
  • R. Hopfenberg et al.

    Human population numbers as a function of food supplies

    Environment, Development and Sustainability

    (2001)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Robust climate change adaptation pathways in agricultural water management

      2021, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Deficit irrigation (DI) is widely considered as a sustainable action to maintain food production and save water in arid and semi-arid regions (Fereres and Soriano, 2007; Domínguez et al., 2012; Montoya et al., 2019). The rate of application of DI are reported from 15% to 50% (Ates et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2019; Marek et al., 2017). In the present study, a DI of 20% is investigated which has been applied in some other studies in Iran, too (i.e. Abbasi et al., 2020; Mosavi et al., 2020).

    • The effects of feeding system and breed on the performance and meat quality of weaned lambs

      2020, Small Ruminant Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The high feeding value of annual forages at the vegetative stage can be comparable with concentrate feeding and present high potential for intensification of forage-based sheep production (Keles et al., 2016). While cultivated pastures provide high quality forage and require less labor, the small farm sizes and environmental cost of irrigation are the main bottleneck limiting the scale of irrigated pasture systems in the arid regions (Ates et al., 2013). Several studies have investigated the effects of feedlot- and forage-based feeding of beef and lamb on performance and meat quality (Murphy et al., 1994; Joy et al., 2008; Duckett et al., 2013).

    • Adaptation strategies for agricultural water management under climate change in Europe

      2015, Agricultural Water Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the large number of stakeholders also results in a large number of conflicting views and, therefore, transparent and structured processes are needed to reach participants’ shared understanding of the problem. Local needs and capacities are based on the potential for capacity to develop new irrigation systems (Yoo et al., 2013; Zimmerer, 2011; Siebert et al., 2007) or implement improved technology for irrigation (Ates et al., 2013), desalinisation (Abufayed and El-Ghuel, 2001), water re-use technology (Trinh et al., 2012), alternatives of groundwater management (Causapé et al., 2005), water harvesting (Glendenninga et al., 2012; Moges et al., 2011; Oweis and Hachum, 2005), capacity to develop insurance (Glenk and Fischer, 2010) or capacity to develop water markets (Garrick et al., 2009). The integration of water demands in conjunctive systems allows for the joint management of surface and groundwater resources to overcome dry periods and thus build robustness into water resources systems (Pulido-Velazquez et al., 2011).

    • What about keeping plants well watered?

      2014, Environmental and Experimental Botany
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the paradigm of irrigated agriculture under water deficit might be slowing down possible improvements on the opposite direction, i.e. breeding, management and physiology of well watered plants, to achieve greater efficiency of water use. The majority of studies on yield under drought stress apply elevated tensions, without the control of applying a gradient of treatments within and near the field capacity (Fereres and Soriano, 2007; Morison et al., 2008; Geerts and Raes, 2009; Ates et al., 2013). Despite this trend, there are several studies – cited hereafter – that approach the range within and near field capacity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text