Elsevier

Theriogenology

Volume 60, Issue 5, 15 September 2003, Pages 855-865
Theriogenology

Effects of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on ovarian follicular dynamics, synchrony of ovulation, and fertility in CIDR-based, fixed-time AI programs in beef heifers

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00091-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Estradiol cypionate (ECP) was used in beef heifers receiving a controlled internal drug release (CIDR; insertion=Day 0) device for fixed-time AI (FTAI) in four experiments. In Experiment 1, heifers (n=24) received 1 mg ECP or 1 mg ECP plus 50 mg commercial progesterone (CP) preparation i.m. on Day 0. Eight or 9 days later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers were allocated to receive 0.5 mg ECP i.m. concurrently (ECP0) or 24 h later (ECP24). There was no effect of treatment (P=0.6) on mean (±S.E.M.) day of follicular wave emergence (3.9±0.4 days). Interval from CIDR removal to ovulation was affected (P<0.05) only by duration of CIDR treatment (88.3±3.8 h versus 76.4±4.1 h; 8 days versus 9 days, respectively). In Experiment 2, 58 heifers received 100 mg progesterone and either 5 mg estradiol-17β or 1 mg ECP i.m. (E-17β and ECP groups, respectively) on Day 0. Seven (E-17β group) or 9 days (ECP group) later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers received ECP (as in Experiment 1) or 1 mg EB 24 h after CIDR removal, with FTAI 58–60 h after CIDR removal. Follicular wave emergence was later (P<0.02) and more variable (P<0.002) in heifers given ECP than in those given E-17β (4.1±0.4 days versus 3.3±0.1 days), but pregnancy rate was unaffected (overall, 69%; P=0.2). In Experiment 3, 30 heifers received a CIDR device and 5 mg E-17β, with or without 100 mg progesterone (P) i.m. on Day 0. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and heifers received ECP as described in Experiment 1 or no estradiol (Control). Intervals from CIDR removal to ovulation were shorter (P<0.05) in ECP0 (81.6±5.0 h) and ECP24 (86.4±3.5 h) groups than in the Control group (98.4±5.6 h). In Experiment 4, heifers (n=300) received a CIDR device, E-17β, P, and PGF (as in Experiment 3) and after CIDR removal were allocated to three groups (as in Experiment 2), with FTAI 54–56 h (ECP0) or 56–58 h (ECP24 and EB24) after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate did not differ among groups (overall, 63.6%, P=0.96). In summary, although 1 mg ECP (with or without progesterone) was less efficacious than 5 mg E-17β plus 100 mg progesterone for synchronizing follicular wave emergence, 0.5 mg ECP (at CIDR removal or 24 h later) induced a synchronous ovulation with an acceptable pregnancy rate to fixed-time AI.

Introduction

Estradiol-17β (E-17β) and estradiol benzoate (EB) are commonly used to synchronize follicular wave emergence [1], [2], [3], [4] and ovulation [5], [6], [7], [8] in controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-treated cattle. However, estradiol cypionate (ECP), an ester of estradiol with a low water solubility that delays its release from the site of injection, is the only estrogen ester licensed for use in cattle in North America. Plasma concentrations of estradiol were prolonged (98–170 h) after intramuscular administration of large doses (5–10 mg) of ECP [9], [10]. However, when ovariectomized beef heifers were treated with only 2 mg ECP, the duration of estrus (15.8±1.1 h) was not different from heifers with a spontaneous estrus [11], suggesting that reduced doses of ECP may be useful in estrus synchronization regimens.

