Elsevier

Progress in Brain Research

Volume 150, 2005, Pages 473-493, 609-610
Progress in Brain Research

Modeling the minimally conscious state: measurements of brain function and therapeutic possibilities

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50033-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The minimally conscious state (MCS) defines a functional level of recovery following severe brain injuries. Patients in MCS demonstrate unequivocal evidence of response to their environment yet fail to recover the ability to communicate. Drawing on recent functional brain-imaging studies, pathological data, and neurophysiological investigations, models of brain function in MCS are proposed. MCS models are compared and contrasted with models of the vegetative state (VS), a condition characterized by wakeful appearance and unconsciousness. VS reflects a total loss of cognitive function and failure to recover basic aspects of the normal physiologic brain state associated with wakefulness. MCS may represent a recovery of the minimal dynamic architecture required to organize behavioral sets and respond to sensory stimuli. Several pathophysiological mechanisms that might limit further recovery in MCS patients are considered. Implications for future research directions and possible therapeutic strategies are reviewed.

Introduction

The recent definition of the minimally conscious state (MCS) challenges neurologists to improve the rational basis of evaluation and treatment of severely brain-injured patients (Giacino et al., 2002; Giacino, this volume). The ultimate impact of this nosological distinction is likely to rival the importance of the definition of the vegetative state (VS) by Jennett and Plum (1972; Jennett, this volume). Unlike VS, a condition characterized by the dissociation of behavioral unconsciousness and wakeful appearance, MCS classifies patients with unequivocal evidence of contingent response to their environment. The range of clinical phenotypes in MCS is quite large (see Giacino and Whyte, in press) and includes patients with relatively high-level behavioral responses such as complex command following or intelligible verbalizations. Detractors have raised ethical concerns that distinguishing MCS will lead to undervaluing the patients by leading to their conflation with VS (Burke, 2002; Coleman, 2002) and alternatively, futility concerns that there is no point to drawing further distinctions with the category of severe disability. The later concern is often expressed as a conclusion that this patient population is uniformly hopeless. To support the need for the MCS category and further refinement of the severe disability category of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Jennett and Bond, 1975), neurobiological models of VS and MCS are examined and contrasted below. The conceptual models are considered in light of new measurements of brain function in severely brain-injured patients. Despite a limited number of studies, significant differences in underlying brain function are already unfolding (cf. Kobylarz and Schiff, 2004; Laureys et al., 2004). These advances make diagnostic clarity an imperative in the evaluation of severe brain damage (Fins and Plum, 2004). Furthermore, the potential that specific measurements of brain function may provide a basis for selective therapeutic interventions in some severely disabled patients supports continued efforts to identify the different pathophysiological mechanisms arising in this context.

Akin to the dissociation of arousal and consciousness observed in VS, MCS dissociates the appearance of wakefulness and some level of responsiveness from a capacity to communicate and organize goal-directed behaviors. Models of MCS must therefore consider the neurobiological basis for supporting continuous interactive behaviors. Below, conceptual models of MCS are advanced and contrasted to current models of VS. Patients near the point of emergence from MCS, where late recoveries are sometimes identified, are proposed to primarily suffer failures of the initiation, maintenance, and completion of behavioral sets. Similar, but less profound impairments of general cognitive function are common across a spectrum of outcomes of severe brain injuries. Identifying and quantifying the necessary and sufficient conditions to emerge from MCS will require a neuroscientific framework that accounts for basic mechanisms underlying consciousness and cognition in the human brain. Thus, another motivation for detailed studies and models of MCS is this set of fundamental questions in neuroscience.

