Increased morbid risk for schizophrenia in families of in-patients with bipolar illness
Introduction
The Kraepelinian distinction between schizophrenic and manic-depressive psychoses is still an enduring tradition in psychiatry. Debates about the adequacy of the distinction should consider the prominent contribution of family studies. Recent findings suggest that the familial liability to schizophrenia is, at least in part, a liability to develop psychosis (Erlenmeyer-Kimling et al., 1997, Kendler et al., 1993, Taylor, 1992). If this were so, one would expect a higher morbid risk (MR) of schizophrenia in the relatives of bipolar disorder at the severest and psychotic end of the disease spectrum. In addition, one would expect, in analogy with findings in relatives of patients with schizophrenia (Sham et al., 1994, Verdoux et al., 1996), a higher familial morbid risk for schizophrenia in bipolar patients with early onset, poor prognosis and female gender. In order to examine these hypotheses, we conducted a familial MR study in a clinically and biologically homogeneous sample of bipolar inpatients and a group of sociodemographically matched controls.
Section snippets
Bipolar patients
Unrelated probands with a well-documented history of bipolar disorder who were admitted to the state psychiatric hospital, Clı́nica Mental Santa Coloma (Barcelona), were recruited from 1994 to 1996. Both the patients and their relatives gave informed consent before inclusion in the study. The patient sample consisted of 103 unrelated white subjects (43 men and 60 women) born in Spain. Each patient was personally interviewed by two experienced psychiatrists (RG or VV) to determine DSM-III-R
Results
First-degree relatives of patients had a higher risk for bipolar disorder [cases MR=4.9%, controls MR=0.3%, RR=14.2; 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.1–64.2; P=0.001], schizoaffective disorder (cases MR=1.5%, controls MR=0.0%; P=0.021), schizophrenia (cases MR=2.8%, controls MR=0.6%; RR=4.9; 95% CI=1.3–18.8; P=0.022) and unspecified functional psychoses (cases MR=2.3, controls MR=0.6%; RR=4.0; 95% CI=1.0–16.3; P=0.054) than first-degree relatives of controls (Table 2). Although the effect was
Methodological issues
A possible bias in our study was that the psychiatrists who assessed family history were not blind to the case/control status of probands. Nevertheless, the use of diagnostic criteria, consensus best estimate method and the high score of the FH-RDC quality of information scale obtained in our study should assure the quality of the methods. Although the family history method has been shown to be of only moderate sensitivity, the FH-RDC structured interview has been validated (Andreasen et al.,
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant (91B/96-97) from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia and the British Council, to Lourdes Fañanás and Jim van Os. Blanca Gutiérrez was awarded a Ph.D. grant by the Vicerrectorat de Recerca from the Universitat de Barcelona. The authors thank the patients and families for their collaboration.
References (38)
- et al.
Congenital dermatoglyphic malformations in severe bipolar disorder
Psychiatry Res.
(1998) - et al.
Affective illness and schizophrenia in families with multiple schizophrenic members: independent illnesses or variant gene(s)?
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
(1995) - et al.
Validity of the family history method for identifying schizophrenia related disorders
Psychiatry Res.
(1997) - et al.
Cities, winter birth, and schizophrenia
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
The family history method using diagnostic criteria: reliability and validity
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(1977) - et al.
The familial history approach to diagnosis. How useful is it?
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(1986) - et al.
22q11 deletion syndrome in adults with schizophrenia
Am. J. Med. Genet.
(1998) - et al.
Life events and psychosis. Initial results from the Camberwell Collaborative Psychosis Study
Br. J. Psychiatry
(1993) - et al.
Establishing the onset of psychotic illness
Am. J. Psychiatry
(1993) - et al.
Effects of informant mental disorder in psychiatric family history data
Am. J. Psychiatry
(1994)
Is there a genetic Kraepelinian dichotomy for manic-depressive illness and schizophrenia? Con: the demise of the Kraepelinian binary systems as a prelude to genetic advance
The use of epidemiology for risk factor research in schizophrenia: an overview and methodological critique
Meta-analyses of studies of ventricular enlargement and cortical sulcal prominence in mood disorders. Comparisons with controls or patients with schizophrenia
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
Family History-Research Diagnostic Criteria
The New York high-risk project
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
Scaled version of the general health questionnaire
Psychol. Med.
FH-RDC. Criterios diagnósticos de investigación. Historia familiar
Early- and late-onset bipolar affective disorder. A genetic study
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
A DSM-III family study of the nonschizophrenic psychotic disorders
Am. J. Psychiatry
Cited by (90)
Bipolar
2021, BipolarStratifying empiric risk of schizophrenia among first degree relatives using multiple predictors in two independent Indian samples
2016, Asian Journal of PsychiatryMolecular Architecture and Neurobiology of Bipolar Disorder
2016, Genomics, Circuits, and Pathways in Clinical NeuropsychiatryA comparison of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder: Results from the Second Australian national psychosis survey
2015, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Lichtenstein et al. (2009) found that first-degree relatives of persons with SCZ or BD were at increased risk of these two disorders. Valles et al. (2000) showed that relatives of probands with BD have an increased risk of SCZ, whereas relatives of probands with SCZ have an increased risk of BD. The authors concluded that psychosis may be a nonspecific indicator of illness severity that is not limited to schizophrenia.
Social cognition and functional capacity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
2014, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :Approximately half of patients with BD exhibit psychotic features throughout the course of illness. There is considerable evidence that this subset of individuals exhibits common neurobiological, cognitive, and familial markers with other psychotic disorders that cross diagnostic boundaries (Valles et al., 2000; Bora et al., 2008; Moskvina et al., 2009; Allen et al., 2010; Green et al., 2010). There is some implication that social cognition would follow a similar pattern, given that psychosis alters the processing of emotions, social information, and mentalization, and affects interpersonal relationships and community functioning (Van Hooren et al., 2008).