Nonmanipulability in two dimensions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(84)90059-3Get rights and content

Abstract

We prove that continuous, anonymous, strategyproof social choice functions in two dimensions forType I preferences are coordinatewise median functionsm(x1,…,x1,a1,…,an−1). These are efficient only if thea1 are ±∞ in equal numbers. For three or more dimensions, efficiency is not possible.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Truthful aggregation of budget proposals

    2021, Journal of Economic Theory
  • Monotonic norms and orthogonal issues in multidimensional voting

    2020, Journal of Economic Theory
    Citation Excerpt :

    We explain in Section 3.2 this discrepancy in terms of the different domains and focuses of the respective studies.15 For the Euclidean norm, Kim and Roush (1984) and Peters et al. (1992) connected the DIC property of marginal medians to orthogonal coordinate systems.16 An elegant result due to Peters et al. (1993) shows that marginal medians constitute DIC mechanisms for a general norm on the plane (i.e., when there are two dimensions) if and only if majority voting takes place along two directions that are BJ-mutually orthogonal (see Birkhoff, 1935, and James, 1947).17

  • Spatial implementation

    2015, Games and Economic Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    He establishes that the only rules which are efficient, anonymous, and strategy-proof select a “generalized” median of the announced peaks of the agents. Multi-dimensional extensions establish characterizations of coordinate-wise medians which hold even in the Euclidean case (see Border and Jordan, 1983; Kim and Roush, 1984; Barberà et al., 1993, 1998; Le Breton and Sen, 1999; Le Breton and Weymark, 1999; Bordes et al., 2012). Coordinate-wise medians are intuitive, but suffer from the drawback that the choice of coordinates determines the rule.

  • Strategyproof Social Choice

    2011, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare
  • Anonymous voting and minimal manipulability

    2007, Journal of Economic Theory
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text