Micromechanical devices with embedded electro-thermal-compliant actuation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(00)00563-XGet rights and content

Abstract

At the micro-scale, thermal actuation provides larger forces compared to the widely-used electrostatic actuation. In this paper, we highlight another advantage of thermal actuation, viz. the ease with which it can be utilized to achieve a novel embedded electro-thermal-compliant (ETC) actuation for MEMS. The principle of ETC actuation is based on the selective non-uniform Joule heating and the accompanying constrained thermal expansion. It is shown here that appropriate topology and shape of the structures give rise to many types of actuators and devices. Additionally, selective doping of silicon ETC devices is used to enhance the non-uniform heating and thus the deformation. A number of novel ETC building blocks and devices are described, and their analysis and design issues are discussed. The devices were microfabricated using MCNC’s MUMPs foundry process as well as a bulk-micromachining process called PennSOIL (Penn silicon-on-insulator layer). The designs are validated with the simulations and the experimental observations. The experimental measurements are quantitatively compared with the theoretical predictions for a novel ETC microactuator with selective doping.

Introduction

In recent years, thermal actuation in micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) has received considerable attention. When compared to the widely-used electrostatic microactuation, thermal actuation provides larger forces and is also easier to control [1]. In this paper, we demonstrate a third advantage of thermal actuation by presenting a number of micro-devices with embedded actuation. In embedded actuation, the mechanism and the actuator become indistinguishable. That is, the actuation is built into the mechanical structure.

Differential expansion of a laminate made of two materials of unequal thermal expansion coefficients, the bi-metallic or bimorph effect [2], is well known. This has been used effectively in MEMS to generate large forces [3], [4], [5], [6]. External heating or internal Joule heating causes elastic structures to expand. If constrained mechanically, these structures will generate forces making them suitable for actuation. Such actuators were also reported in the literature [1], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Among the latter category of actuators, the ones presented in [13], [14] are most relevant to the type of actuation discussed in this paper. The electro-thermal actuator, also called a heatuator, [8] takes advantage of the shape to create “bi-metallic” effect using a single material as shown in Fig. 1a. When current is passed through the folded-beam structure from one mechanically-anchored electrode to the other, the narrow portion gets hotter than the wide portion because of higher current density and the ensuing larger Joule heating. Therefore, the narrow arm tends to expand more than the wide arm, and they achieve thermo-elastic equilibrium by bending toward the wide arm.

Our modification to the heatuator is shown in Fig. 1b. As shown here, if we pass current through the narrow and wide arms in parallel rather than in series, the structure will then bend towards the narrow arm. This is because the resistance of the wide arm is smaller (note: resistance, R=(resistivity×length)/area=(ρl)/A) and hence draws larger current and gets hotter than the narrow arm. This parallel connection gives rise to new ways of achieving the selective heating of a flexible continuum, and leads to the concept of embedded electro-thermal-compliant (ETC) actuation.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. The principle of actuation of ETC devices is described in Section 2. The sequential analysis of current distribution, temperature distribution, and thermo-elastic deformation and the related issues are considered in Section 3. In Section 4, the fabrication of ETC microactuators is discussed. A new bulk-micromachining process that uses silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers called PennSOIL (Penn silicon-on-insulator layer) is described. A number of designs for basic ETC building blocks and various ways of combining them into larger systems, including a three degree of freedom parallel manipulator, are described in Section 5. Experimental data is presented in Section 6 for some of the designs. After discussing the results and future work in Section 6, some concluding remarks are made in Section 7.

Section snippets

Principle of embedded ETC actuation

A constrained elastic structure deforms upon heating. The geometrical shape of the structure, the manner in which the structure is supported at its boundaries, and the material properties influence the thermally-induced deformations. Appropriate non-uniform heating is likely to give more deformation at the desired points than uniform heating of the whole structure. In micromechanical structures, achieving non-uniform heating is possible through internal Joule heating. As shown in Fig. 1a and b,

Sequential ETC analysis

The steady-state simulation of the devices with embedded ETC actuation entails the sequential solution of three sets of differential equations that govern the electric current, thermal, and thermo-elastic behaviors. First, the current distribution in the structure for specified voltage boundary conditions is determined by solving the following equation for continuity of current [15]:·J+iv=0where iv is the current source per unit volume, J the conduction current density vector 1/ρE, ρ the

Fabrication

The planar ETC micro-devices can be made using a single, electrically insulated, mechanically released layer. Any conducting material with adequate mechanical flexibility (i.e. Young’s modulus) and strength can be used as the structural material. As there is no other limitation, almost any micromachining process with a single releasable layer can be used. In this work, a surface micromachining process of MUMPs [23] and a bulk micromachining process (PennSOIL) were used.

