Pooling cross-sections with unequal time-series lengths

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(85)90167-3Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper deals with the estimation of economic relationships using N cross-sectional units observed over periods of unequal lengths. A one-way error component model is assumed and the inverse of the variance-covariance matrix is derived. It is shown that GLS can be given a simple tractable WLS interpretation similar to that obtained for the complete panel data case. The basic difference, however, is that the incomplete panel data case has weights that are crucially dependent on the length of time-series available for each cross-section.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (45)

  • Heteroscedastic stratified two-way EC models of single equations and SUR systems

    2020, Econometrics and Statistics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several and different reasons, such as attrition or accretion, may produce an incomplete panel data set. Therefore, standard single-equation EC models have been extended to the econometric treatment of unbalanced panel data: Biørn (1981) and Baltagi (1985) discussed the single-equation one-way EC model, Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989) and Davis (2002) extended such estimation method to the two and multi-way cases. Although often discarded in empirical applications, a relevant issue in panel data estimation is heteroscedasticity, which often occurs when the sample is large and observations differ in “size characteristic” (i.e., the level of the variables).

  • Panel Data Analysis (Stationarity, Cointegration, and Causality)

    2019, Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): A Manual
  • Hausman-type tests for individual and time effects in the panel regression model with incomplete data

    2018, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recently, statistical modeling for incomplete panels has received more and more attention in both the theory and the application. The readers can refer to Baltagi (1985), Baltagi, Chang, and Li (1998), Baltagi, Song, and Jung (2002), Oya (2004), Shao, Xiao, and Xu (2011), Song and Jung (2001), Sosa-Escudero and Bera (2008), Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989), Yue, Li, and Zhang (2017), etc. Some of them focused on the estimation of parameter and the rest focused on the hypothesis test of the random effects.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text