Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of gating system, sand grain size, and mould coating on microstructure and mechanical properties of thin-wall ductile iron

  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two gating systems namely stepped and tapered runners were used to cast strip samples with different thicknesses by CO2/silicate process using sand grain sizes of AFS 151 and 171. To assess the effect of mould coating on the properties of thin-wall ductile iron, half of the moulds were coated whilst the rest were not coated. Molten metal with the carbon equivalent of 4. 29% was prepared and poured at 1450 °C. Microstructure of the specimens was analyzed by optical and scanning electron microscopes. Count, area fraction, roundness and diameter of the graphite nodules of the samples were measured by image analyzer. Brinell hardness and tensile tests of all the samples were also conducted. The results show that by using stepped runner gating system with uncoated and coarse sand mould, roundness and count of the graphite nodules decrease whereas diameter and area fraction increase. Although fine sand and coated mould cause longer distance of molten metal travel, hardness and strength of the samples decrease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi J O, Kim J Y, Choi C O, et al. Effect of Rare Earth Element on Microstructure Formation and Mechanical Properties of Thin Wall Ductile Iron Castings [J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 2004, 383A(2): 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sosa A D, Echeverría M D, Moneada O J, et al. Surface Reactivity of Thin Wall Ferritic Ductile Iron. The Effect of Nodule Count and Grinding Variables [J]. Materials Letters, 2008, 62 (1): 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Druschitz A P, Fitzgerald D C. Lightweight Iron and Steel Castings for Automotive Applications [C] //Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE 2000 World Congress. Detroit: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2000: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dommarco R C, Jaureguiberry A J, Sikora J A. Rolling Contact Fatigue Resistance of Ductile Iron With Different Nodule Counts and Matrix Microstructures [J]. Wear, 2006, 261(2): 172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bockus S, Venckunas A, Žaldarys G. Relation Between Section Thickness, Mictostructure and Mechanical Properties of Ductile Iron Castings [J]. Materials Science (MEDŽIAGOTYRA), 2008, 14(2): 115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz S, Warren A. Thin Wall Iron Castings: Planning the Future [J]. Foundry Management and Technology, 1997, 125: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell J. Thin Wall Castings [J]. Materials Science and Technology, 1988, 4(3): 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schrems K K, Hawk J A, Dogan Ö N, et al. Statistical Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Thin-Walled Ductile Iron Castings [J]. SAE Transactions, 2003, 112(5): 420.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sheikh M A. Production of Carbide-Free Thin Ductile Iron Castings [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2008, 15(5): 552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horie H, Kowata T, Chida A. Effect of Rare Earth Elements on Chill Formation and Nodule Count in Thin-Section Spheroidal Graphite Cast Iron [J]. Journal of Cast Metals, 1988, 1 (2): 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rundman K B. Metal Casting, Reference Book for MY4130 [M]. Houghton: Michigan Technological University, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kippola D E, Goodrich G M. Factors Affecting Ductile Iron’s Impact Tensile Strength [J]. Modern Casting, 2001, 4: 42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dommarco R C, Sousa M E, Sikora J A. Abrasion Resistance of High Nodule Count Ductile Rolling Contact Fatigue Resistance of Ductile Iron With Different Matrix Microstructures [J]. Wear, 2004, 257(11): 1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Labrecque C, Gagné M, Javaid A. Optimizing the Mechanical Properties of Thin-Wall Ductile Iron Castings [J]. AFS Transactions, 2005, 113(5): 677.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Osafune Y, Yuyama M. Microstructure and Properties of Austempered Ductile Cast Iron With Refined Graphite Nodules [J]. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 2008, 21(1/2/3/4): 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borrajo J M, Martinez R A, Boeri R E, et al. Shape and Count of Free Graphite Particles in Thin Wall Ductile Iron Castings [J]. ISIJ International, 2002, 42(3): 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Costa N, Machado N, Silva F S. Influence of Graphite Nodules Geometrical Features on Fatigue Life of High-Strength Nodular Cast Iron [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2008, 17(3): 352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedersen K M, Tiedje N S. Graphite Nodule Count and Size Distribution in Thin-Walled Ductile Cast Iron [J]. Materials Characterization, 2008, 59(8): 1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dix L P, Ruxanda R, Torrance J, et al. Static Mechanical Properties of Ferritic and Pearlitic Lightweight Ductile Iron Castings [C] //Frink K. AFS Transactions, Vol. 111 Proceeding of 107th Annual Casting Congress. Milwaukee: American Foundry Society, 2003: 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Jafari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jafari, H., Idris, M.H., Ourdjini, A. et al. Influence of gating system, sand grain size, and mould coating on microstructure and mechanical properties of thin-wall ductile iron. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 17, 38–45 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60195-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60195-1

Key words

Navigation