Immobilizing and positioning patients for radiotherapy

doi:10.1016/S1053-4296(95)80004-2

Seminars in Radiation Oncology

Volume 5, Issue 2, April 1995, Pages 100-114

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(95)80004-2 Get rights and content

Rigid immobilization of patients and accurate positioning of their targets have long been recognized as critically important aspects of quality radiotherapy. Radiobiological studies have indicated that the slope of the dose-response curve for many tumors is sufficiently large that a dose reduction of 3% to 5% to a portion of the tumor could significantly reduce the probability of local control. On the other hand, accurate positioning combined with rigid immobilization might permit reduced margins around the target, resulting in a decrease in dose to normal tissue and a potential increase in dose to the rarget. The increasing use of computed tomography-based three-dimensional treatment planning programs has made highly conformal dose distributions possible, thus further emphasizing the need for accurate positioning. The development of new immobilization materials and methods has made it possible to immobilize almost any area of the body of a cooperative patient to 3 mm, allowing the use of margins of no more than 5 mm except when target motion within the immobilized patient is an issue. Special techniques for intracrania targets or for targets in the head and neck can yield positioning accuracies of 1 to 2 mm, or even less for invasive immobilization. Through the use of electronic portal imagers, stereo video cameras, or stereo radiography, anatomical reference points can be followed during treatment and the target position varied as needed. Quantitative positioning studies are required for each disease site and immobilization method so that the target position uncertainty, which is the basis for the choice of treatment-planning margins, can be minimized and evaluated, leading to an increased level of uncomplicated local tumor control.

References (90)

GoiteinM et al.
Multi-dimensional treatment planning. II Beam's eye-view, back projection and projection through CT sections
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1983)
MohanR et al.
A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1988)
GalvinJM et al.
Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1993)
PowlisWD et al.
Initiation of multi-leaf collimator conformal radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1993)
MijnheerBJ et al.
What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy?
Radiother Oncol
(1987)
LandbergT et al.
Whole-body-casts for patient immobilization in mantle treatment, treatment of the inverted-Y and moving strip
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1977)
LewinskyBS et al.
Lightcast: An aid to planning, treatment and immobilization in radiotherapy and research
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1976)
MarksJE et al.
The effect of immobilization on localization error in the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer
Clin Radiol
(1976)
DevereuxC et al.
Plastic molds for patient immobilization
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1976)
GoiteinM et al.
Multi-dimensional treatment planning. I. Delineation of anatomy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1983)

RichardsMJS et al.

Errors in reproducing pelvic radiation portals

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1977)

JakobsenA et al.

A new system for patient fixation in radiotherapy

Radiother Oncol

(1987)

BentelGC

First place 1989 Alpha Cradle award winner. Positioning and immobilization device for patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the breast

Med Dosim

(1990)

BentelG

Positioning and immobilization of patients undergoing radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease

Med Dosim

(1991)

BuscherM

A modification of the HS3 thoracic Alpha Cradle for breast/chestwall patients

Med Dosim

(1990)

FrankLE et al.

Third place 1989 Alpha Cradle Award winner. Technical aspects in the use of “belly boards” for small bowel minimization

Med Dosim

(1990)

GoldschmidtEJJ et al.

Second place Alpha Cradle Award winner. Medulloblastoma immobilization and treatment considerations

Med Dosim

(1990)

HookS et al.

Alpha Cradles in breast cancer treatment: Easy immobilization for the potentially difficult breast set up

Med Dosim

(1990)

GerberRL et al.

The use of thermal plastics for immobilization of patients during radiotherapy

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1982)

GoldsonAL et al.

Simple but sophisticated immobilization casts

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1978)

VerheyLJ et al.

Precise positioning of patients for radiation therapy

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1982)

WongJW et al.

Online radiotherapy imaging with an array of fiber-optic image reducers

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1990)

RabinowitzI et al.

Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1985)

ByhardtRW et al.

Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errors

Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys

(1978)

ChenGTY et al.

Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1979)

TatsuzakiH et al.

Importance of precise positioning for proton beam therapy in the base of skull and cervical spine

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1991)

RosenthalSA et al.

Immobilization improves the reproducibility of patient positioning during six-field conformal radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1993)

SoffenEM et al.

Conformal static field therapy for low volume low grade prostate cancer with rigid immobilization

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1991)

LeibelSA et al.

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: Preliminary results of a phase I dose-escalation study

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1994)

NiewaldM et al.

Plastic material used to optimize radiotherapy of head and neck tumors and the mammary carcinoma

Radiother Oncol

(1988)

GriffithsSE et al.

The daily reproducibility of large, complex-shaped radiotherapy fields to the thorax and neck

Clin Radiol

(1986)

ThorntonAFJ et al.

