Modeling the minimally conscious state: measurements of brain function and therapeutic possibilities
Introduction
The recent definition of the minimally conscious state (MCS) challenges neurologists to improve the rational basis of evaluation and treatment of severely brain-injured patients (Giacino et al., 2002; Giacino, this volume). The ultimate impact of this nosological distinction is likely to rival the importance of the definition of the vegetative state (VS) by Jennett and Plum (1972; Jennett, this volume). Unlike VS, a condition characterized by the dissociation of behavioral unconsciousness and wakeful appearance, MCS classifies patients with unequivocal evidence of contingent response to their environment. The range of clinical phenotypes in MCS is quite large (see Giacino and Whyte, in press) and includes patients with relatively high-level behavioral responses such as complex command following or intelligible verbalizations. Detractors have raised ethical concerns that distinguishing MCS will lead to undervaluing the patients by leading to their conflation with VS (Burke, 2002; Coleman, 2002) and alternatively, futility concerns that there is no point to drawing further distinctions with the category of severe disability. The later concern is often expressed as a conclusion that this patient population is uniformly hopeless. To support the need for the MCS category and further refinement of the severe disability category of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Jennett and Bond, 1975), neurobiological models of VS and MCS are examined and contrasted below. The conceptual models are considered in light of new measurements of brain function in severely brain-injured patients. Despite a limited number of studies, significant differences in underlying brain function are already unfolding (cf. Kobylarz and Schiff, 2004; Laureys et al., 2004). These advances make diagnostic clarity an imperative in the evaluation of severe brain damage (Fins and Plum, 2004). Furthermore, the potential that specific measurements of brain function may provide a basis for selective therapeutic interventions in some severely disabled patients supports continued efforts to identify the different pathophysiological mechanisms arising in this context.
Akin to the dissociation of arousal and consciousness observed in VS, MCS dissociates the appearance of wakefulness and some level of responsiveness from a capacity to communicate and organize goal-directed behaviors. Models of MCS must therefore consider the neurobiological basis for supporting continuous interactive behaviors. Below, conceptual models of MCS are advanced and contrasted to current models of VS. Patients near the point of emergence from MCS, where late recoveries are sometimes identified, are proposed to primarily suffer failures of the initiation, maintenance, and completion of behavioral sets. Similar, but less profound impairments of general cognitive function are common across a spectrum of outcomes of severe brain injuries. Identifying and quantifying the necessary and sufficient conditions to emerge from MCS will require a neuroscientific framework that accounts for basic mechanisms underlying consciousness and cognition in the human brain. Thus, another motivation for detailed studies and models of MCS is this set of fundamental questions in neuroscience.
Section snippets
Nosology
Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the nosology of global disorders of consciousness following severe brain damage. The initial brain state produced by severe brain damage is coma. Coma is a state of unarousable unresponsiveness and reflects overwhelming functional impairment of the forebrain arousal mechanisms (Plum and Posner, 1982). Coma is typically a transient state that, if uncomplicated by intercurrent processes (e.g., infection, metabolic derangement), will resolve within 1 or 2
Models of the vegetative state
Before considering models of mechanisms underlying VS, it is useful to distinguish VS as a transient functional disturbance versus a permanent condition. VS often arises following an acute brain insult and can give way to significant further recovery. A wide range of outcomes, etiologies and structural injury patterns can be associated with transient VS. Similarly, the available literature of electrodiagnostic and functional imaging studies examining VS patients vary significantly with respect
Models of MCS
The diagnostic category of MCS canvasses a wider range of clinical phenotypes and structural pathologies than VS. At this time only a few studies have focused on patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for the condition and conceptual models must accordingly be seen as tentative. It is anticipated that as additional investigational studies are done this category will become further refined, hopefully based on mechanistic distinctions. Nonetheless, existing data provide evidence that brain
Possible therapeutic strategies
Spontaneous emergence late in the course of MCS indicates that some patients with non-progressive encephalopathies retain reserve capacities. The observations raise the question of how these capacities might be recruited in MCS patients and others with less severe cognitive disability. Recent efforts have begun to examine the effects of dopaminergic and other neuromodulators early in the course of treatment of MCS patients (Giacino, this volume). As discussed above, in some patients,
Implications and research directions
Why should we carefully study MCS patients and others with severe brain dysfunction? The most general answer is that it appears that functional disabilities may often exceed the obvious burden of structural brain injuries and that neuroimaging studies may show more distributed functional activation of cerebral networks than anticipated by the bedside examination. Further research efforts must focus on what these activations may mean, when the data present reasons to expect potential improvement
Acknowledgments
This paper was originally presented at The Satellite Symposium on Coma and Impaired Consciousness, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, June 24, 2004. The author thanks Dr. Steven Laureys, the Mind Science Foundation and the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, for the invitation to speak at this symposium and Dr. Joseph Fins and Andrew Hudson for comments on the manuscript. The support of the Charles A. Dana Foundation and the NIH-NINDS (NS02172, NS43451) are gratefully
References (114)
- et al.
