Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 21, Issue 5, May 2014, Pages 685-690
Academic Radiology

Radiologic Education
Predictors of an Academic Career on Radiology Residency Applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.10.019Get rights and content

Rationale and Objectives

To evaluate radiology residency applications to determine if any variables are predictive of a future academic radiology career.

Materials and Methods

Application materials from 336 radiology residency graduates between 1993 and 2010 from the Department of Radiology, Duke University and between 1990 and 2010 from the Department of Radiology, Stanford University were retrospectively reviewed. The institutional review boards approved this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant study with a waiver of informed consent. Biographical (gender, age at application, advanced degrees, prior career), undergraduate school (school, degree, research experience, publications), and medical school (school, research experience, manuscript publications, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, clerkship grades, United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and 2 scores, personal statement and letter of recommendation reference to academics, couples match status) data were recorded. Listing in the Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Online Directory and postgraduation publications were used to determine academic status.

Results

There were 72 (21%) radiologists in an academic career and 264 (79%) in a nonacademic career. Variables associated with an academic career were elite undergraduate school (P = .003), undergraduate school publications (P = .018), additional advanced degrees (P = .027), elite medical school (P = .006), a research year in medical school (P < .001), and medical school publications (P < .001). A multivariate cross-validation analysis showed that these variables are jointly predictive of an academic career (P < .001).

Conclusions

Undergraduate and medical school rankings and publications, as well as a medical school research year and an additional advanced degree, are associated with an academic career. Radiology residency selection committees should consider these factors in the context of the residency application if they wish to recruit future academic radiologists.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The residency files and application materials from radiology residents who graduated between 1993 and 2010 from the Department of Radiology, Duke University and between 1990 and 2010 from the Department of Radiology, Stanford University were reviewed. Residents were grouped for analysis with their entering class, even if they took additional time or did not complete training at the program. Biographical, undergraduate school, and medical school data were recorded from original application

Results

A total of 336 radiologists were included in the analysis, of whom 231 (68%) were men and 105 (32%) were women. Of this group, 72 (21%) were classified as academic and 264 (79%) were not academic. Table 3 shows the information available for each characteristic with a breakdown among all applicants and those with academic or not academic classifications. The univariate analysis showed a positive association between an academic career with attending an elite undergraduate school (P = .003),

Discussion

This study analyzes the largest number of potentially predictive criteria among the published literature to date and provides important additional insights into the predictive influences of residency applications, specifically for the field of radiology. Our data confirm that medical school publications are the most consistent predictive indicator of a future career in academics that is available to selection committees at the time of the residency application. There was a significant

Conclusion

Among 19 variables on radiology residency applications at two institutions over a 20-year period, we found an association between an academic career and undergraduate and medical school rankings and publications, as well as a research year in medical school and an additional advanced degree. None of the other variables examined had a definitive influence on an academic career. Radiology residency selection committees should consider these results if they are planning on recruiting resident

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Funding: The authors have no funding information to disclose.

View full text