Determination of the sequence and thicknesses of multilayers in an easel painting

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00484-XGet rights and content

Abstract

In this article we propose the application of an improved algorithm to determine the sequence and the thicknesses of paint multilayers. The concentration profiles of colour pigments are deduced using the PIXE technique for different proton energies on the AGLAE accelerator (LRMF, Le Louvre). As an example, this technique has been applied to an actual easel painting worked out at the Ecole du Louvre. The sequence of the paint layers was unknown to the experimentalists, but had been noted by the painter in the course of her work. The mathematical procedure and some results are presented, which are fully confirmed by the artist.

Introduction

In the framework of her studies in History of Art at the Ecole du Louvre, one of us (Guilló) [1] has worked out a painting designed to be used for testing various physical techniques of characterisation: it exhibits several features which are to be experimentally and non-destructively determined, such as underlying inscriptions, pentimenti, more or less thick layers of varnish, etc. Hence a succession of investigations using X-rays, infra-red or ultra-violet radiation,… have been performed at the Laboratoire de Recherche des Musées de France in the Palais du Louvre. When making her work, the painter had noted the stages of its achievement, and especially the order of the paint layers at a number of well defined locations.

Our team has already published several articles [2], [3] showing how PIXE analyses performed with protons of various energies allow one to determine the sequence of pigments in the paint matter, that is the succession of `elemental' paint layers, and, in a second stage, the concentration profiles of these pigments, i.e. the thicknesses of these layers. Pigment mixtures can be evidenced using the same techniques. In the present work, we have applied this method to determine the order and the thicknesses of the paint layers so as to confirm the validity of the mathematical techniques we have proposed. It is useless to stress the advantages which can be gained from the knowledge of these features: they are an important source of information about the artist’s technique. The results are complementary to those given by the classical methods used at the LRMF (see above).

Section snippets

Analysis of the elemental paints used by the artist

On the painting we have tried to define several unmixed colours used by the artist: red, blue, black, chestnut, yellow etc. Elemental analyses at low proton energy (1 MeV) have been performed at several selected points. This energy was low enough for the major elements in the surface layer to be the only detectable ones: owing to surface absorption, the elements in the underlying layers are far less visible. Table 1 and Fig. 1 show such a list of major elements which can be regarded as colour

Sequences of paint layers

We have measured the number of X-rays emitted by the elements detected in the material. The X-ray emission is induced by protons of variable energy Ep. A previous paper [2] has shown that the slope of the curve lnNx=f(Ep) is, after a correction which takes into account the atomic number of the considered element, an increasing function of the thickness of the material under which this element is located. In Ref. [2] we have established that the lower the proton energy used for the experiments

Determining the layer thicknesses

The concentration profile function C(x) can be resolved on a basis φi(x) asC(x)=iCiφi(x).In Eq. (1) this yieldsNx=iCi0σ(E)exp(−μx/cosθ)φi(x)dx.

So as to get easier computations, we choose for φi(x) Gaussian functions centered at various given depths. The widths of these Gaussians must be as small as possible, but not less than the distance between two consecutive ones. Through analyses performed with various proton energies Ej,m amplitudes Ci can be deduced from the measurement of Nj numbers

Discussion and conclusion

Using Table 1 and Fig. 3, we may consider that, at the point C, the colour sequence consists of chestnut, possibly mixed with black, on a yellow layer followed by a black one on the canvas. The proportion of black, marked by Fe only, seems to be weak as indicated by the ratio of the numbers of X-rays emitted by Fe and Mn. The Fe and Mn profiles are clearly somewhat distant from the surface: this suggests the presence of a slight surface layer of varnish which cannot be detected by PIXE and

Acknowledgements

We are most indebted to A. Roquebert, who proposed this collaboration, and to J.P. Mohen, who gave us the opportunity of using the AGLAE accelerator facility.

References (7)

  • G. Lagarde et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1997)
  • I. Brissaud et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1996)
  • P. Midy et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • PIXE analysis of historical paintings: Is the gain worth the risk?

    2015, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    Citation Excerpt :

    The comparison of the spectra allows to deduct the depth profiles of the paint layer stack. The theoretical grounds of this technique were early established [8] and tested on artificial paint layer sequences [9,10]. One of the first applications of differential PIXE to a historical painting was a dual energy study at 2 and 4 MeV of the “Christus und Maria Magdalena” attributed to Cranach the Elder (1515–1520) [11].

  • Concentration profiles in paint layers studied by differential PIXE

    2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    Citation Excerpt :

    Generally they are two methods of changing the irradiated depth: by tilting the sample with respect to the beam [1–3], which changes the projectile impact angle, and by varying the projectile energy [4–6]; for larger impact energies, projectiles penetrate deeper into the target. Depth–resolution measurements with PIXE have been performed on several materials: paint layers (studying their sequence and thickness) [7–11], glasses (measuring the weathering-depleted layer) [2] and metals (plating and surface enrichment of nobler metals) [12–18]. For most of applications, variation of the projectile energy was preferred to the tilting method, which requires precise mechanical adjustment [1]; it is also impractical for large objects like oil paintings.

  • 3D Micro-PIXE at atmospheric pressure: A new tool for the investigation of art and archaeological objects

    2007, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
  • Differential PIXE for investigating the layer structure of paintings

    2005, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
  • The differential PIXE set-up at the Van de Graaff laboratory in Florence

    2002, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Present address: CERAP, Université Paris I – Panthéon-Sorbonne, France.

View full text