A head immobilization system for radiation simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging

Med Dosim

(1991)

WangCC et al.

A head holder for treatment of head and neck cancers

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1980)

ThorntonAFJ et al.

Threedimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging

Radiother Oncol

(1991)

HuizengaH et al.

Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: A prospective study

Radiother Oncol

(1988)

RosenthalSA et al.

Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurements

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1992)

LutzW et al.

A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1988)

YeungD et al.

Systematic analysis of errors in target localization and treatment delivery in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1994)

SeragoCF et al.

Stereotactic target point verification of an x-ray and CT localizer

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1991)

HartmannGH et al.

Precision and accuracy of stereotactic convergent beam irradiations from a linear accelerator

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1994)

LymanJT et al.

Stereotactic frame for neuroradiology and charged particle Bragg peak radiosurgery of intracranial disorders

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1989)

GillS et al.

Relocatable frame for stereotactic external beam radiotherapy

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1991)

GrahamJD et al.

A non-invasive, relocatable stereotactic frame for fractionated radiotherapy and multiple imaging

Radiother Oncol

(1991)

LaitinenLV et al.

An adapter for computed tomography-guided stereotaxis

Surg Neurol

(1985)

DelannesM et al.

Fractionated radiotherapy of small inoperable lesions of the brain using a non-invasive stereotactic frame

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

(1991)

Cited by (107)

