The identification of behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ in early weaned piglets

doi:10.1016/0168-1591(92)90004-U

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volume 35, Issue 2, November 1992, Pages 135-147

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(92)90004-U Get rights and content

Abstract

An approach to identifying behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ is illustrated with early weaned piglets serving as an example. From a total of 39 behaviour patterns, ten were selected for further study because they were readily obvious, clearly defined, easily distinguished and relatively frequent. The ten patterns were tested using 256 piglets weaned at 4 weeks of age. The piglets were exposed to two different levels of environmental and social stressors: half of the piglets were placed in pens with eight littermates, had an area of 0.30 m² per piglet, and were given straw each day. The other half of the piglets were mixed with non-littermates, had 16 piglets in each pen with an area of 0.15 m² per piglet, and received no straw. Mixing, crowding and lack of straw have been shown by others to be related to physiological stress reactions. The occurence of belly-nosing, manipulating other piglets (whether directed at ears, tails or other parts), chewing the chain and sitting passive differed (P<0.001) between the treatments in Weeks 2 and 4 after weaning. It was concluded that these behaviour patterns, as well as play, are effective behavioural indicators of ‘stress’, induced by mixing with non-littermates, crowding and lack of straw, in early weaned piglets.

References (46)

M. Arnone et al.
Does frustration induce aggression in pigs?
Appl. Anim. Ethol.
(1980)
J.L. Barnett et al.
Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig
Appl. Anim. Ethol.
(1983)
J.L. Barnett et al.
The effects of pregnancy and parity number on behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare status of individual and group-housed pigs
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(1987)
A.K.K. Björk
Is social stress in pigs a detrimental factor to health and growth that can be avoided by amperozide treatment?
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(1989)
M.J. Bryant et al.
Effects of stocking rate upon the performance, general activity and ingestive behaviour of groups of growing pigs
Br. Vet. J.
(1974)
R. Ewbank et al.
Aggressive behaviour amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates
Anim. Behav.
(1972)
D. Fraser
Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth
Anim. Behav.
(1978)
D. Fraser et al.
The term “stress” in a veterinary context
Br. Vet. J.
(1975)
D. Fraser et al.
Water for piglets and lactating sows: quantity, quality and quandaries
D. Fraser et al.
Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs
Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.
(1991)

P.H. Hemsworth et al.

The influence of handling by humans on the behaviour, reproduction and corticosteroids of male and female pigs

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

(1986)

P.H. Hemsworth et al.

Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. II. Effects of space allowance

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

(1986)

P.H. Hemsworth et al.

The influence of inconsistent handling by humans on the behaviour, growth and corticosteroids of young pigs

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

(1987)

P. Jensen

An ethogram of social interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

(1980)

G.P. Pearce et al.

The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

(1989)

C.J.M. Scheepens et al.

Influences of intermittent daily draught on the behaviour of weaned pigs

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

(1991)

A. Warnier et al.

Effects of confinement upon behavioural hormonal responses and production indices in fattening pigs

P. Armitage et al.

R.H. Barnes et al.

Effect of postnatal dietary protein and energy restriction on exploratory behavior in young pigs

Dev. Psychobiol.

(1976)

D.A. Berry

Logarithmic transformation in ANOVA

Biometrics

(1987)

F. Blecha et al.

Effects of cold and weaning stressors on the antibody-mediated immune response of pigs

J. Anim. Sci.

(1981)

F. Blecha et al.

Immunologic reactions of pigs regrouped at or near weaning

Am. J. Vet. Res.

(1985)

N.E. Breslow et al.

