Induction of enhanced CH4 oxidation in soils: NH4+ inhibition patterns
Introduction
The most poorly understood factor affecting microbial CH4 oxidation in soils is the NH4+ concentration in the soil. Most studies, especially at atmospheric CH4 concentrations, show that NH4+ inhibits CH4 oxidation, e.g. in the case of NH4+ fertilizer application (Hütsch et al., 1993). Some studies, on the other hand, indicate that when NH4+ is added to soils exposed to high CH4 concentrations, it can stimulate CH4 oxidation (Bender and Conrad, 1995, Boeckx et al., 1996, Bodelier et al., 2000). Little is known about the cause of these differences.
King and Schnell, 1994a, King and Schnell, 1994b found that the inhibitory effect of NH4+ on CH4 oxidation increased with increasing CH4 concentrations, and attributed the effect to NO2− formation. However, increasing the CH4 concentration decreased the NO2− formation in experiments of Dunfield and Knowles (1995). Gulledge and Schimel (1998) concluded that the increasing inhibition effect of CH4 oxidation with increasing CH4 concentration observed by King and Schnell, 1994a, King and Schnell, 1994b was due to Cl−, the counter-ion of NH4+ in their study. Whalen (2000) also attributed NH4Cl inhibition effects to Cl−. Still, the increasing inhibition effect with increasing CH4 concentration has been observed with (NH4)2SO4 as well (King and Schnell, 1998). All of these studies were performed with soils that were adapted to atmospheric CH4 concentrations.
Exposure of soils to high CH4 mixing ratios alters the microbial ecology of soils considerably. De Visscher et al., 1999, De Visscher et al., 2001 found that NH4+ tended to stimulate CH4 oxidation when it was added after a brief exposure (about 1 week) of the soil to high CH4 concentrations, but tended to inhibit CH4 oxidation when added after a long exposure (>1 month) to high CH4 concentrations. Since these studies were performed with NH4Cl, Cl− cannot be ruled out as a potential influencing factor.
Issues on the effect of NH4+ on CH4 oxidation in landfill cover soils are of practical importance because of the growing interest in engineered landfill cover materials, like compost-amended soils, which contain high inorganic N concentrations (Humer and Lechner, 1999).
Some of the issues raised above might be resolved if it can be assumed that inhibition patterns change over time. Therefore, our aim was to investigate how the ability of soils to oxidize CH4 develops while it is exposed to high CH4 mixing ratios, and how the response to NH4+ and Cl− evolves during this development.
Section snippets
Soil characteristics and soil handling
The soil used in this study was the same as that used by De Visscher et al. (2001), but it had been stored air-dry for about 2 y before use. It originates from the cover of a landfill near Antwerp, Belgium. The soil properties were: 60% sand; 31.6% silt; 8.4% clay (sandy loam according to USDA classification); 1.7% C; soil pHH2O 6.6. One week after rewetting the soil to 140 g H2O kg−1 air-dry soil, three incubation columns were filled up with a 50 cm layer of soil. The columns were Plexiglas
Moisture content
Fig. 1 shows the moisture content of the soil samples from the three incubation cylinders, as a function of sampling time. The moisture contents stay fairly constant for about 2 months. After day 60 the moisture contents differed considerably. This might have been the result of a drying front (at 1% CH4) or a wetting front (at 10% CH4) moving up the column. That would mean that the condition of the soil was not homogeneous throughout the column. In principle, changes of the microbial ecology
Methanotrophic activity
The methanotrophic activity declined considerably when the inorganic N content reached a steady state, indicating that the activity decline was a response to N shortage. Later on the methanotrophic activity was uncoupled from the N transformations in the soil: it increased in spite of the low inorganic N content of the soil. Thus two phases can be distinguished: first a phase of soil-N-dependent methanotrophic activity comprising the first peak and the steady state, and then a phase of
Acknowledgements
Eric Gillis and Danny Pauwels are acknowledged for their contributions to the analyses.
References (20)
- et al.
Effect of CH4 concentrations and soil conditions on the induction of CH4 oxidation activity
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1995) - et al.
Methane emission from a landfill and the methane oxidising capacity of its covering soil
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1996) - et al.
Different NH4+-inhibition patterns of soil CH4 consumption: a result of different CH4-oxidizer populations across sites?
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1997) - et al.
Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane oxidation in soil of the Broadbalk wheat experiment
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
(1993) - et al.
Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots
Nature
(2000) - et al.
Revised taxonomy of the methanotrophs: description of Methylobacter gen. nov., emendation of Methylococcus, validation of Methylosinus and Methylocystis species, and a proposal that the family Methylococcaceae includes only the group I methanotrophs
International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
(1993) - et al.
Methane oxidation in simulated landfill cover soil environments
Environmental Science and Technology
(1999) - et al.
Short-term kinetic response of enhanced methane oxidation to environmental factors
Biology and Fertility of Soils
(2001) - et al.
Kinetics of inhibition of methane oxidation by nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium in a humisol
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
(1995) - et al.
Factors affecting competition between type I and type II methanotrophs in two-organism, continuous-flow reactors
Microbial Ecology
(1993)
Cited by (61)
Greenhouse gas emissions of sewage sludge land application in urban green space: A field experiment in a Bermuda grassland
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentEnhanced carbon sinks following double-rice conversion to green manure-rice cropping rotation systems under optimized nitrogen fertilization in southeast China
2024, Agriculture, Ecosystems and EnvironmentIn-situ removal of odorous NH<inf>3</inf> and H<inf>2</inf>S by loess modified with biologically stabilized leachate
2022, Journal of Environmental ManagementResponses of CH<inf>4</inf> flux and microbial diversity to changes in rainfall amount and frequencies in a wet meadow in the Tibetan Plateau
2021, CatenaCitation Excerpt :An increase in temperature (5.5–22.7 °C) accelerates the rate of oxygen consumption in the soil and thus decreases the redox potential in soil, which is beneficial to the generation of methanogens and may increase CH4 production and then potentially increase CH4 emission flux (Das and Adhya, 2012). Soil ammonium nitrogen content also affects methane monooxygenase inhibition of CH4 oxidation (De Visscher and Cleemput, 2003; Li et al., 2015). The weak positive correlation we observed between CH4 flux and NH4+ supports this effect of ammonium nitrogen content on CH4 oxidation.
Opposite responses of global warming potential to ammonium and nitrate addition in an alpine steppe soil from Northern Tibet
2020, Global Ecology and ConservationRice rhizodeposits affect organic matter priming in paddy soil: The role of N fertilization and plant growth for enzyme activities, CO<inf>2</inf> and CH<inf>4</inf> emissions
2018, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :Previous studies reported that N fertilization stimulated methanotrophic bacteria and increased CH4 uptake in soil (Prasanna et al., 2002; Shrestha et al., 2010). De Visscher and Van Cleemput (2003) reported that NH4+ could stimulate CH4 oxidation at high CH4 concentrations; this might imply that N fertilization could ultimately reduce CH4 production and emission in paddy soil. CH4 production is also affected by the presence of electron acceptors (Megonigal et al., 2004; Jungkunst and Fiedler, 2007).