Brief communication
Copulatory behavior of sexually naive and sexually experienced male rats following removal of the vomeronasal organ

https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(86)90215-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The question addressed was whether removal of the vomeronasal organ (VNO) of the male rat would produce observable deficits in sexual behavior. Both sexually naive and sexually experienced males were used and each animal was given more than 12 hours to mate with a receptive female. Although sexual arousal was depressed in both groups, and depressed more among naive than experienced animals, every male was eventually aroused by the receptive female and eventually ejaculated. We conclude that while the VNO contributes to arousal it is not indispensable for arousal.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (69)

  • Paced mating increases the expression of μ opioid receptors in the ventromedial hypothalamus of male rats

    2019, Behavioural Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Finally, both the olfactory epithelium and vomeronasal inputs are essential for the processing of chemosensory relevant olfactory cues that facilitate the expression of male sexual behavior [43]. After a lesion of the vomeronasal organ, males took longer to intromit and ejaculate than control animals [44,45] and after a lesion of the olfactory epithelium, Dhungel, et al. [35] reported a decrease in intromission frequency and an increase in ejaculation and mount latencies. Moreover, it was shown that both, the main and accessory olfactory systems are necessary for the activation of the medial AMY and preoptic neurons of male rats [32,35].

  • Male Sexual Behavior

    2017, Hormones, Brain and Behavior: Third Edition
  • Chemosignals and hormones in the neural control of mammalian sexual behavior

    2013, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although MOE damage does not influence copulation in Syrian hamsters (Powers and Winans, 1973), it does eliminate copulation in mice, independent of experience (Keller et al., 2006b; Mandiyan et al., 2005) and substantially reduces NCEs by male rats in response to volatile odors from females (Kondo et al., 1999). By contrast, VNO removal eliminates copulation in only 20–30% of male hamsters (Powers and Winans, 1975) but has minor effects (or even no effect: sexually-naïve mice (Pankevich et al., 2004)) in male rats and mice (Clancy et al., 1984; Saito and Moltz, 1986) and no effect in guinea pigs (Beauchamp et al., 1982). The lack of a pronounced copulatory deficits in male mice with VNO damage appears at odds with reports that genetic dysfunction of VNO promotes high levels of male mounting toward male conspecifics (Leypold et al., 2002; Stowers et al., 2002), suggesting that impairments of VNO function throughout early life (as with genetic manipulations) may be more disruptive than adult VNO removal (Pankevich et al., 2004) or that disorganization of VNO function is more deleterious to copulation than is outright removal of the VNO.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was supported in part by NIH Grant HD 06872 and by Biomedical Research Grant PH5 S07RR07029 to H.M.

2

On leave of absence from Toxicology Division, The Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Kodaira, Tokyo 187, Japan.

View full text