Statistical Methods in Cancer Research

(1980)

Cited by (107)

Impact of two commercial weaning and transport strategies on piglet behaviour, body weight change, lesions and lameness following transport
2022, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Citation Excerpt :
Sitting was inconsistently observed between systems; a greater percentage of piglets were observed sitting in E pens during the live sample, but at T1b, piglets exposed to W system weaning and transport practices had a higher likelihood of being observed sitting than piglets exposed to E system weaning and transport practices, and no difference was observed between the system groups at T2. Sitting can indicate stress (Dybkjaer, 1992) or discomfort (Hicks et al., 1998) in pigs and has been used previously as a negative indicator of swine welfare in the farm setting (Cagienard et al., 2005) and during transport (Sutherland et al., 2010). Therefore, a small percentage of the animals observed from both systems were potentially in a state of discomfort or stress shortly following transport.
The impact of transport on weaned piglet welfare has been evaluated under experimental conditions, but data generated from studies conducted under commercial conditions and incorporating variation in time between weaning and transport are lacking. The purpose of this research was to describe the behaviour patterns, changes in weight and signs of injury observed in a subset of piglets from two Canadian commercial swine systems employing different weaning and transport practices. The Western system (W) weaned piglets up to six days prior to long (>30 h) transport, while the Eastern system (E) weaned piglets immediately prior to short (<3 h) transport. Four transport events for both systems were observed under summer conditions. Behaviour of the first pen of piglets placed after transport was recorded at arrival (T1a), while a subset of the transported piglets enrolled prior to transport (E: n = 200, W: n = 240) had weights collected, injury assessments completed, and behaviour video recorded on the day of arrival (T1b) and 3–4 days later (T2). A greater percentage of W piglets were observed feeding at T1a (35.8% vs 0.0%; P < 0.001), and piglets exposed to W system practices had a greater likelihood of being observed feeding compared to piglets exposed to E system practices at T1b (IRR: 9.2, 95% CI: 4.3–19.9, P < 0.001) and T2 (IRR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.8–2.4, P < 0.001). Similarly, a greater percentage of W piglets were observed drinking at T1a (13.9% vs 9.2%; P = 0.005) and piglets exposed to W system practices had a greater likelihood of being observed drinking at T1b (IRR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9, P = 0.001). Sitting was performed more by E piglets at T1a (P = 0.01), but piglets exposed to W system practices had a greater likelihood of being observed sitting at T1b (IRR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.4–4.6, P = 0.003). Eastern system piglets lay down more at T1a (20.0% vs 0.0%; P < 0.001) and piglets exposed to E system practices had a greater likelihood of being observed lying at T2 (IRR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.4–1.5, P < 0.001). Between T1b and T2, lesion severity (scratches, wounds) increased in E piglets compared to W piglets in the ear, skin and tail regions assessed, likely due to weaning timeline and associated aggression. This study observed impacts of both proximity to weaning and transport duration on piglet welfare indicators and supports further investigation of the interaction between weaning and transport departure times. Piglets undergoing long transport days after weaning may benefit from having access to feed and water during transport.
Environmentally enriched pigs have transcriptional profiles consistent with neuroprotective effects and reduced microglial activity
2018, Behavioural Brain Research
Environmental enrichment (EE) is widely used to study the effects of external factors on brain development, function and health in rodent models, but very little is known of the effects of EE on the brain in a large animal model such as the pig. Twenty-four young pigs (aged 5 weeks at start of study, 1:1 male: female ratio) were housed in environmentally enriched (EE) pens and provided with additional enrichment stimulation (a bag filled with straw) once daily. Litter, weight and sex matched controls n= (24) were housed in barren (B) conditions. Behaviour was recorded on alternate days from study day 10. After 21 days, RNA-sequencing of the frontal cortex of male piglets culled one hour after the enrichment stimulation, but not those at 4 h after stimulation, showed upregulation of genes involved in neuronal activity and synaptic plasticity in the EE compared to the B condition. This result is mirrored in the behavioural response to the stimulation which showed a peak in activity around the 1 h time-point. By contrast, EE piglets displayed a signature consistent with a relative decrease in microglial activity compared to those in the B condition. These results confirm those from rodents, suggesting that EE may also confer neuronal health benefits in large mammal models, through a potential relative reduction in neuroinflammatory process and increase in neuroprotection driven by an enrichment-induced increase in behavioural activity.
