Skip to main content
Log in

Gait study and pattern generation of a starfish-like soft robot with flexible rays actuated by SMAs

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the design and development of a starfish-like soft robot with flexible rays and the implementation of multi-gait locomotion using Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) actuators. The design principle was inspired by the starfish, which possesses a remarkable symmetrical structure and soft internal skeleton. A soft robot body was constructed by using 3D printing technology. A kinematic model of the SMA spring was built and developed for motion control according to displacement and force requirements. The locomotion inspired from starfish was applied to the implementation of the multi-ray robot through the flexible actuation induced multi-gait movements in various environments. By virtue of the proposed ray control patterns in gait transition, the soft robot was able to cross over an obstacle approximately twice of its body height. Results also showed that the speed of the soft robot was 6.5 times faster on sand than on a clammy rough terrain. These experiments demonstrated that the bionic soft robot with flexible rays actuated by SMAs and multi-gait locomotion in proposed patterns can perform successfully and smoothly in various terrains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee D V, Biewener A A. Big dog-inspired studies in the locomotion of goats and dogs. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2011, 51, 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trivedi D, Rahn C D, Kier W M, Walker I D. Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2008, 5, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altendorfer R, Koditschek D E, Holmes P. Stability analysis of a clock-driven rigid-body SLIP model for RHex. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2004, 23, 1001–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamada H, Takaoka S, Hirose S. A snake-like robot for real-world inspection applications: The design and control of a practical active cord mechanism. Advanced Robotics, 2013, 27, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd R F, Ilievski F, Choi W, Morin SA, Stokes A A, Mazzeo A D, Chen X, Wang M, Whitesides G M. Multigait soft robot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108, 20400–20403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Correll N, Önal Ç D, Liang H, Schoenfeld E, Rus D. Soft autonomous materials-using active elasticity and embedded distributed computation. In: Khatib O, Kumar V, Pappas G (eds). Experimental Robotics, the 12th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Essaouira, Morocco, 2014, 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McMahan W, Chitrakaran V, Csencsits M, Dawson D, Walker I D, Jones B A, Pritts M, Dienno D, Grissom M, Rahn C D. Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, USA, 2006, 2336–2341.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calisti M, Arienti A, Giannaccini M E, Follador M, Giorelli M, Cianchetti M, Mazzolai B, Laschi C, Dario P. Study and fabrication of bioinspired octopus arm mockups tested on a multipurpose platform. IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Tokyo, Japan, 2010, 461–466.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bar-Cohen Y. Actuation of biologically inspired intelligent robotics using artificial muscles. Industrial Robot, 2003, 30,.

  10. Otake M, Kagami Y, Kuniyoshi Y, Inaba M, Inoue H. Inverse dynamics of gel robots made of electro-active polymer gel. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, 2003, 2299–2304.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seok S, Onal C D, Wood R, Rus D, Kim S. Peristaltic locomotion with antagonistic actuators in soft robotics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2010, 1228–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shiotsu A, Yamanaka M, Matsuyama Y, Nakanishi H, Hara Y, Tsuboi T, Iwade T, Sugiyama Y, Hirai S. Crawling and jumping soft robot KOHARO. Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Robotics, Seoul, Korea, 2005, 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin H T, Leisk G G, Trimmer B. GoQBot: A caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 026007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anna K. Antarctic starfish, Odontastervalidus, distinguish between fed and starved conspecifics. Polar Biology, 2001, 24, 408–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haesaerts, Jangoux M, Flammang P. Adaptations to benthic development: Functional morphology of the attachment complex of the brachiolaria larva in the sea star Asterina gibbosa. Biological Bulletin, 2011, 211, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ormond R F G, Hanscomb N J, Beach D H. Food selection and learning in the crown‐of‐thorns starfish, Acanthaster planci (L). Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 1976, 2, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawrence J M. Starfish: Biology and Ecology of the Aster-oidea, JHU Press, Baltimore, USA, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Starfish, [2014-04-11], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/starfish

  19. Cole L J. Direction of locomotion of the starfish (Asteriasforbesi). Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1913, 14, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chia F S. Some observations on the development and cyclic changes of the oöcytes in a brooding starfish, Leptasteriashexactis. Journal of Zoology, 1968, 154, 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahai R. The starfish twins: two young planetary nebulae with extreme multipolar morphology. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2000, 537, L43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurarie E, Andrews R D, Laidre K L. A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. Ecology Letters, 2009, 5, 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey C, Garneau F X, Himmelman J H. Chemodetection of the predatory seastar Leptasterias polaris by the whelk Buccinum undatum. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1987, 40, 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pincebourde S, Sanford E, Helmuth B. An intertidal sea star adjusts thermal inertia to avoid extreme body temperatures. American Naturalist, 2009, 174, 890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eggeler G, Hornbogen E, Yawny A, Heckmann A, Wagner M. Structural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys. Materials Science and Engineering, 2004, 378, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Li J, Hang G, Wang Y. A flexible hingeless control surface inspired by aquatic animals. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zakerzadeh M R, Sayyaadi H. Experimental comparison of some phenomenological hysteresis models in characterizing hysteresis behavior of shape memory alloy actuators. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2012, 23, 1287–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muhammad A, Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Hwang D Y, Byun D, Goo N S. Improvement of artificial foldable wing models by mimicking the unfolding/folding mechanism of a beetle hind wing. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Otsuka K, Wayman C M. Shape Memory Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Crespi A, Ijspeert A J. Online optimization of swimming and crawling in an amphibious snake robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aoi S, Kazuo T. Locomotion control of a biped robot using nonlinear oscillators. Autonomous Robots, 2005, 19, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Takeda S, Yasushi K. Preliminary study of management of red tide water by the filter feeder Mytilus edulis galloprovincialis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1994, 28, 662–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hendler G, Franz D R. The biology of a brooding sea star, Leptasterias tenera, in Block Island Sound. Biological Bulletin, 1982, 162, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Neill P. Structure and mechanics of starfish body wall. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1989, 147, 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Flocchini P, Prencipe G, Santoro N, Widmayer P. Arbitrary pattern formation by asynchronous, anonymous, oblivious robots. Theoretical Computer Science, 2008, 407, 412–447.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Grady R, Groß R, Christensen A L, Dorigo M. Self-assembly strategies in a group of autonomous mobile robots. Autonomous Robots, 2010, 28, 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erbao Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, S., Dong, E., Jin, H. et al. Gait study and pattern generation of a starfish-like soft robot with flexible rays actuated by SMAs. J Bionic Eng 11, 400–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60053-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60053-6

Keywords

Navigation