Elsevier

Progress in Brain Research

Volume 157, 2006, Pages 111-122, 388-389
Progress in Brain Research

Cortical plasticity and rehabilitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)57007-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The brain is constantly adapting to environmental and endogenous changes (including injury) that occur at every stage of life. The mechanisms that regulate neural plasticity have been refined over millions of years. Motivation and sensory experience directly shape the rewiring that makes learning and neurological recovery possible. Guiding neural reorganization in a manner that facilitates recovery of function is a primary goal of neurological rehabilitation. As the rules that govern neural plasticity become better understood, it will be possible to manipulate the sensory and motor experience of patients to induce specific forms of plasticity. This review summarizes our current knowledge regarding factors that regulate cortical plasticity, illustrates specific forms of reorganization induced by control of each factor, and suggests how to exploit these factors for clinical benefit.

Section snippets

Factors that regulate plasticity

Plasticity is the remarkable ability of developing, adult, and aging brains to adapt to a changing world. This potential is revealed whenever an organism must meet a new environmental demand or recover from nervous system damage. Plasticity occurs in sensory and motor systems following deprivation of input or overstimulation, increased or decreased usage, learning of new skills, and injury. These experience-dependent changes can be as subtle as a change in neuronal excitability (Engineer et

Influence of background stimuli on plasticity

Psychologists and psychophysicists have known for decades that unattended background stimuli (context) influence perceptual learning. Studies of sensory plasticity have typically been conducted in environments stripped of context, by using soundproof booths or gray backgrounds. Recent experiments in more naturalistic and complex settings have shown that context also influences plasticity.

In many cases, adding complex backgrounds actually improves learning. Contrast discrimination learning, for

Sensory input paired with controlled release of neuromodulators

Pairing electrical activation of the cholinergic NB with different sounds generates changes in cortical map and RF properties in rats that closely parallel the different forms of plasticity resulting from operant training in monkeys. For example, temporally modulated stimuli tend to increase RF size, while stimuli that activate different regions of the receptor surface tend to decrease RF size (Kilgard et al., 2002). While the differential plasticity observed in operant studies could be

Clinical conclusions

It was proposed two decades ago that cortical reorganization after injury may be the neural substrate for recovery of function after brain damage (Jenkins and Merzenich, 1987). More recent studies in primates have shown that rehabilitative training can direct reorganization to benefit recovery (Nudo et al., 1996). There is no longer a doubt that reorganization after brain lesions is shaped by the sensorimotor experiences in the weeks to months following injury. Hence it is important to

Acknowledgments

We thank Cherie Percaccio, Amanda Puckett, Vikram Jakkamsetti, Dr. Owen Floddy and Dr. Pritesh Pandya for insightful comments and review of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, and Cure Autism Now.

References (81)

  • P.K. Pandya et al.

    Asynchronous inputs alter excitability, spike timing, and topography in primary auditory cortex

    Hear. Res.

    (2005)
  • B. Pleger et al.

    Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • K. Puurunen et al.

    Selegiline combined with enriched-environment housing attenuates spatial learning deficits following focal cerebral ischemia in rats

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2001)
  • M. Tsodyks

    Spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity — the long road towards understanding neuronal mechanisms of learning and memory

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • N.M. Weinberger

    The nucleus basalis and memory codes: auditory cortical plasticity and the induction of specific, associative behavioral memory

    Neurobiol. Learn Mem.

    (2003)
  • Y. Adini et al.

    Context-enabled learning in the human visual system

    Nature

    (2002)
  • M. Ahissar et al.

    Attentional control of early perceptual learning

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1993)
  • T. Allard et al.

    Reorganization of somatosensory area 3b representations in adult owl monkeys after digital syndactyly

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • S. Bao et al.

    Progressive degradation and subsequent refinement of acoustic representations in the adult auditory cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • J. Biernaskie et al.

    Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • T.S. Bjordahl et al.

    Induction of long-term receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the waking guinea pig by stimulation of the nucleus basalis

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • S. Bouret et al.