Can body nosing in artificially reared piglets be reduced by sucking and massaging dummies?
2018, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Selection for hyper-prolific sows has substantially increased litter size. Consequently, the number of piglets in a litter may exceed the number of functional teats. To solve this problem, surplus piglets may be removed from the sow 2 days after birth and raised artificially. However, these piglets show increased levels of oral behaviours, such as belly nosing, directed at other piglets. This behaviour resembles massaging and sucking at the sow’s udder and thus is considered to be redirected suckling behaviour. The present study investigated whether oral behaviour directed at piglets can be reduced in artificially reared piglets by providing them with sucking and massaging dummies. In a two-by-two between-group factorial design, the artificial rearing pens were equipped with one of four treatments: a sucking dummy, a massaging dummy, a combined sucking–massaging dummy, or no dummy. The behaviour of 126 piglets (in 21 groups of 6 piglets) was scored from video by continuous focal observation lasting 90 min per piglet each on days 4 and 18 after introduction to the artificial rearing system. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. Body nosing (composed of belly nosing and nosing on any other body part) increased from day 4 to 18 in all treatments, but piglets provided with a combined sucking–massaging dummy showed the smallest increase. Piglets spent more time nosing the combined dummy than the sucking or the massaging dummy. However, there was no causal inverse relationship between the duration of body nosing and dummy nosing. All but one piglet showed body nosing at least once. Resting, play-fighting, or oral manipulation of piglets (other than body nosing), dummies, and pen equipment were hardly affected by the treatments. Piglets with a combined dummy tended to have a longer average resting bout duration compared with piglets in other treatments. In conclusion, only the combined sucking–massaging dummy was effective in reducing the increase in body nosing over time. However, this reduction was rather small in absolute terms and the combined dummy did not prevent body nosing. The tested dummies were thus not successful in eliminating the redirected oral behaviour in artificially reared piglets.
To be blamed or pitied? The effect of illness on social behavior, cytokine levels and feed intake in undocked boars
2017, Physiology and Behavior
Tail biting is detrimental to animal welfare and has negative consequences for producer economy. Poor health is one of the risk factors for tail biting. The first aim of this study was therefore to test for links between health status and behavior related to tail biting at the individual level. The second aim of this study was to test whether variation in cytokines was related to variation in social behavior. These small molecules produced upon immune activation are known to influence behavior both in the direction of withdrawal and increased aggression. This could potentially increase non-functional social behavior and thereby the risk of a tail biting outbreak. To investigate this, we collected behavioral data, health data, feeding data and blood samples from undocked boars at a test station farm in Norway. We compared groups with three different diagnoses: osteochondrosis diagnosed by computer tomography scanning (OCSAN), osteochondrosis diagnosed by clinical examination (OCCLIN) and respiratory tract disease (RESP), with healthy controls (CTR). We tested whether the diagnoses were associated with feeding and growth, social behavior and cytokine levels. We then tested whether there were correlations between cytokine levels and social behavior. We also provide raw data on cytokine levels in the extended sample (N = 305) as there are few publications on cytokine levels measured in pigs living under commercial conditions. OCCLIN pigs visited the feeder less, and fed longer compared to CTR pigs. Pigs diagnosed with RESP showed a large drop in growth the first week after filming, which corresponds to the week they were likely to have been diagnosed with illness, and a tendency to compensatory increase in the week after that. Social behavior differed between experimental groups with OCSCAN pigs receiving more social behavior (both aggressive and non-aggressive) compared to CTR, and RESP pigs tending to perform more ear- and tail-biting than controls. There were no differences in absolute levels of cytokines between categories. However IL1-ra and IL-12 showed correlations with several behaviors that have been shown by others to be associated with current or future tail biting activity. To our knowledge, this is the first published study indicating a role for illness in non-functional social behavior in pigs and the first showing a correlation between cytokine levels and social behavior.
Hiding walls for fattening pigs: Do they affect behavior and performance?
2017, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
