Learning to tell Neoproterozoic time

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(99)00067-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In 1989, the International Commission on Stratigraphy established a Working Group on the Terminal Proterozoic Period. Nine years of intensive, multidisciplinary research by scientists from some two dozen countries have markedly improved the framework for the correlation and calibration of latest Proterozoic events. Three principal phenomena — the Marinoan ice age, Ediacaran animal diversification, and the beginning of the Cambrian Period — specify the limits and character of this interval, but chemostratigraphy and biostratigraphy based on single-celled microfossils (acritarchs), integrated with high-resolution radiometric dates, provide the temporal framework necessary to order and evaluate terminal Proterozoic tectonic, biogeochemical, climatic, and biological events. These data also provide a rational basis for choosing the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) that will define the beginning of this period. A comparable level of stratigraphic resolution may be achievable for the preceding Cryogenian Period, providing an opportunity to define this interval, as well, in chronostratigraphic terms — perhaps bounded at beginning and end by the onset of Sturtian glaciation and the decay of Marinoan ice sheets, respectively. Limited paleontological, isotopic, and radiometric data additionally suggest a real but more distant prospect of lower Neoproterozoic correlation and stratigraphic subdivision.

Introduction

The sphinx of classical mythology was a fabulous hybrid: woman above and lion below, with the wings of an eagle. Easily enough imagined, sphinxes must nonetheless have been difficult to depict convincingly, the central challenge being to join disparate parts into a seamless whole. The geological time scale is something of a stratigraphic sphinx, and the problem of connecting a biostratigraphically conceived and chronostratigraphically defined Phanerozoic time scale to Archean and Proterozoic scales based strictly on geochronometry is one that classical artists would appreciate. The stratigraphic ‘join’ is the Neoproterozoic Era, its base designated as 1000 Ma and its top defined by the initial Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Cambrian Period (Plumb, 1991; Fig. 1). Of course, the Neoproterozoic Era has, itself, been divided into three periods, the geochronometrically defined (and seldom used) Tonian and Cryogenian periods and the yet to be ratified terminal Proterozoic period, or Neoproterozoic III (Plumb, 1991). Insofar as the terminal Proterozoic period will be defined as the interval between an initial boundary GSSP (not yet chosen) and the beginning of the succeeding Cambrian Period (GSSP ratified; Landing, 1994), this further specifies the ‘join’ as the initial GSSP of Neoproterozoic III.

In 1992, Knoll and Walter reviewed what was then nascent progress in understanding terminal Proterozoic stratigraphy and Earth history. Seven years later, in the wake of an extensive international research effort, it is timely to revisit the conclusions and recommendations of Knoll and Walter (1992) and to cast a critical eye backward onto earlier Neoproterozoic time.

Section snippets

Neoproterozoic III

It has long been recognized that in many parts of the world a distinctive sedimentary succession lies directly beneath basal Cambrian rocks. This package has been identified by various names, including Sinian, Vendian, Ediacaran, and Ediacarian (Harland et al., 1989), but in all cases glaciogenic rocks and Ediacaran fossils figure prominently in definition and characterization. Catalyzed by the creation of a formal working group (under the auspices of the International Commission on

How many ice ages?

The stratigraphy of the Cryogenian Period (Plumb, 1991) — the time of ice ages — lies at the heart of any effort to interpret Neoproterozoic Earth history. The Marinoan ice age may provide a suitable event for the end of the period, but it was not the first Neoproterozoic glaciation, and it may not have been the last (Hambrey and Harland, 1985, Kaufman et al., 1997; see below). Within the Neoproterozoic Era, glacial epochs appear to have been broadly synchronous on a global scale. Like the

Early Neoproterozoic (Tonian) stratigraphy and prospects for a chronostratigraphic definition of the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic boundary

The stratigraphic interval just below Sturtian glaciogenic rocks appears to be chronostratigraphically distinctive. It is marked by positive C-isotopic profiles (+5 to +8‰) in sections from Namibia (Hoffman et al., 1998), arctic Canada (Asmerom et al., 1991, Kaufman and Knoll, 1995), Australia (Walter et al., 2000), and Spitsbergen [regardless of where one places Sturtian events relative to Akademikerbreen stratigraphy (Knoll et al., 1986)] and is particularly notable for the very low 87Sr/86Sr

