Short communication
Motor evoked potentials with magnetic stimulation: correlations with height

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(89)90039-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The relationship between height and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) was studied in 52 healthy young subjects. Evoked responses from the abductor digiti minimi and tibialis anterior muscles were obtained following magnetic stimulation over the vertex and the cervical and lumbar regions. The latencies of MEPs were highly correlated with height. The conduction time from the motor cortex to the lumbar region was also correlated with height, but that from the motor cortex to the cervical region was not. It is concluded that height is an important variable in defining the MEP normality.

Cited by (52)

  • Interhemispheric differences in time-frequency representation of motor evoked potentials in brain tumor patients

    2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    We hypothesize, that time-frequency results might be less prone to intra- and inter-subject co-variates and, thus, have a higher reliability and sensitivity for detecting disturbed corticospinal transmission. In fact, conventional time-series parameters have been shown to be susceptible to several individual factors (e.g., age, height, weight, AED intake) (Cantone et al., 2019; Chu, 1989; Jung et al., 2010; Sollmann et al., 2017; Tobimatsu et al., 1998). Time-frequency measures, however, were not affected by these co-variates in the present study.

  • Relationship Between Motor Function, DTI, and Neurophysiological Parameters in Patients with Stroke in the Recovery Rehabilitation unit

    2021, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    The F-wave latency was measured as the period from the stimulation to the onset of each F-wave, and the shortest latency was used for the analysis. The CMCT was calculated using the following formula:35-39 CMCT = MEP latency − (F-wave latency + M-wave latency − 1)/2

  • Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application: An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee

    2015, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In this method, CMCT includes the time taken for at least one synaptic delay and the time in proximal motor root in the spinal canal, in addition to the true CMCT (time needed for conduction in the CST) (Cowan et al., 1984; Mills and Murray, 1985; Hess et al., 1987; Rossini et al., 1987a; Ugawa et al., 1988a,b, 1989a, 1990). The second approach is the use of F-waves (Rossini et al., 1987a; Chu, 1989; Eisen and Shtybel, 1990; Claus, 1990). The F wave latency measures antidromic conduction in motor axons to the spinal motoneuronal pool, the “turn-around” time at the motoneuron pool (generally considered to be 1 ms) and then orthodromic conduction from the motoneuron pool to the muscle.

  • Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials in Great Danes with and without clinical signs of cervical spondylomyelopathy: Association with neurological findings and magnetic resonance imaging

    2014, Veterinary Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    A longer neuronal path length means that the impulse will need to travel a larger distance before reaching the muscle and generating a motor evoked potential; thus, yielding longer latencies. The influence of body size on TMMEP latencies has also been reported in humans and horses (Chu, 1989; Nollet et al., 2004). These results indicate that reference ranges for TMMEP latency will likely be different across dog breeds with different body sizes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text