Power spectra and coherence in the EEG of a vegetative patient with severe asymmetric brain damage
Clin. Neurophysiol.
(2000) - et al.
Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage
Lancet
(1975) - et al.
Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name
Lancet
(1972) The thalamic matrix and thalamocortical synchrony
Trends Neurosci.
(2001)- et al.
Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
Brain function in coma, vegetative state and related disorders
Lancet Neurol.
(2004) - et al.
Response from Menon, Owen and Pickard
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(1999) - et al.
Cortical processing in persistent vegetative state
Lancet
(1998)
Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data
Biophys. J.
Brain activity relating to the contingent negative variation: an fMRI investigation
NeuroImage
EEG coherency II: Experimental comparisons of multiple measures
Clin. Neurophys.
Predicting outcome in hypoxic-ischemic coma. A prospective clinical and electrophysiologic study
Electroen. Clin. Neuro.
Cortical processing in the vegetative state
Trends Cogn. Sci.
Neurophysiological and behavioral indices of time pressure effects on visuomotor task performance
Cognitive Brain Res.
Corticothalamic resonance, states of vigilance and mentation
Neuroscience
The neuropathology of the vegetative state after acute insult
Brain
The structural basis of moderate disability after traumatic brain damage
J. Neurol. Neurosur. Ps.
Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex
Annual Rev. Neurosci.
Emotion processing in the minimally conscious state
J. Neurol. Neurosur. Ps.
Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures
Obsessive compulsive disorder and traumatic brain injury: behavioral, cognitive, and neuroimaging findings
Neuropsy. Neuropsy. Be.
Paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia after brain injury
Arch. Neurol.
Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state
Arch. Neurol.
The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria
Neurology
Episodically remitting akinetic mutism following subarachnoid hemorrhage
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci.
Thalamocortical diaschisis: single-photon emission tomographic study of cortical blood flow changes after focal thalamic infarction
Neuropsy. Neuropsy. Be.
Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts: clinical and neuropathological study
Ann. Neurol.
Arousal from a semi-comatose state on zolpidem
S. Afr. Med. J.
The minimally conscious state
Neurology
Axonal recovery after severe traumatic brain injury demonstrated in vivo by 1 H MR spectroscopy
Neuroradiology
Brain glucose metabolism in postanoxic syndrome. Positron emission tomographic study
Arch. Neurol.
Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and the vegetative state: clinical and neuropathologic correlation
Neurology
Metabolic correlates of pallidal neuronal activity in Parkinson's disease
Brain
Constructing ethical stereotaxy for severe brain injury; balancing risks, benefits and access
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Neurological diagnosis is more than a state of mind: diagnostic clarity and impaired consciousness
Arch. Neurol.
Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention
Science
Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory
J. Neurophysiol.
The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria
Neurology
Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
The specificity of the ‘nonspecific’ midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei
Trends Neurosci.
Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Persistent vegetative state. Review and report of electrodiagnostic studies in eight cases
Arch. Neurol.
An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions
Neurosurgery
Destruction of the reticular core of the brainstem
Archives of Neurology
Sleep cycle in patients in a state of permanent unconsciousness
Brain Injury
The Vegetative State
Cited by (36)
A novel closed-loop EEG-tDCS approach to promote responsiveness of patients in minimally conscious state: A study protocol
2021, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :A major challenge in the application of tDCS to DOC patients is the variability in the underlying brain state of individuals, impacting their behavioural response. Indeed, DOC patients typically present fluctuations in vigilance impacting their responsiveness to external stimuli [3,24–28]. Piarulli and colleagues used spectral entropy as measured in resting EEG to highlight the periodicity of fluctuations and suggested that spectral entropy variability in MCS could mirror the aforementioned behavioural fluctuations.
Increased brain glucose metabolism in chronic severe traumatic brain injury as determined by longitudinal 18F-FDG PET/CT
2018, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Neurological manifestations of chronic severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can include severe motor deficits, sensory deficits, and disorders of consciousness, such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and a minimally conscious state [1–3].
Heart rate variability: An index of brain processing in vegetative state? An artificial intelligence, data mining study
2010, Clinical NeurophysiologyHow can we know if patients in coma, vegetative state or minimally conscious state are conscious?
2009, Progress in Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :The distinction between the stages is based on behavioural criteria. VS patients are generally thought to differ from comatose patients as coma patients can be aroused, yet they are believed to be equally unconscious (Schiff, 2005). MCS patients, however, are believed to have “some” or “fluctuating” consciousness.
The Use of Functional MRI in Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis and Treatment
2007, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Schiff and colleagues [5] published the first fMRI activation maps in two minimally conscious patients using language and sensory stimulation paradigms. They were interested in these domains of cognitive activity because evidence of residual functional skills in these domains would indicate potential communication avenues [12]. Their activation paradigms included recorded speech from an involved family member, digitally reversed speech, and passive tactile stimulation on both hands.