The effects of ECP on ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation have been studied in lactating Holstein cows [12]. Although 1 mg ECP was more efficacious than 0.5 mg in synchronizing follicular wave emergence, the authors concluded that the prolonged half-life of ECP made it far less efficacious than E-17β for synchronizing both follicular wave emergence and ovulation in CIDR-treated dairy cattle. However, Lopes et al. [13] used ECP successfully to replace the second treatment with GnRH to synchronize ovulation for fixed-time AI (FTAI) in an Ovsynch-type program in dairy cattle. Furthermore, Ambrose et al. [14] reported that 0.5 mg ECP administered concurrently with CIDR removal synchronized ovulation in Holstein heifers that had received PGF 24 h before CIDR removal. To our knowledge, the use of ECP in comparison or combination with E-17β or EB for FTAI in beef cattle has not been reported.

Four experiments were designed to study and compare the effects of ECP (with or without injectable progesterone), E-17β, and EB on follicular dynamics, time of ovulation, and pregnancy rate to FTAI in CIDR-based protocols. In addition, the duration of CIDR treatment (8 days versus 9 days) on the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation was determined.

Section snippets

Experiment 1

Puberal, crossbred beef heifers 18–20 months of age (n=24), received a once used intravaginal progesterone releasing device (CIDR; Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ont., Canada) at random stages of the estrous cycle, and were randomly assigned to two groups to concurrently receive either 1 mg estradiol cypionate i.m. (ECP; Pharmacia Animal Health, Orangeville, Ont., Canada; n=13) or 1 mg ECP plus 50 mg commercial progesterone preparation (CP; Progesterone 5%®, J Webster Lab Inc., Victoriaville,

Experiment 1

Two heifers, one in each treatment group, did not respond to treatment to induce follicular wave emergence at CIDR insertion and they were excluded from the calculation of the interval from treatment to wave emergence. There was an effect of day (P<0.0001) on diameter of the regressing follicle, but the effects of treatment (P=0.17), and the treatment by day interaction (P=0.66) were not significant. Similarly, the effects of day (P=0.35), treatment (P=0.99) and the treatment by day interaction

Discussion

Although the administration of 1 mg ECP resulted in relatively synchronous follicular wave emergence in the present study, synchrony was less precise than with 5 mg E-17β; this is consistent with a previous study in which the administration of ECP to dairy cows resulted in relatively asynchronous follicular wave emergence [12]. In this regard, Bó et al. [16] reported delayed or asynchronous emergence of a new follicular wave when 5 mg EB (another estradiol ester) was administered. However,

Acknowledgements

Marcos Colazo was supported by FOMEC (Universidad de La Pampa, Argentina) and the University of Saskatchewan. The Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund, Strategic Research Program provided financial support. The authors thank Bioniche Animal Health for CIDR devices, Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, and Pharmacia Animal Health for Lutalyse. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Leonardo Brito, Dr. Cristal Deyo, Mr. Quinn Gavaga, Mr. Ken Piller (Neudorf, SK), Mr. William Kerr and the

References (28)

  • M.G. Colazo et al.

    Effects of dose and route of administration of cloprostenol on luteolysis, estrus, and ovulation in beef heifers

    Anim. Reprod. Sci.

    (2002)
  • G.A. et al.

    Follicular wave dynamics after estradiol 17β treatment of heifers with or without a progestogen implant

    Theriogenology

    (1994)
  • M.F. Martı́nez et al.

    Estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates in beef cattle given CIDR-B, prostaglandin and estradiol, or GnRH

    Can. Vet. J.

    (2000)
  • M.F. Martı́nez et al.

    Induction of follicular wave emergence for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in heifers

    Theriogenology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Sucrose Acetate Isobutyrate (SAIB) as a Delivery Vehicle for Estradiol and Sulpiride: Evaluation of Endocrine Responses in Geldings and Ovarian Response in Seasonally Anovulatory Mares

      2022, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most mares fail to have an ovarian response to estradiol-sulpiride if LH is not stimulated; however, a threshold LH concentration or critical time to LH stimulation has yet to be determined. Estradiol benzoate has been shown to stimulate an earlier LH rise than ECP in beef cows [17, 18]. Earlier stimulation of LH may promote an ovarian response in mares that might otherwise fail to respond.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text