Generalised residuals and heterogeneous duration models: With applications to the Weilbull model

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90073-9Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper deals with models for the duration of an event that are misspecified by the neglect of random multiplicative heterogeneity in the hazard function. This type of misspecification has been widely discussed in the literature [e.g., Heckman and Singer (1982), Lancaster and Nickell (1980)], but no study of its effect on maximum likelihood estimators has been given. This paper aims to provide such a study with particular reference to the Weibull regression model which is by far the most frequently used parametric model [e.g., Heckman and Borjas (1980), Lancaster (1979)]. In this paper we define generalised errors and residuals in the sense of Cox and Snell (1968, 1971) and show how their use materially simplifies the analysis of both true and misspecified duration models. We show that multiplicative heterogeneity in the hazard of the Weibull model has two errors in variables interpretations. We give the exact asymptotic inconsistency of M.L. estimation in the Weibull model and give a general expression for the inconsistency of M.L. estimators due to neglected heterogeneity for any duration model to O(σ2), where σ2 is the variance of the error term. We also discuss the information matrix test for neglected heterogeneity in duration models and consider its behaviour when σ2>0.

References (11)

  • A.D. Chesher

    Testing for neglected heterogeneity

    Econometrica

    (1984)
  • D.R. Cox

    Some remarks on overdispersion

    Biometrika

    (1983)
  • D.R. Cox et al.

    Theoretical statistics

    (1974)
  • D.R. Cox et al.

    A general definition of residuals

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B

    (1968)
  • J. Crowley et al.

    Covariance analysis of heart transplant survival data

    Journal of the American Statistical Society

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (70)

  • What makes growth sustained?

    2012, Journal of Development Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    This problem, which is a general affliction of this and related literatures, is not easy to solve. Abrevaya and Hausman (1999) and Lancaster (1985) show that hazard estimates using the Weibull distribution are consistent even with measurement error in the dependent variable. However, our setup does not meet the requirements for this result (most notably, it applies only to non-censored data).

  • Testing for unobserved heterogeneity in exponential and Weibull duration models

    2010, Journal of Econometrics
    Citation Excerpt :

    For this, Lancaster (1979) and Kalbfleisch and Prentice (1980) assume a conventional gamma distribution for the unobserved heterogeneity and test for its presence by measuring the variance of the gamma distribution. Chesher (1984) and Lancaster (1985) propose an information matrix (IM) test (White, 1982, 1994, ch. 11), as the information matrix equality holds in the absence of unobserved heterogeneity.

  • Intershopping duration: An analysis using multiweek data

    2004, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such factors may include inherent individual preferences, household responsibilities/interactions, and other miscellaneous unobserved determinants. It is well established now that failure to control for such unobserved heterogeneity can produce severe bias in the nature of duration dependence and the estimates of covariate effects (Heckman and Singer, 1984; Lancaster, 1985). Table 4 provides the segmentation model results for probabilistically assigning individuals into the erratic and regular shopper segments.

  • A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips

    2002, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such factors may include inherent individual preferences for certain departure times, household responsibilities/interactions not captured by the household variables included in the model, and other miscellaneous unobserved determinants. It is well established now that failure to control for unobserved heterogeneity can produce severe bias in the nature of duration dependence and the estimates of the covariate effects (Heckman and Singer, 1984; Lancaster, 1985). Table 3 shows the percentage variation in departure time hazard explained by unobserved heterogeneity for each of the six broad time periods in which the covariates and their effects are allowed to vary.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This paper is an extensive revision of one first circulated in 1978 under the title ‘The Effect Omitted Regressors on the Analysis of Unemployment Durations’. The author wishes to acknowledge the kind hospitality of the Department of Statistics, Australian National University, while he was revising the paper.

View full text