Conclusions

We know how ancient artists succeeded in sculpting the sphinx. They did it not by simply joining a female torso to a cat's loins along a line, but rather by blending the two forms through a transition zone that highlighted the compatible features of both. That, I believe, is also our best way of joining the chronostratigraphic time scale of the Phanerozoic Eon to the geochronometric scale of Earth's earlier history. Neoproterozoic rocks contain a rich record of biological and environmental

Note added in proof

Brasier and colleagues have recently reported a U-Pb zircon date of 723+16/−10 Ma for a tuffaceous horizon within the Gubrah tillite, Oman. The Oman tillites are thought to correlate with Sturtian tillites elsewhere. Thus, if the age of 660+/−15 Ma holds for pre-Varager granites in the Ural Mountains, at least three ice ages occurred during the Neoproterozoic Era. [Brasier, M., McCarron, G., Tucker, R., Leather, J., Allen, P. and Shields, G. (2000) New U-Pb zircon dates for the Neoproterozoic

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Malcolm Walter, Nicholas Christie-Blick, Alan Jay Kaufman, and other members of the ICS Subcommission on the Terminal Proterozoic Period for stimulating discussions on Neoproterozoic stratigraphy, and M.A. Fedonkin, S. Grant, S. Kolosova, and the late Y. Zhang for photographic access to some of the fossils illustrated in this paper. Jim Gehling, Malcolm Walter, John Grotzinger, and Susannah Porter made helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This is a

References (120)

  • M.J. Hambrey et al.

    The late Proterozoic glacial era

    Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

    (1985)
  • S.B. Jacobsen et al.

    The Sr, C and O isotopic evolution of Neoproterozoic seawater

    Chem. Geol.

    (1999)
  • R.J.F. Jenkins

    The problems and potential of using animal fossils and trace fossils in terminal Proterozoic stratigraphy

    Precambrian Res.

    (1995)
  • A.J. Kaufman et al.

    Neoproterozoic variations in the C-isotopic composition of seawater: stratigraphic and biogeochemical implications

    Precambrian Res.

    (1995)
  • A.J. Kaufman et al.

    The Vendian record of Sr- and C- isotopic variations in seawater: implications for tectonics and paleoclimate

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1993)
  • H. Kimura et al.

    The Vendian–Cambrian δ13C record, North Iran: evidence for overturning of the ocean before the Cambrian explosion

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1997)
  • A.H. Knoll et al.

    Integrated approaches to terminal Proterozoic stratigraphy: an example from the Olenek Uplift, northeastern Siberia

    Precambrian Res.

    (1995)
  • R.H. Rainbird et al.

    U–Pb geochronology of Riphean sandstone and gabbro from southeast Siberia and its bearing on the Laurentia–Siberia connection

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1998)
  • V.N. Sergeev et al.

    Paleobiology of the Mesoproterozoic–Neoproterozoic transition: the Sukhaya Tunguska Formation, Turukhansk Uplift, Siberia

    Precambrian Res.

    (1997)
  • H. Strauss

    The sulfur isotopic record of Precambrian sulfates: new data and a critical evaluation of the existing record

    Precambrian Res.

    (1993)
  • M.M. Anderson et al.

    A review with descriptions of four unusual forms of the soft-bodied fauna of the Conception and St. John's groups (late Precambrian) Avalon Peninsula Newfoundland

    Proc. Third N. Am. Paleont. Conv.

    (1982)
  • A.P. Benus

    Sedimentological context of a deep-water Ediacaran fauna (Mistaken Point Formation Avalon Zone eastern Newfoundland)

    Trace Fossils Small Shelly Fossils and the Precambrian–Cambrian Boundary

    Bull. New York State Mus.

    (1988)
  • J. Bertrand-Sarfati et al.

    First Ediacaran fauna found in western Africa

    Geology

    (1995)
  • S.A. Bowring et al.

    A new look at evolutionary rates in deep time: uniting paleontology and high-precision geochronology

    GSA Today

    (1998)
  • S.A. Bowring et al.