    Locus coeruleus activation modulates firing rate and temporal organization of odour-induced single-cell responses in rat piriform cortex

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • C. Breitenstein et al.

    D-amphetamine boosts language learning independent of its cardiovascular and motor arousing effects

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2004)
  • D.V. Buonomano et al.

    Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • Carrasco, R.A., Puckett, A., Pandya, P.K., McMenamy, A., Gibbons, J., Heydrick, C., Moucha, R., Jain, R. and Kilgard,...
  • E.F. Chang et al.

    Environmental noise retards auditory cortical development

    Science

    (2003)
  • M.E. Diamond et al.

    Experience-dependent plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1993)
  • M.A. Dimyan et al.

    Basal forebrain stimulation induces discriminative receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • H.R. Dinse et al.

    Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization

    Science

    (2003)
  • J. Dubnau et al.

    Neural substrates of memory: from synapse to system

    J. Neurobiol.

    (2003)
  • H. Ebbinghaus

    Uber das Gedachtnis. Untersuchungen zur Experimentellen Psychologie

    (1885)
  • T. Elbert et al.

    Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players

    Science

    (1995)
  • N.D. Engineer et al.

    Environmental enrichment improves response strength, threshold, selectivity, and latency of auditory cortex neurons

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2004)
  • D.M. Feeney et al.

    Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury

    Science

    (1982)
  • D. Genoux et al.

    Protein phosphatase 1 is a molecular constraint on learning and memory

    Nature

    (2002)
  • S. Glazewski et al.

    Experience-dependent depression of vibrissae responses in adolescent rat barrel cortex

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • B. Godde et al.

    Associative pairing of tactile stimulation induces somatosensory cortical reorganization in rats and humans

    Neuroreport.

    (1996)
  • J.M. Greuel et al.

    Pharmacological induction of use-dependent receptive field modifications in the visual cortex

    Science

    (1988)
  • F.C. Hummel et al.

    Drivers of brain plasticity

    Curr. Opin. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • W.M. Jenkins et al.

    Functional reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in adult owl monkeys after behaviorally controlled tactile stimulation

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Early Activation of Quadriceps With Pressure Biofeedback for the Prevention of Arthrogenic Muscle Inhibition Following Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Proof of Concept Clinical Trial

      2022, Journal of Chiropractic Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, the requirement of active attention brought about by the training may have helped reduce the cortical and neuromuscular changes caused due to AMI by improving the release of modulatory neurotransmitters. This is in line with literature that states that an individual should be attentively engaged, and the exercise performed should be meaningful for them to maximize neuroplasticity.23 Activity-dependent plasticity cannot be maximized with just repetitive exercises.

    • Neurofeedback facilitation of implicit motor learning

      2014, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Harnessing neuronal plasticity in order to modulate brain function or improve recovery is becoming a rapidly evolving and increasingly viable method in the neurosciences (Moucha & Kilgard, 2006).

    • Targeting plasticity with vagus nerve stimulation to treat neurological disease

      2013, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      These temporally restricted increases suggest that neuromodulatory release supports learning. Attention is known to facilitate behaviorally specific plasticity and learning (Moucha and Kilgard, 2006). Neuromodulatory systems are involved in attention, as disruption of the cholinergic or the noradrenergic systems impairs attentional processing (Muir et al., 1993, 1994).

    • Directing neural plasticity to understand and treat tinnitus

      2013, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      We demonstrated that NB-tone pairing also resulted in dramatic map reorganization in the secondary auditory cortex (Puckett et al., 2007). By pairing more complex stimuli with NB stimulation, we can enhance neural sensitivity, temporal processing, and frequency selectivity of A1 neurons (Kilgard and Merzenich, 1998b, 2002; Kilgard et al., 2001, 2002; Pandya et al., 2005; Moucha et al., 2005). For example, pairing NB stimulation with tones of multiple frequencies greatly improved frequency selectivity of A1 neurons (Kilgard et al., 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text