Analysis of topographic and climatic control on rainfall-triggered shallow landsliding using a quasi-dynamic wetness index
Introduction
Landsliding associated to rainstorms is a major process of landscape evolution on steep hillslopes. The trigger mechanism for most of these shallow slope failures is the rapid buildup of pore water pressure above a hydrologic impeding layer in the trough of geomorphic hollows. Once the hollows fail as shallow debris slides, debris avalanches, or debris flows, they gradually fill in by localised sloughing around the headwall, soil creep, weathering of exposed bedrock or till, surface erosion, and recruitment of organic debris (Dietrich and Dunne, 1978, Benda and Dunne, 1997). The periodicity of evacuation of these hollows depends on the long-terms rates of infilling and the timing of episodic storms as well as the effects of vegetation removal.
Shallow landsliding is important not only as a geomorphological process, but also as a cause of natural hazards. The resultant need to predict landslide occurrence at landscape scales has led to the development of numerous stochastic/statistic and process-based models, with increasing emphasis on the use of GIS in the past 10 years. Statistical models rely on statistical correlation between landslide frequency and factors such as slope, lithology, and geologic structure (Pike, 1988, Carrara et al., 1991). The process-based landscape models have generally used some variation on the factor of safety equation (Selby, 1985, p. 228) coupled with geomorphic, hydrological, geological, and vegetation data to estimate slope, slope shape, cohesion, and subsurface flow characteristics (Okimura and Kawatani, 1986, van Asch et al., 1993, Montgomery and Dietrich, 1994, Miller, 1995, Wu and Sidle, 1995, Wu and Sidle, 1997, Van Westen and Terlien, 1996, Pack and Tarboton, 1997, Borga et al., 1998, Iida, 1999, Montgomery et al., 2000, Borga et al., 2002).
Dietrich et al., 1992, Montgomery and Dietrich, 1994 developed a simple physically based model (steady-state model, hereafter), based on digital terrain data, which couples a shallow saturated subsurface model with an infinite slope stability model. The steady-state model incorporates a scheme based on the formulation proposed by O'Loughlin (1986) to simulate the topographic dependence of runoff generation during transient storm events in humid environments. Based on this approach, maps of equilibrium soil saturation are generated from the analysis of the upslope contributing areas, soil transmissivity, and local slope. This hydrologic model thus reduces to a calculation of the ratio of local flux at a given rainfall to that at soil profile saturation. The utilisation of the O'Loughlin model relies upon two key assumptions: the existence of steady-state conditions; and that total potential is dominated by the elevation (topography) potential.
Simplified approaches such as the steady-state model are well suited to portray the topographic control of hydrology on shallow landsliding. However, the problem of predicting susceptibility to shallow landsliding at the landscape scale is complicated by the interaction between static and dynamic environmental factors. While topographic control of the near-surface hydrologic response can be treated as a static factor in slope stability models, relevant dynamic factors include variability of rainfall intensity and duration as well as spatial and temporal variation in the species, age, and density of vegetation.
Dynamic models of the hydrological response at the watershed scale have been developed to account for variability in both rainfall input and vegetation. Wu and Sidle, 1995, Wu and Sidle, 1997 developed and tested a dynamic, distributed, physically based slope stability model (dSLAM). The dSLAM model combines an infinite slope model, a kinematic wave groundwater model, and continuous change model for vegetation root cohesion and surcharge. In the application of dSLAM model to steep forested terrain, it is assumed that the infiltration capacity of the soil is always greater than rainfall intensity, thus only subsurface flow and non-Hortonian overland flow is simulated. Explicit routing models such as the dSLAM, are generally applied over areas where sufficient information on the spatial variability of the topographic and soil parameters that control water movement are available. The need for generalising from intensely studied sites to broader landscapes with sparse data sets presents a problem for these explicit routing approaches. There is a need therefore to develop a methodology which is able to cope with dynamic factor as the variability of rainfall intensity and duration and yet maintains the simplicity of the index approach.
In this paper, we first analyse the implications of using the steady-state assumptions incorporated into the steady-state shallow failure model and show how this assumption may be relaxed by using a quasi-dynamic wetness index, introduced by Barling et al. (1994). It is then shown how the quasi-dynamic wetness index may be derived from the kinematic wave model for subsurface flow. This shows the linkages between the index-based approach to slope stability analysis and the modelling approach based on the dynamic simulation of landscape response to storms. The quasi-dynamic subsurface runoff model is coupled with the local intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) rainfall equation and with an infinite slope, Coulomb failure model which assumes that the soil is cohesionless at failure to predict duration and frequency of the rainfall necessary for landslide initiation to occur across the catchment. The model is designed to incorporate the spatial variability of IDF relationship across the landscape, thus allowing for the inclusion of climatic control (further than topographic control) on shallow landsliding analysis. The model is applied and tested in the Rio Cordon basin (5 km2), a mountainous catchment in the Dolomites where field surveys provide a description of hydraulic and geotechnical properties of soils and an inventory of landslide scars is available. A methodology for the intercomparison of slope stability index models is introduced and a comparison with the results provided by the steady-state model is described.