Section snippets

Nosology

Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the nosology of global disorders of consciousness following severe brain damage. The initial brain state produced by severe brain damage is coma. Coma is a state of unarousable unresponsiveness and reflects overwhelming functional impairment of the forebrain arousal mechanisms (Plum and Posner, 1982). Coma is typically a transient state that, if uncomplicated by intercurrent processes (e.g., infection, metabolic derangement), will resolve within 1 or 2

Models of the vegetative state

Before considering models of mechanisms underlying VS, it is useful to distinguish VS as a transient functional disturbance versus a permanent condition. VS often arises following an acute brain insult and can give way to significant further recovery. A wide range of outcomes, etiologies and structural injury patterns can be associated with transient VS. Similarly, the available literature of electrodiagnostic and functional imaging studies examining VS patients vary significantly with respect

Models of MCS

The diagnostic category of MCS canvasses a wider range of clinical phenotypes and structural pathologies than VS. At this time only a few studies have focused on patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for the condition and conceptual models must accordingly be seen as tentative. It is anticipated that as additional investigational studies are done this category will become further refined, hopefully based on mechanistic distinctions. Nonetheless, existing data provide evidence that brain

Possible therapeutic strategies

Spontaneous emergence late in the course of MCS indicates that some patients with non-progressive encephalopathies retain reserve capacities. The observations raise the question of how these capacities might be recruited in MCS patients and others with less severe cognitive disability. Recent efforts have begun to examine the effects of dopaminergic and other neuromodulators early in the course of treatment of MCS patients (Giacino, this volume). As discussed above, in some patients,

Implications and research directions

Why should we carefully study MCS patients and others with severe brain dysfunction? The most general answer is that it appears that functional disabilities may often exceed the obvious burden of structural brain injuries and that neuroimaging studies may show more distributed functional activation of cerebral networks than anticipated by the bedside examination. Further research efforts must focus on what these activations may mean, when the data present reasons to expect potential improvement

Acknowledgments

This paper was originally presented at The Satellite Symposium on Coma and Impaired Consciousness, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, June 24, 2004. The author thanks Dr. Steven Laureys, the Mind Science Foundation and the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, for the invitation to speak at this symposium and Dr. Joseph Fins and Andrew Hudson for comments on the manuscript. The support of the Charles A. Dana Foundation and the NIH-NINDS (NS02172, NS43451) are gratefully

References (114)

  • P.P. Mitra et al.

    Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data

    Biophys. J.

    (1999)
  • Y. Nagai et al.

    Brain activity relating to the contingent negative variation: an fMRI investigation

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • P.L. Nunez et al.

    EEG coherency II: Experimental comparisons of multiple measures

    Clin. Neurophys.

    (1999)
  • T.L. Rothstein et al.

    Predicting outcome in hypoxic-ischemic coma. A prospective clinical and electrophysiologic study

    Electroen. Clin. Neuro.

    (1991)
  • N.D. Schiff et al.

    Cortical processing in the vegetative state

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (1999)
  • S.M. Slobounov et al.

    Neurophysiological and behavioral indices of time pressure effects on visuomotor task performance

    Cognitive Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • M. Steriade

    Corticothalamic resonance, states of vigilance and mentation

    Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • J.H. Adams et al.

    The neuropathology of the vegetative state after acute insult

    Brain

    (2000)
  • J.H. Adams et al.

    The structural basis of moderate disability after traumatic brain damage

    J. Neurol. Neurosur. Ps.

    (2001)
  • R. Andersen

    Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex

    Annual Rev. Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • T. Bekinschtein et al.

    Emotion processing in the minimally conscious state

    J. Neurol. Neurosur. Ps.

    (2004)
  • J.S. Bendat et al.

    Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures

    (2000)
  • M.L. Berthier et al.

    Obsessive compulsive disorder and traumatic brain injury: behavioral, cognitive, and neuroimaging findings

    Neuropsy. Neuropsy. Be.

    (2001)
  • J.A. Blackman et al.

    Paroxysmal autonomic instability with dystonia after brain injury

    Arch. Neurol.

    (2004)
  • M. Boly et al.

    Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state

    Arch. Neurol.

    (2004)
  • Boly M., et al. Faymonville, M. E., Peigneux, P., Lambermont, B., Damas, P., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., Franck, G.,...
  • W.J. Burke

    The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • J.W. Burruss et al.

    Episodically remitting akinetic mutism following subarachnoid hemorrhage

    J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • R.J. Caselli et al.