MUMPs is a general

Design of ETC building blocks and micro-devices

The mechanical design goal for the ETC devices is to obtain a variety of motions in a plane such as bending, lateral motion, and translational expansion and contraction. Minimum number of anchor points is also desired. The electrical design goal is to be able to pass current from one end of the device to the other end. This is in contrast to the type of arrays of heatuators in [8] where each heatuator needs to be anchored separately and current should be passed separately. A few basic building

Experimental results and discussion

Some of the fabricated devices were tested on a probe station by applying voltage differential using ordinary power supply unit. The deflections were measured visually using an eyepiece equipped with a reticle. Adjacent to many of the devices, a Vernier scale was also fabricated so that a more accurate measurement of the deflection is possible. With the available equipment, the deflection was resolved up to 2 μm in this visual measurement. The applied dc voltage was increased until the device

Conclusions

A novel embedded ETC actuation for micro-devices made using any conducting material and additional design freedom made possible by selective doping for silicon are described in this paper. In embedded ETC actuation, complete integration of the mechanism and actuator is possible to the extent that the two become indistinguishable. A number of ETC building blocks encompassing basic behaviors of lateral motion, expansion, and contraction are presented. A few devices that integrate the building

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Vladimir Dominko, the manager of the Microfrabrication Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania, for his help and advice in microfabrication, and Mr. Jun Li and Mr. Nilesh Mankame for their help in device testing. This research is supported by a CAREER Award (#DMI97-33916) by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to the second author (GKA). The NSF-supported Summer Undergraduate Fellowship in Sensor Technologies (SUNFEST) to the first author (TM) is also

Timothy Moulton obtained his BSME and MSME, both in Mechanical Engineering, at the University of Pennsylvania in 1999 and 2000, respectively. He is currently working for IDEO. His research interests include MEMS, controls, and product design.

References (25)

  • L. Lin et al.

    Electrothermal responses of lineshape microstructures

    Sens. Actuators A

    (1996)
  • C.G. Keller, R.T. Howe, Hexsil tweezers for teleoperated micro-assembly, in: Proceedings of the 10th Annual...
  • S.P. Timoshenko, J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York,...
  • W. Benecke, W. Riethmuller, Applications of silicon microactuators based on bimorph structures, in: Proceedings of the...
  • N. Takeshima, H. Fujita, Polyimide bimorph actuators for a ciliary motion system, Micromechanical Sensors, Actuators,...
  • W.-H. Chu, M. Mehregany, Microfabricated tweezers with a large griping force and a large range of motion, in:...
  • X.-Q. Sun, X. Gu, W.N. Carr, Lateral in-plane displacement microactuators with combined thermal and electrostatic...
  • H. Guckel, J. Klein, T. Christenson, K. Skrobis, M. Laudon, E.G. Lovell, Thermomagnetic metal flexure actuators,...
  • J. Comtois, V. Bright, Surface micromachined polysilicon thermal actuator arrays and applications, in: Proceedings of...
  • Ph. Lerch et al.

    Modelization and characterization of asymmetrical thermal microactuators

    J. Micromech. Microeng.

    (1996)
  • O. Sigmund, Topology optimization in multiphysics problems, in: Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium,...
  • C.S. Pan et al.

    An electro-thermally and laterally driven polysilicon microactuator

    J. Microeng. Micromech.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    Timothy Moulton obtained his BSME and MSME, both in Mechanical Engineering, at the University of Pennsylvania in 1999 and 2000, respectively. He is currently working for IDEO. His research interests include MEMS, controls, and product design.

    G.K. Ananthasuresh obtained his Mechanical Engineering degrees from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (BS, 1989), University of Toledo (MS, 1991), and University of Michigan (PhD, 1994). He was a post-doctoral research associate in the Microsystems Technology Laboratories in M.I.T. for 18 months before joining the University of Pennsylvania as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics in September 1996. His research interests include compliant mechanisms, topology optimization, modeling and design of MEMS, microfabrication, and mechanism design.

    View full text