The prevalence of harmful and unwanted behavior in fattening pigs is influenced by different factors including housing. Housing may include the opportunity to hide from aggressive pen mates and this ability is related to pen design and shape. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a hiding wall in the pen on the behavior and performance of pigs during the entire fattening period (30–110 kg). A total of 383 pigs were spread over standard control pens without hiding opportunities, and treatment pens. In the latter pens, a hiding wall was constructed, consisting of two solid panels positioned in a “T” shape against the side or back wall of the pen. Behaviors using an extended ethogram, the presence of lesions and weight were recorded during the entire fattening period. The presence of a hiding wall influenced neither growth, nor the prevalence of most pen mate manipulations (based on behavioral observations), but it did affect the prevalence of belly nosing and manipulating pen fittings. A lower frequency of these behaviors was observed in pens with hiding walls, which might indicate a lower stress level. Severe ear lesions were recorded more frequently in pens with a hiding wall, while severe tail lesions were recorded more often in control pens. These contradictory results might be related to the fact that the hiding wall disturbed lying behavior in the pen and caused restricted access to the backside of the pen, due to its position. Consequently, ear lesions might have been caused by pigs trying to reach the back of the pen. Other aggressive behaviors were not affected, as both the frequency of fighting and head knocking were not influenced by the prevalence of a hiding wall, and the prevalence of lesions on the front region of the body did not differ between control and treatment pens. In conclusion, the hiding wall did not contribute to a lower frequency of aggressive behavior, but was associated with less tail lesions, and a lower frequency of pen manipulation and belly nosing. The latter results might indicate a lower stress-level in pens with hiding walls.
Improving welfare and production in the peri-weaning period: Effects of co-mingling and intermittent suckling on the stress response, performance, behaviour, and gastrointestinal tract carbohydrate absorption in young pigs
2017, Livestock Science
We investigated the effect of different pre-weaning interventions on performance, aspects of behaviour, and selected neuroendocrine, inflammatory and immune indices in 593 weanling pigs (59 litters, weaning age 22 ± 1.7). Measurements were taken at various time points two weeks before and after weaning. Sugar absorption tests (20% mannitol and 20% galactose solutions) were used to assess gastrointestinal tract (GIT) absorptive capacity. One week before weaning, litters were either co-mingled (CoM) for 8 h daily with another litter or not co-mingled (NoCoM). Half of the litters were also subjected to intermittent suckling (IS) involving separation from their sow for 8 h daily and the other half remained with their sow (NoIS). Hence, four treatments were produced in a 2×2 factorial design; (1) CoM IS (n = 16 litters), (2) CoM NoIS (n = 14 litters), (3) NoCoM IS (n = 16 litters), (4) NoCoM NoIS (n = 13 litters). Measurements are compared within each of the main effects (CoM or IS) unless otherwise stated. Acute weaning stress was evidenced by increases in cortisol, haptoglobin and N: L ratios when data were combined (P < 0.001). However, there were tendencies (P < 0.1) for lower cortisol in IS pigs and higher N: L ratios in CoM pigs at weaning. While CoM did not affect performance before weaning, growth (P < 0.05), feed intake (P < 0.05) and body weight (P < 0.05) were reduced in CoM pigs 7–14 days after weaning. One week of IS before weaning improved feed intake before weaning (P < 0.01), resulting in better growth (P = 0.01) and a tendency (P < 0.1) for a higher feed intake 2–7 days after weaning. Co-mingled piglets had more scratches 4 days before weaning (P < 0.001), but tended to have fewer scratches 2 days after weaning (P < 0.1). Pigs exposed to either IS or CoM displayed more sleeping behaviour the day after weaning (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). A higher mannitol absorption was evident in CoM NoIS pigs 3 days after weaning (P < 0.01), and galactose absorption was reduced in IS pigs 3 days before weaning (P < 0.05) and tended to be reduced 3 days after weaning (P < 0.1), likely reflecting a GIT adaptive response. Overall, despite improvements in mannitol absorption and behaviour, there was no beneficial effect of CoM on performance after weaning. Alternatively, IS improved behaviour and performance during the first week after weaning.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

The identification of behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ in early weaned piglets

Abstract

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Br. Vet. J.

Anim. Behav.

Anim. Behav.

Br. Vet. J.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.

Effect of postnatal dietary protein and energy restriction on exploratory behavior in young pigs

Dev. Psychobiol.

Logarithmic transformation in ANOVA

Biometrics

Effects of cold and weaning stressors on the antibody-mediated immune response of pigs

J. Anim. Sci.

Immunologic reactions of pigs regrouped at or near weaning

Am. J. Vet. Res.

Statistical Methods in Cancer Research