6 Screening and surveillance of pregnancy hypertension—an economic approach to the use of daycare

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80214-7Get rights and content

Summary

Frequent measurement of blood pressure is an accepted part of routine outpatient antenatal care. Women found to have mild hypertension may be further monitored for signs of progressive disease, while women with proteinuria or severe hypertension may be admitted for more intensive surveillance or treatment. In practice, the course and ultimate severity of this disorder are unpredictable and women with mild hypertension are frequently admitted. Recently, daycare has grown as an option for assessing women with hypertension as it offers the advantage of more extensive evaluation than is possible at an outpatient clinic and is widely assumed to be more cost-effective than conventional management. However, its use in obstetrics has not been subject to a formal economic appraisal. Such an evaluation is currently being carried out in two hospitals in Scotland, one of which uses daycare and inpatient admissions in the management of hypertension and one of which uses domiciliary midwife visits as well as hospital beds. Preliminary results suggest that the pregnancy outcome in terms of birthweight, gestation at delivery, admission to a special unit, etc., are the same in the two units for women with mild hypertension (diastolic 90–99 mmHg, no proteinuria). The costs per patient were less in the hospital with a daycare unit. These lower individual costs, however, do not mean that the overall costs to the health service are less in a hospital with daycare. This will depend on the average number of visits to daycare for women with mild hypertension, the proportion of hypertensive women receiving daycare, whether freed inpatient beds are closed or redeployed, and the capital costs of establishing a day unit. Data has also been collected on women's costs and views which will ultimately be presented and should play a part in any decision to implement or continue daycare.

References (35)

  • HallM et al.

    Is routine antenatal care worthwhile?

    Lancet

    (1980)
  • MorV et al.

    Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients: a random assignment trial

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

    (1988)
  • RussellIT et al.

    Day-case surgery for hernias and haemorrhoids

    Lancet

    (1977)
  • AnandKB et al.

    Cost and effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital

    Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London

    (1982)
  • BairdD

    Epidemiological aspects of hypertensive pregnancy

    Clinics in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1977)
  • CampbellDM et al.

    Pre-eclampsia in a second pregnancy

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1985)
  • ColeS

    Scottish maternity and neonatal records

  • CollinsR et al.

    Pharmacological prevention and treatment of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy

  • EvansRG

    Alternatives to traditional care at Children's Hospital, Vancouver: the economic studies of cost savings

  • EvansRG et al.

    Surgical day care: measurements of the economic payoff

    Canadian Medical Association Journal

    (1980)
  • GerardK

    An appraisal of the cost-effectiveness of alternative day care settings for frail elderly people

    Age and Ageing

    (1988)
  • HallM et al.

    Antenatal care in practice

  • HallM et al.

    Geographical epidemiology of hypertension in pregnancy

  • HaworthEA et al.

    Day surgery: does it add to or replace inpatient surgery?

    British Medical Journal

    (1987)
  • HepburnM

    The role of antenatal inpatient care in obstetric practice

    MD thesis, University of Edinburgh

    (1987)
  • Hildrick-SmithM

    Geriatric day hospitals—changing emphasis in costs

    Age and Ageing

    (1984)
  • KaplanM

    Day care experiment proves cost-effective

    Hospitals

    (1981)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text