Abstract
Detailed 3-Dimensional (3D) wing kinematics was experimentally presented in free flight of a beetle, Trypoxylus dichotomus, which has a pair of elytra (forewings) and flexible hind wings. The kinematic parameters such as the wing tip trajectory, angle of attack and camber deformation were obtained from a 3D reconstruction technique that involves the use of two synchronized high-speed cameras to digitize various points marked on the wings. Our data showed outstanding characteristics of deformation and flexibility of the beetle’s hind wing compared with other measured insects, especially in the chordwise and spanwise directions during flapping motion. The hind wing produced 16% maximum positive camber deformation during the downstroke. It also experienced twisted shape showing large variation of the angle of attack from the root to the tip during the upstroke.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dickinson M. Insect flight. Current Biology, 2006, 16, R309–R314.
Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2002.
Dickinson M H, Lehmann F-O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect fligh. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.
Birch J M, Dickinson M H. Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 412, 729–733.
Srygley R B, Thomas A L R. Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature, 2002, 420, 660–664.
Kim W K, Ko J H, Park H C, Byun D Y. Numerical study on the effects of corrugation of the gliding dragonfly wing. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 260, 523–530.
Le T Q, Byun D Y, Saputra, Ko J H, Park H C, Kim M. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a hovering Coleopteran insect. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2009, 266, 485–495
Wood R J. The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Transactions on robotics, 24, 341–347
Lee Y, Yoo Y, Kim J, Widhiarini S, Park B, Park H C, Yoon K J, Byun D Y. Mimicking a superhydrophobic insect wing by argon and oxygen ion beam treatment on polytetra-fluoroethylene film. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 365–370.
Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D Y. Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.
Fry S N, Sayaman R, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in drosophila. Science, 2003, 300, 495–498.
Wu G H, Zeng L J, Ji L H. Measuring the wing kinematics of a moth (helicoverpa armigera) by a two-dimensional fringe projection method. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 138–142.
Wang H, Zeng L, Yin C. Measuring the body position, attitude and wing deformation of a free-flight dragonfly by combining a comb fringe pattern with sign points on the wing. Measurement Science and Technology, 2002, 13, 903.
Hatze H. High-precision three-dimensional photogra-mmetric calibration and object space reconstruction using a modified DLT-approach. Journal of Biomechanics, 1998, 21, 533–538.
Hedrick T L, Tobalske B W, Biewener A A. How cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) modulate pectoralis power output across flight speeds. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2003 206, 1363–1378.
Tobalske B W, Warrick D R, Clark C J, Powers D R, Hedrick T L, Hyder G A, Biewener A A. Three-dimensional kinematics of hummingbird flight. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2007, 210, 2368–2382.
Tian X, Diaz I J, Middleton K, Galvao R, Israeli E, Roemer A, Sullivan A, Song A, Swartz S, Breuer K. Direct measurements of the kinematics and dynamics of bat flight. Journal of Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2006, 1, S10–S18.
Card G, Dickinson M H. Performance trade-offs in the flight initiation of Drosophila. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2008, 211, 341–353.
Young J, Walker S M, Bomphrey R J, Taylor G K, Thomas ALR. Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight eficiency. Science, 2009, 325, 1549–1552.
Zhao L, Huang Q, Deng X, Sane S P. Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7, 485–497.
Lua K, Lai K, Lim T, Yeo K. On the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering rigid and flexible hawkmoth-like wings. Journal Experiments in Fluids, 2010, 49, 1263–1291.
Wang H, Zeng L, Liu H, Yin C. Measuring wing kinematics, flight trajectory and body attitude during forward flight and turning maneuvers in dragonflies. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2003, 206, 745–23.
Walker S M, Thomas ALR, Taylor G K. Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2009, 6, 351–366.
Willmott A, Ellington C P. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experiment Biology, 1997, 200, 2705–2722.
Frantsevich L, Dai Z, Wang W Y, Zhang Y. Geometry of elytra opening and closing in some beetles (Coleoptera, Polyphaga). Journal of Experiment Biology, 2005, 208, 3145–3158.
Tyson L H. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Journal Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 034001.
Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 2607–2626.
Ishihara, D., Yamashita, Y., Horie, T., Yoshida, S. and Niho, T. Passive maintenance of high angle of attack and its lift generation during flapping translation in crane fly wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 3882–3891.
Dudley R, Ellington C P. Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees: I. kinematics and morphology, Journal of Experimental Biology, 1990, 148, 19–52.
Maybury W J, Lehmann F O. The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 4707–4726.
Josephson R, Malamud J, Stokes D. Power output by an asynchronous flight muscle from a beetle. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2000, 17, 2667–2689.
Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. kinematics. Journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 1984, 305, 41–78.
Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experiment Biology, 2002, 205, 1087–1096.
Zhang G, Sun J, Chen D, Wang Y. Flapping motion measurement of honeybee bilateral wings using four virtual structured-light sensors. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2008, 148, 19–27.
Jin T, Goo N S, Woo S C, Park H C. Use of a digital image correlation technique for measuring the material properties of beetle wing. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2009, 6, 224–231.
Jin T, Goo N S, Park H C. Finite element modeling of a beetle wing. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S145–S149.
Ha N S, Jin T L, Goo N S, Park H C. Anisotropy and non-homogeneity of an Allomyrina Dichotoma beetle hind wing membrane. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 046003.
Heathcote S, Wang Z, Gursul I. Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24, 183–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Truong, T.V., Le, T.Q., Byun, D. et al. Flexible Wing Kinematics of a Free-Flying Beetle (Rhinoceros Beetle Trypoxylus Dichotomus). J Bionic Eng 9, 177–184 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60113-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60113-3