    Thalamocortical diaschisis: single-photon emission tomographic study of cortical blood flow changes after focal thalamic infarction

    Neuropsy. Neuropsy. Be.

    (1991)
  • P. Castaigne et al.

    Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts: clinical and neuropathological study

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1981)
  • R.P. Clauss et al.

    Arousal from a semi-comatose state on zolpidem

    S. Afr. Med. J.

    (2001)
  • D. Coleman

    The minimally conscious state

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • E.R. Danielsen et al.

    Axonal recovery after severe traumatic brain injury demonstrated in vivo by 1 H MR spectroscopy

    Neuroradiology

    (2003)
  • A.G. DeVolder et al.

    Brain glucose metabolism in postanoxic syndrome. Positron emission tomographic study

    Arch. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • J.H. Dougherty et al.

    Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and the vegetative state: clinical and neuropathologic correlation

    Neurology

    (1981)
  • D. Eidelberg et al.

    Metabolic correlates of pallidal neuronal activity in Parkinson's disease

    Brain

    (1997)
  • J.J. Fins

    Constructing ethical stereotaxy for severe brain injury; balancing risks, benefits and access

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • J.J. Fins et al.

    Neurological diagnosis is more than a state of mind: diagnostic clarity and impaired consciousness

    Arch. Neurol.

    (2004)
  • P. Fries et al.

    Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention

    Science

    (2001)
  • J.M. Fuster

    Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1973)
  • Giacino, J.T. and Whyte, J. (2005). The vegetative state and minimally conscious state: current knowledge and remaining...
  • J.T. Giacino et al.

    The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria

    Neurology

    (2002)
  • L. Gold et al.

    Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2002)
  • H. Groenewegen et al.

    The specificity of the ‘nonspecific’ midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei

    Trends Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • D.A. Gusnard et al.

    Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • P.L. Hansotia

    Persistent vegetative state. Review and report of electrodiagnostic studies in eight cases

    Arch. Neurol.

    (1985)
  • J. Hirsch et al.

    An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions

    Neurosurgery

    (2000)
  • D.H. Ingvar et al.

    Destruction of the reticular core of the brainstem

    Archives of Neurology

    (1970)
  • M. Isono et al.

    Sleep cycle in patients in a state of permanent unconsciousness

    Brain Injury

    (2002)
  • B. Jennett

    The Vegetative State

    (2002)
  • Cited by (36)

    • A novel closed-loop EEG-tDCS approach to promote responsiveness of patients in minimally conscious state: A study protocol

      2021, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A major challenge in the application of tDCS to DOC patients is the variability in the underlying brain state of individuals, impacting their behavioural response. Indeed, DOC patients typically present fluctuations in vigilance impacting their responsiveness to external stimuli [3,24–28]. Piarulli and colleagues used spectral entropy as measured in resting EEG to highlight the periodicity of fluctuations and suggested that spectral entropy variability in MCS could mirror the aforementioned behavioural fluctuations.

    • Increased brain glucose metabolism in chronic severe traumatic brain injury as determined by longitudinal 18F-FDG PET/CT

      2018, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Neurological manifestations of chronic severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can include severe motor deficits, sensory deficits, and disorders of consciousness, such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and a minimally conscious state [1–3].

    • How can we know if patients in coma, vegetative state or minimally conscious state are conscious?

      2009, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The distinction between the stages is based on behavioural criteria. VS patients are generally thought to differ from comatose patients as coma patients can be aroused, yet they are believed to be equally unconscious (Schiff, 2005). MCS patients, however, are believed to have “some” or “fluctuating” consciousness.

    • The Use of Functional MRI in Traumatic Brain Injury Diagnosis and Treatment

      2007, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Schiff and colleagues [5] published the first fMRI activation maps in two minimally conscious patients using language and sensory stimulation paradigms. They were interested in these domains of cognitive activity because evidence of residual functional skills in these domains would indicate potential communication avenues [12]. Their activation paradigms included recorded speech from an involved family member, digitally reversed speech, and passive tactile stimulation on both hands.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text