Section snippets
The quasi-dynamic wetness index for predicting depth of saturated subsurface flow
Topographic indices such as the steady-state wetness index of O'Loughlin (1986) have been widely applied in hydrology. These topographic indices were originally developed to predict zones of surface saturation but these indices have also been used to predict patterns of soil moisture and saturation deficit (Bardossy and Lehmann, 1998, Western et al., 1999). The steady-state assumption incorporated in the hydrologic model developed by O'Loughlin (1986) implies that the specific upslope area is a
The coupled hydrologic and slope stability model
The subsurface flow model is coupled with a planar infinite slope, Coulomb failure model of a cohesionless soil of constant thickness and slope to identify unstable topographic elements, in a way which is conceptually similar to that proposed by Montgomery and Dietrich (1994). We will assume here that (1) the entire soil profile is initially wet to field capacity and (2) the recharge rate equals the rainfall rate. With the latter assumption we neglect the vertical transport processes taking
Application and discussion
The Rio Cordon catchment in the Eastern Italian Alps (Fig. 1) was chosen as a study area for three reasons: (i) the basin is fairly representative of lithological and physiographical conditions frequently observed in headwater areas in the Dolomites; (ii) landslides in the area have been extensively mapped since 1992; and (iii) Borga et al., 1998, Borga et al., 2002 have shown that subsurface flow is important for landslide development in the area, which suggests that this is a site where a
Assessment of model results
The model reliability was assessed by overlying the digitised landslide map onto the map of predicted recurrence interval of critical rainfall necessary for slope instability and by comparing the resulting patterns. Two types of error can be identified in this way: (1) a site is predicted by the model as unstable or characterised by short recurrence interval of critical rainfall, but no scars were observed on it; (2) a site is predicted as stable or characterised by longer recurrence interval
Conclusions and future research recommendations
In this paper, a distributed, physically based slope stability model for shallow landsliding is presented. The model uses a ‘quasi-dynamic’ wetness index to predict the spatial distribution of soil saturation in response to a rainfall of specified duration, and allows to account for both topographic and climatic control on slope failure. Results from the model application in a steep basin in the Eastern Italian Alps show that the model provides a surrogate for failure initiation probability as
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to K. Beven, A. Bronstert, F. Guzzetti and D. Montgomery for helpful discussions. Thanks to D. Tarboton for useful review and for suggestions on the model testing procedure. The review comments by D. Miller and by T. van Asch helped improve the presentation. S. Grisotto and E. Frank provided critical support during the field work and the preparation of the numerical code. The ARPAV—Centro Sperimentale Valanghe of Veneto Region is acknowledged for the collaboration in
References (43)
- et al.
Spatial distribution of soil moisture in a small catchment. 1. Geostatistical analysis
J. Hydrol.
(1998) A stochastic hydro-geomorphological model for shallow landsliding due to rainstorms
Catena
(1999)- et al.
Experimental studies on the effects of pipeflow on througflow partitioning
J. Hydrol.
(1995) - et al.
An information system for large scale quantitative hazard analysis of landslides
Z. Geomorphol.
(1993) - et al.
A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterising the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and soil water content
Water Resour. Res.
(1994) - et al.
Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow
Water Resour. Res.
(1997) Kinematic subsurface stormflow
Water Resour. Res.
(1981)- et al.
A dynamic TOPMODEL
Hydrol. Process.
(2001) - et al.
Shallow landslide hazard assessment using a physically based model and digital elevation data
Environ. Geol.
(1998) - et al.
Assessment of shallow landsliding by using a physically based model of hillslope stability
Hydrol. Process.
(2002)
The rainfall intensity–duration control of shallow landslides and debris flow
Geograf. Ann., Series A
GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard
Earth Surf. Process. Landforms
Drainage of groundwater resting on a sloping bed
Water Resour. Res.
Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain
Zeit. für Geomorph.
Channelization thresholds and land surface morphology
Geology
A process-based model for coluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data
Hydrol. Process.
Topographic control on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchments
Hydrol. Process.
Statistical methods in water resources
Hydrology–geomorphology conceptual model for the prediction of saturation area
Eos Trans. AGU
Landslide triggering by rain infiltration
Water Resour. Res.
Cited by (127)
Modeling windthrow effects on water runoff and hillslope stability in a mountain catchment affected by the VAIA storm
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentEvaluating the interaction between snowmelt runoff and road in the occurrence of hillslope instabilities affecting a landslide-prone mountain basin: A multi-modeling approach
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :Road width was measured equal to 4 m and the relative road cut depth, describing the potential interception of each road cell at the foot of the upstream slope, was set equal to the default value of 0.5 m. According to on-field measurements previously conducted in the same area (Borga et al., 2002b; Borga et al., 2005; Tarolli et al., 2008; Tarolli et al., 2011), geotechnical parameters were set looking at the respective average values detected across the catchment. Therefore, soil depth was set equal to 0.5 m, the internal friction angle (ϕ) to 35°, the saturated soil density (ρs) to 1800 kgm−3, soil transmissivity (T) to 0.3·10-3 m2s−1 and soil cohesion (Cohs) to 0.1 kg·m-1s−2 Additionally, water density (ρw) was 1000 kgm−3, while root cohesion (Cohr) and vegetation surcharge (W) were set equal to 0, because of the mere presence of low herbaceous cover among the watershed (Kokutse et al., 2016; Fig. 3Ciii).
Modeling shallow landslides and root reinforcement: A review
2022, Ecological EngineeringA multidisciplinary approach of landslide characterization: A case of the Siwalik zone of Nepal Himalaya
2021, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences: X