Elsevier

Academic Radiology

Volume 11, Issue 5, May 2004, Pages 526-535
Academic Radiology

Original investigation
Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00723-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

To develop and evaluate a two-stage computerized method that first detects suspicious regions on ultrasound images, and subsequently distinguishes among different lesion types.

Materials and methods

The first stage of detecting potential lesions was based on expected lesion shape and margin characteristics. After the detection stage, all candidate lesions were classified by a Bayesian neural net based on computer-extracted lesion features. Two separate tasks were performed and evaluated at the classification stage: the first classification task was the distinction between all actual lesions and false-positive detections; the second classification task was the distinction between actual cancer and all other detected lesion candidates (including false-positive detections). The neural nets were trained on a database of 400 cases (757 images), consisting of complex cysts and benign and malignant lesions, and tested on an independent database of 458 cases (1,740 images including 578 normal images).

Results

In the distinction between all actual lesions and false-positive detections, Az values of 0.94 and 0.91 were obtained with the training and testing data sets, respectively. Sensitivity by patient of 90% at 0.45 false-positive detections per image was achieved for this detection-plus-classification scheme for the testing data set. Distinguishing cancer from all other detections (false-positives plus all benign lesions) proved to be more challenging, and Az values of 0.87 and 0.81 were obtained during training and testing, respectively. Sensitivity by patient of 100% at 0.43 false-positive malignancies per image was achieved in the detection and classification of cancerous lesions for the testing dataset.

Conclusion

The results show promising performance of the computerized lesion detection and classification method, and indicate the potential of such a system for clinical breast ultrasound.

Section snippets

Materials

Two databases of sonographic images were used in this research. Patients were referred to diagnostic US for various reasons, including young age, dense breast parenchyma with microcalcifications, need for US-guided core biopsy, and for the distinction between cystic and solid lesions in abnormalities detected by mammography. The initial database was obtained from Northwestern University (Chicago, IL), and the second database was collected at the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL), both under

Results

In Figure 1, example images are shown with the computer output, detection points and candidate lesion outlines, together with the outlines by the radiologist for comparison. In the first two examples, the computer detected actual lesions correctly, while in the third example the two lesion candidates identified by the computer are false-positive detections. The comparison of computer outlines with human outlines was the subject of earlier studies (8). Indirectly, however, computer segmentation

Discussion

In this work, we presented a computerized method for detection and classification of lesions on breast US. Evaluation was performed for two schemes to assess whether actual lesions were adequately detected by the computer, and whether our classifier had sufficient potential to distinguish cancers from all other detected lesion candidates. The ability to correctly identify all of the few cancer cases within the testing database was promising, considering the difficulty of the task and

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Luz Venta and Michael Stern for their help in collecting the sonographic databases.

References (17)

  • D.R Chen et al.

    Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks

    Ultrasound Med Biol

    (2002)
  • C.E Metz

    Basic principles of ROC analysis

    Semin Nucl Med

    (1978)
  • L.W Bassett et al.

    Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women < 35 yrs old

    Radiography

    (1991)
  • T.M Kolb et al.

    Occult cancer in women with dense breastsdetection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics

    Radiology

    (1998)
  • C.M Chen et al.

    Breast lesions on sonogramscomputer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • K Horsch et al.

    Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound

    Med Phys

    (2002)
  • M.A Kupinski et al.

    Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital mammography using radial gradient index filtering

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • K Drukker et al.

    Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound

    Med Phys

    (2002)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (104)

  • Deep learning radiomics in breast cancer with different modalities: Overview and future

    2020, Expert Systems with Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    With high sensitivity to calcification, mammographic examination is far better at detecting microcalcifications and clusters of calcifications, which are very important characterizations of breast cancer (Horsch et al., 2006). Ultrasound which uses non-ionizing radiation has been proven to be an important adjunct scanning tool to mammography for breast cancer (Corsetti et al., 2011; Drukker et al., 2004). Ultrasound is more sensitive in dense breasts and effective in distinguishing the cysts from solid masses, which are limited in mammography (Kelly et al., 2010).

  • Breast ultrasound region of interest detection and lesion localisation

    2020, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Fig. 1 shows BUS images with manual pre-selected ROIs marked with ‘+’ and ‘x’. Previous work attempted to automate the process of ROIs selection [10–13]. These methods were based on multi-stage image processing and/or machine learning approaches.

  • Artificial intelligence and interpretations in breast cancer imaging

    2020, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Technical Basis and Clinical Applications
  • Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: A survey

    2018, Pattern Recognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    Scientists do not definitely know what causes breast cancer yet, and only know some risk factors that can increase the likelihood of developing breast cancer: getting older, genetics, radiation exposure, dense breast tissue, alcohol consumption, etc. The key of reducing the mortality is to find signs and symptoms of breast cancer at its early stage by clinic examination [3]. Breast ultrasound (BUS) imaging has become one of the most important and effective modality for the early detection of breast cancer because of its noninvasive, nonradioactive and cost-effective nature [4]; and it is most suitable for large-scale breast cancer screening and diagnosis in low-resource countries and regions.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported in parts by USPHS grant CA89452, and U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command 97-2445.

1

Drs. Giger and Vyborny are shareholders in R2 Technology, Inc. (Los Altos, CA). It is the University of Chicago Conflict of Interest Policy that investigators disclose publicly actual or potential significant financial interest that would reasonably appear to be directly and significantly affected by the research activities.

View full text