Quelques résultats nouveaux sur les méthodes de projectionNew results on several projection methods

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4442(01)02157-7Get rights and content

Résumé

Nous revisitons les méthodes de projection de Chorin–Temam du type correction de pression et nous introduisons une nouvelle classe de méthodes que nous appelons correction de vitesse. Pour une variante de la méthode de correction de pression et une variante de la méthode de correction de vitesse, nous prouvons une convergence en O(δt2) sur la vitesse en norme L2 et une convergence en O(δt3/2) sur la vitesse en norme H1 et la pression en norme L2. Nous montrons aussi que les méthodes de correction de vitesse fournissent le bon cadre fonctionel pour l'analyse des méthodes de splitting introduites dans [4,3]. Cette Note fournit donc en corollaire le premier résultat de stabilité et de convergence pour les méthodes [4,3].

Abstract

We revisit fractional step projection methods for solving the Navier–Stokes equations. We study a variant of pressure-correction methods and introduce a new class of velocity-correction methods. We prove stability and O(δt2) convergence in the L2 norm of the velocity for both variants. We also prove O(δt3/2) convergence in the H1 norm of the velocity and the L2 norm of the pressure. We show that the new family of projection methods can be related to a set of methods introduced in [4,3]. As a result, this Note provides the first rigorous proof of stability and convergence of the methods introduced in [4,3].

Références (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • A fractional-step DG-FE method for the time-dependent generalized Boussinesq equations

    2023, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The fractional-step method is based on the idea of totally decoupling the nonlinearity from incompressibility in Navier–Stokes equations. Also known as the projection method, this method was first introduced by Chorin [28] and Temam [29], and developed into various kinds of schemes (see [30–40]). The DG method was first introduced by Reed and Hill for hyperbolic equations [41], and analysed by Lesaint and Raviart in [42,43].

  • A rotational velocity-correction projection method for unsteady incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equations

    2020, Computers and Mathematics with Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    In [19], a decoupling penalty finite element method for the stationary incompressible magnetohydrodynamics equation was shown. As we know, in the literature, some fractional step methods are often referred as projection methods, which can be classified into three classes, namely, the pressure-correction methods (see [20,21]), the velocity-correction methods (see [22,23]), and the consistent splitting methods (see [24,25]). Pressure-correction schemes are time-marching techniques composed of two sub-steps for each time step: the pressure is treated explicitly or ignored in the first sub-step and is corrected in the second.

  • Optimal first-order error estimates of a fully segregated scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations

    2017, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some current variants of projection methods are: rotational pressure-correction schemes [4–6], velocity-correction schemes [7,8], consistent-splitting schemes [9,6,10] and penalty pressure-projection schemes [11–13].

  • A robust iterative scheme for finite volume discretization of diffusive flux on highly skewed meshes

    2009, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
    Citation Excerpt :

    It could also be used directly in algorithms where a Poisson equation is inevitable, like projection velocity–pressure coupling algorithms [15–17].

  • An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows

    2006, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, if (2.6) has a steady-state solution as t → +∞ (assuming f is independent of t), and if the discrete steady-state problem (8.2) has spurious pressure modes, then all the algorithms (3.17)–(3.19), (4.8)–(4.10), or (5.9)–(5.11) will give at steady-state a pressure field that is defined up to an arbitrary spurious mode. The above argument is developed in more details in Guermond and Quartapelle [22], Guermond and Shen [26], and Minev [38]. In a finite element method, the Neumann boundary condition is usually enforced naturally.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text