    Calibrating rates of Early Cambrian evolution

    Science

    (1993)
  • M.D. Brasier et al.

    A billion years of environmental stability and the emergence of eukaryotes: new data from northern Australia

    Geology

    (1998)
  • M.D. Brasier et al.

    Integrated chemo- and biostratigraphic calibration of early animal evolution: Neoproterozoic–early Cambrian of southwest Mongolia

    Geol. Mag.

    (1996)
  • M.R. Brasier et al.

    Ediacaran sponge spicule clusters from southwestern Mongolia and the origins of the cambrian fauna

    Geology

    (1997)
  • M.B. Burzin

    Late Vendian (Neoproterozoic III) microbial and algal communities of the Russian Platform: models of facies-dependent distribution, evolution and reflection of basin development

    Rivista Ital. Paleontol. Stratigraf.

    (1996)
  • N.J. Butterfield et al.

    Diverse organic-walled fossils, including possible dinoflagellates, from the early Neoproterozoic of arctic Canada

    Geology

    (1998)
  • C.R. Calver et al.

    Ediacaran sequence and isotope stratigraphy of the officer Basin, South Australia

    Austral. J. Earth Sci.

    (1998)
  • M. Chen et al.

    Macrofossil biota from the upper Sinian Doushantuo Formation in eastern Yangtze Gorges

    Acta Palaeont. Sinica

    (1992)
  • P.E. Cloud et al.

    The Ediacaran Period and System

    Science

    (1982)
  • W. Compston et al.

    Zircon age evidence for the Late Precambrian Acraman ejecta blanket

    Austral. J. Earth Sci.

    (1987)
  • T.P. Crimes

    Changes in the trace fossil biota across the Proterozoic–Phanerozoic boundary

    Geol. Soc. London Q. J.

    (1992)
  • L. Ding et al.

    Sinian Maiohe Biota

    (1996)
  • P.A. DiBona

    A previously unrecognized Late Proterozoic succession: Upper Wilpena Group, northern Flinders Ranges, South Australia

    Geol. Surv. S. Aust., Q. Geol. Notes

    (1991)
  • M.A. Fedonkin

    Paleoichnology of the Vendian Metazoa

  • G.J.B. Germs

    New shelly fossils from Nama Group, South West Africa

    Am. J. Sci.

    (1972)
  • I.M. Gorokhov et al.

    Sr isotopic composition in Riphean, Vendian, and Lower Cambrian carbonates from Siberia

    Stratigr. Geol. Correl.

    (1995)
  • S.W.F. Grant

    Shell structure and distribution of Cloudina, a potential index fossil for the terminal Proterozoic

    Am. J. Sci.

    (1990)
  • Grey, K., 1998. Ediacaran palynology of Australia. PhD Thesis, Macquarie University,...
  • J.P. Grotzinger et al.

    Anomalous carbonate precipitates: is the Precambrian the key to the Permian?

    Palaios

    (1995)
  • J.P. Grotzinger et al.

    Biostratigraphic and geochronologic constraints on early animal evolution

    Science

    (1995)
  • J.P. Grotzinger et al.

    Diverse calcareous Fossils From the Ediacaran-Age (550–543 Ma) Nama Group, Namibia

    Geol. Soc. Am., Abstr. Progr.

    (1998)
  • W.B. Harland et al.

    A Geologic Time Scale 1989

    (1989)
  • H.J. Hofmann

    The mid-Proterozoic Little Dal macrobiota, Mackenzie Mountains, north-west Canada

    Palaeontology

    (1985)
  • Cited by (205)

    • Neoproterozoic Earth-life system

      2022, Precambrian Research
    • Advances in sediment geochemistry and chemostratigraphy for reservoir characterization

      2021, Energy Geoscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, the δ18O values between -1‰ and −14‰ are considered as slightly altered and values < -14‰ are considered as highly altered by diagenesis (Folling and Frimmel, 2002) (Fig. 4b, h). Sr isotopic concentrations in carbonates are highly susceptible to diagenetic alteration and thus increase the Sr isotopic ratios (Fig. 4c) in carbonates (Knoll, 2000). Carbonates affected by diagenesis show covariance and show more negative values (Fig. 4b) of O and C isotopes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text