Factors Affecting Isocenter Displacement and Planning Target Volume Margin for Patients With Rectal Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy
2022, Advances in Radiation Oncology
Citation Excerpt :
Most pelvic RT setup error studies include a diversity of diseases; however, we believe that each one warrants a dedicated study due to different setups, types of patients, and disease factors. For patients with rectal cancer, immobilization devices widely used for the sake of reproducibility and decreasing irradiated bowel volume failed to reduce setup errors and affected the needed PTV margin.20-22 Also, the increasing trend of using VMAT for those cases mandates examining the isocenter displacement and the recommended PTV margin precisely.
Setup errors are inherent in the process of daily radiation therapy (RT) delivery. Pelvic RT for rectal cancer is one of the body sites associated with the largest shift among other body sites. This study aimed to evaluate interfraction random and systematic errors and hence propose the optimum planning target volume (PTV) in patients with rectal cancer.
Translational and angular isocenter displacements were retrospectively collected for 189 patients. Random and systematic errors were determined, and then the PTV margin was computed. Effect of positioning, body mass index (BMI), and type of immobilization were studied. Portal images before and after online correction were used to define PTV for no-daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and daily IGRT respectively.
Before the online correction, the systematic errors were 2.5, 2.8, and 3.0 mm for superior-inferior (SI), right-left (RL), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively, compared with 2.1, 1.7, and 1.8 mm after online correction. The random errors were 6.2, 7.4, and 8.2 mm in SI, RL, and AP, respectively, before online correction, compared with 4, 4.2, and 4.5 mm after online correction. The recommended PTV margin was 0.7 and 1.0 cm for daily IGRT and no-daily IGRT, respectively. The prone position and BMI >30 kg/m² warrant higher margins in no-daily IGRT cases, 1.2 and 1.4 cm, respectively.
The prone position, BMI >30 kg/m², and belly board device are associated with larger daily setup errors warranting higher PTV margins for no-daily IGRT; however, that can be avoided by using daily IGRT.
Challenges and impact of patient obesity in radiation therapy practice
2020, Radiography
The prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing globally and has tripled between 1975 and 2016. Obesity is reported within the literature as having a significant impact on medical practice, professionals, imaging departments and healthcare systems. It is not known how this epidemic will impact radiation therapists’ working environment and practice. The aim of this study is to explore the perceived challenges and impacts of patient obesity on radiation therapy practice from the perception of radiation therapists.
All radiation therapists working in the Republic of Ireland were invited to participate. Two focus groups were conducted with 6 and 7 participants respectively. A seven staged method of analysis, using a computerised long table approach was developed and used to analyse the data and create themes related to radiation therapists’ perception of managing obese patients.
Perceived challenges from the radiation therapists were difficulties; (1) Setting up the patient (2) Imaging (3) communication and emotional impact.
An array of concerns were raised during this research about the increase and impact of obese patients on radiation therapists working environment. This study suggests that obese patients can present additional challenges to radiation therapists’ current work practices. It is imperative that we recognise the additional challenges this patient cohort add to daily workflow. Further research is needed to identify the common key issues and how to manage this specific patient group.
At the moment there are no specific management strategies/policies in place for managing obese patients; this study suggests that it is something we need to consider implementing as standard in radiation therapy departments.
A narrative literature review examining cancer treatment issues for patients living with intellectual disabilities
2018, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Citation Excerpt :
It does not directly explore or address cancer treatment barriers in people with ID. Standard procedure for radiotherapy is to lie still on a couch for consecutive days lasting for potentially weeks (Verhey, 1995). This can be potentially stressful for people with ID.
The experiences of cancer care can be mediated by many different factors and this narrative literature review aims to explore the experiences of cancer care in relation to people with intellectual disabilities receiving cancer treatment.
We undertook a search for articles in English from (Jan) 2000–(Feb) 2018 using Medline, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, ASSIA and Wiley. The inclusion criteria are 2000–2018, English language and focussing on experiences of cancer journey. We used a narrative approach and thematically analysed the data.
There were 10 papers that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. The themes generated included communication issues, information giving and decision-making. The literature suggests that communication and decision-making within cancer care are often mediated through support workers or family carers with minimal involvement of the person with intellectual disabilities. Information-giving by health professionals and support workers to people with intellectual disabilities was limited. This was often justified by the perceived distress this may cause.
Training for health professionals and support workers in supporting people with intellectual difficulties is required for more effective communication in cancer care.
Effect of image registration on 3D absorbed dose calculations in <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTATOC peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
2018, Physica Medica
Citation Excerpt :
When dealing with sequential functional imaging, the misalignment of sequential scans is a critical aspect, by which the global accuracy of the dosimetry calculations can be strongly affected. Misregistration errors can derive from changes in patient repositioning, organ deformation, tumour progression/regression between different scans and respiratory motion, as reported also by some critical works related to PET/CT diagnostics [8] and external beam radiotherapy [9,10]. Whatever the source of these errors, they are likely to lead to a poor estimation of organ absorbed doses at the voxel level, and consequently to a sub-optimal treatment plan and to an erroneous prediction of MRT treatment response.
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective MRT (molecular radiotherapy) treatment, which consists of multiple administrations of a radiopharmaceutical labelled with ¹⁷⁷Lu or ⁹⁰Y. Through sequential functional imaging a patient specific 3D dosimetry can be derived. Multiple scans should be previously co-registered to allow accurate absorbed dose calculations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of image registration algorithms on 3D absorbed dose calculation.
A cohort of patients was extracted from the database of a clinical trial in PRRT. They were administered with a single administration of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC. All patients underwent 5 SPECT/CT sequential scans at 1 h, 4 h, 24 h, 40 h, 70 h post-injection that were subsequently registered using rigid and deformable algorithms. A similarity index was calculated to compare rigid and deformable registration algorithms. 3D absorbed dose calculation was carried out with the Raydose Monte Carlo code.
The similarity analysis demonstrated the superiority of the deformable registrations (p < .001).
Average absorbed dose to the kidneys calculated using rigid image registration was consistently lower than the average absorbed dose calculated using the deformable algorithm (90% of cases), with percentage differences in the range [−19; +4]%. Absorbed dose to lesions were also consistently lower (90% of cases) when calculated with rigid image registration with absorbed dose differences in the range [−67.2; 100.7]%. Deformable image registration had a significant role in calculating 3D absorbed dose to organs or lesions with volumes smaller than 100 mL.
Image based 3D dosimetry for ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC PRRT is significantly affected by the type of algorithm used to register sequential SPECT/CT scans.
Development of a room laser based real-time alignment monitoring system using an array of photodiodes
2016, Physica Medica
To develop a real-time alignment monitoring system (RAMS) to compensate for the limitations of the conventional room-laser-based alignment system. To verify the feasibility of the RAMS, reproducibility and accuracy tests were conducted.
RAMS was composed of a room laser sensing array (RLSA), an electric circuit, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC), and a control PC. The RLSA was designed to arrange photodiodes in a pattern that results in the RAMS having a resolution of 1 mm. The photodiodes were used for quantitative assessment of the alignment condition. To verify the usability of the developed system, we conducted tests of temporal reproducibility, repeatability, and accuracy.
The results of the temporal reproducibility test suggested that the signal of the RAMS was stable with respect to time. Further, the repeatability test resulted in a maximum coefficient of variance of 1.14%, suggesting that the signal of the RAMS was stable over repeated set-ups. The accuracy test confirmed that the “on” and “off” signals could be distinguished by signal intensity, considering that the “off” signal was below 75% of the “on” signal in every case. In addition, we confirmed that the system can detect 1 mm of movement by monitoring the pattern of the “on” and “off” signals.
We developed a room laser based alignment monitoring system. The feasibility test verified that the system is capable of quantitative alignment monitoring in real time. We expect that the RAMS can propose the potential of the room laser based alignment monitoring method.
Comparison of a new immobilization method using a reusable 3-point fixation cylinder system and bite-block type immobilization methods in veterinary radiotherapy
2024, Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text