Technical NoteInfluence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution
Introduction
Bone in healthy subjects adapts to its mechanical environment (Wolff, 1892). In some patients with endoprosthetic joint replacements or fracture fixation devices, local strains and stresses may exceed biological limits (Frost, 1964; Cowin and Hart, 1985), leading to bone resorption or remodeling and possible implant loosening (Harrigan et al., 1996; van Rietbergen et al., 1997). Various mathematical methods have been employed to describe these adaptation processes (Weinans et al., 1992; Turner et al., 1997). Thus, in order to achieve the physiological relevance of such simulations, it is essential to utilize realistic strain distributions which correlate to those reported from in vivo measurements (Lanyon and Smith, 1969; Cochran, 1972; Brennwald and Perren, 1974; Lanyon, 1976; Schatzker et al., 1980; Carter et al., 1981; Weinans et al., 1992).
In most finite element analyses of the human femur, the physiological loading is approximated using the abductor muscles and the ilio-tibial band (Rybicki et al., 1972; Crowninshield et al., 1980; Huiskes et al., 1987; Huiskes, 1990; Merz et al., 1992; Lu et al., 1996). The particular importance of the ilio-tibial tract and the abductors to the femoral loading condition were described by Pauwels (1951)and later confirmed in a continuum mechanics’ approach (Rohlmann et al., 1980, Rohlmann et al., 1982). Given the relative contribution of muscle activity to the loading situation (Finlay et al., 1991; Duda et al., 1997) it may be important to consider muscle activity other than the abductors and ilio-tibial band (Taylor et al., 1996). To the authors’ knowledge, no study has used a complete and balanced set of thigh muscle and joint contact loads to approximate a more comprehensive loading situation in the femur.
Thus, the goal of this study was to determine the strain distribution during gait based on a loading situation including all thigh muscles, to compare the resulting strain distributions with those obtained using simplified load regimes and to determine which muscle forces should be included in analytical investigations in order to appropriately simulate the loading conditions for the proximal femur with maximal physiological relevance.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The finite element model was constructed from the endosteal and periosteal contours of the Standardized Femur obtained from successive CT scans (Cristofolini et al., 1996)1. A standard femur
Results
The comparison between linear and quadratic displacement functions revealed a maximal strain difference of 6%, leading to the assumption that the linear element model was sufficient to calculate the strain distribution in the bone.
The overall magnitude of the principal strains never exceeded 2000 με in the femur loaded with all thigh muscles, whereas strain values of close to 3000 με were computed under simplified load regimes (Fig. 3). Virtually no differences in strain orientation and
Discussion
A finite element model of a standardized human femur was developed allowing a comparison of the strain distribution under various load regimes. Even though the muscle and joint contact loads used represent only a rough approximation of the in vivo situation, this analysis unveils the large influence of the thigh loading on the strain distribution commonly used as bases to bone modeling and remodeling analyses. The bone loaded with all thigh muscles experienced a more or less homogeneous strain
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. R. Brand, Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, The University of Iowa for providing the anatomical and muscle force data and Dr. M. Viceconti, Laboratory for Biomaterials Technology of Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli for providing the femoral contour data. Thanks to Dr. K. Wenger, Department of Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, University of Ulm and Dr. M. Knothe Tate, AO Forschungsinstitut, Davos for editing.
References (40)
- et al.
A model of lower extremity muscular anatomy
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
(1982) - et al.
The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiological cross-sectional area
Journal of Biomechanics
(1986) - et al.
In-vivo-Messungen der belastungsabhängigen Knochendehnung
Helvetica Chirurgica Acta
(1974) - et al.
Stress fields in the unplated and plated canine femur calculated from in vivo strain measurements
Journal of Biomechanics
(1981) Implantation of strain gauges of long bone in vivo
Journal of Biomechanics
(1972)- et al.
Functional adaptation in long bones establishing in vivo values for surface remodelling rate coefficient
Journal of Biomechanics
(1985) - et al.
A minimal parametric model of the femur to describe axial elastic strain in response to loads
Medical Engineering and Physics
(1996) - Crowninshield, R.D., Brand, R.A., Johnston, R.C., Milroy, J.C., 1980. An analysis of femoral component stem design in...
Influence of muscle forces on the internal loading in the femur during gait
(1996)- et al.
Variability of femoral muscle attachments
Journal of Biomechanics
(1996)