Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology
Purification, kinetic studies, and homology model of Escherichia coli fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase
Introduction
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) catalyzes a control step in the gluconeogenic pathway, specifically, the hydrolysis of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6-P2) to fructose-6-phosphate (Fru-6-P) and Pi [1]. FBPases have been isolated from many sources including human liver, pig kidney, rabbit liver, beef liver, and Escherichia coli [2]. The investigation of their structure and function has led to a better understanding of their mechanism of action. The amino acid sequences of mammalian enzymes are 85% identical to each other. In addition, the amino acid sequence of the enzyme from E. coli is 42% identical and 55% similar to the sequence of the pig kidney enzyme, which implies a similar structure. FBPases are multimeric enzymes and in most cases are tetramers composed of four identical subunits [3], [4]. In previous studies, the E. coli enzyme at low concentrations was shown to be a tetramer by gel filtration [5].
Most FBPases exhibit Michaelis-Menten kinetics at physiological pH and require a divalent metal cation, such as Mg2+, for activity. For the mammalian enzymes the catalytic activity of FBPase is inhibited by AMP, which causes the enzyme to undergo a transition from a high-activity R (Relaxed) state to an inactive T (Tense) state [6]. For the mammalian enzymes, AMP inhibits cooperatively with a Hill coefficient near 2 [7], [8]; however, cooperative binding of AMP to E. coli FBPase has not been reported. Mammalian FBPases are also competitively inhibited by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2), with a Ki of 0.065 μM reported for the pig kidney enzyme [9]; however, previous studies on the E. coli enzyme showed varying results for this inhibitor. One study showed that Fru-2,6-P2 did not inhibit E. coli FBPase [5] while another reported that Fru-2,6-P2 was a competitive inhibitor [10]. E. coli FBPase has not been successfully purified to homogeneity, with previous characterization performed at an estimated purity level of only about 50% of total protein [5], [10], [11]. By cloning the E. coli fbp gene downstream from the strong T7 promoter on a high copy number plasmid we have over-expressed the enzyme. The higher expression levels have allowed the development of a new purification of E. coli FBPase from total protein to 98% purity. The quaternary structure and kinetic properties of this purified material were investigated and a homology model for the structure of the E. coli enzyme was constructed based upon the available three-dimensional structure of the pig kidney enzyme. The resulting model was analyzed in view of the kinetic properties determined for the E. coli enzyme as compared to those found for the pig kidney FBPase. Understanding the differences between the E. coli and pig kidney FBPase may help to elucidate the mechanism of the allosteric signal transmission in these FBPases.
Section snippets
Materials
Unless otherwise indicated, all components used in culture media, buffers and kinetic measurements were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Tris and enzyme-grade (NH4)2SO4 were from ICN Biomedicals. Yeast extract, tryptone and casamino acids were from Difco. AEBSF was from Calbiochem. The reagents for DNA sequencing, restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, T4 DNA polymerase, and T4 polynucleotide kinase were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech and New England Biolabs, and were used according to the
Results and discussion
The study of E. coli FBPase has been hindered by the inability to prepare the enzyme in pure form [5]. Contradictory kinetic properties of partially purified E. coli FBPase with purity levels of about 50% of total protein have been reported [5], [10]. In this investigation, a purification scheme for E. coli FBPase has been devised and a purity level as high as 98% has been attained. Also, a homology model was created in order to compare the E. coli FBPase to the pig kidney enzyme, the structure
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the American Diabetes Association.
References (37)
- et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(1981) - et al.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
(1983) - et al.
J. Mol. Biol.
(1994) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(1965) - et al.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(1984) - et al.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
(1966) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(1994) - et al.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
(1993) Anal. Biochem.
(1976)- et al.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
(1980)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Mol. Graph.
Cited by (25)
Cloning, purification and characterisation of cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from mung bean (Vigna radiata)
2021, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Interestingly, the data in Table S2 showed that the AMP Ki values of cFBPases from different plants are generally equivalent, at around 120 μM. By contrast, the FBPases for mammals had significantly lower Ki values (2.8–24 μM) (Daie, 1993; Dżugaj & Kochman, 1980; Gidh-Jain et al., 1994; Jang, Lee, Lee, & Hahn, 2003; Kelley, Giroux, Lu, & Kantrowitz, 1996; Kelley-Loughnane et al., 2002; Liu & Fromm, 1988; Ludwig et al., 2007; Opheim & Bernlohr, 1975). Sequence analysis showed that, compared with those in Hs-FBPase, the AMP binding site residues of cFBPases in the selected plants were poorly conserved (Fig. 1A), with only two (Lys115 and Tyr116) being identical out of eight residues.
An energetic reformulation of kinetic rate laws enables scalable parameter estimation for biochemical networks
2019, Journal of Theoretical BiologyStructures of Leishmania Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase Reveal Species-Specific Differences in the Mechanism of Allosteric Inhibition
2017, Journal of Molecular BiologyCitation Excerpt :The shorter side chain of Asn221 may explain the weaker substrate binding affinity of LmFBPase compared with mammalian FBPases affinity as Asn221 cannot make a direct hydrogen bond with the F16BP substrate (Fig. 6). Similar catalytic properties of E. coli FBPase, which has a corresponding asparagine in its active site [22], are consistent with this explanation. The three LmFBPase structures are compared with corresponding mammalian FBPase structures in Table 2.
Central cavity of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and the evolution of AMP/fructose 2,6-bisphosphate synergism in eukaryotic organisms
2014, Journal of Biological ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Loss of Mg2+ cooperativity may be due to the change in residue type (aspartate to glutamate) at position 68 (pFBPase numerology). The mutation Asp68 → Glu in pFBPase reduces Mg2+ cooperativity (46), and eFBPase has glutamate at position 68 with no Mg2+ cooperativity (52). All other Mg2+-binding residues are identical among the three wild-type FBPases under consideration here.
Thermus thermophilus encodes an archaeal-like fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase: Purification of native and recombinant protein for structural studies
2010, Protein Expression and Purification