The incorporation of work hardening and redundant work in rod-drawing analyses

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(68)90039-8Get rights and content

Abstract

With few exceptions, metal deformation analyses employ a constant yield stress (rigid, perfectly plastic metal) which ignores strain hardening, or a “mean” yield stress which attempts to accommodate strain hardening in a simplified manner. Since strain hardening is of interest here, little reference will be made to a rigid, plastic type of behavior.

The first part of this paper demonstrates that the use of a mean yield stress underestimates the working loads (or stresses) needed to draw metal through conical dies as compared to those loads predicted by more “exact” analyses. In this context “exact” refers to those solutions obtained by incorporating the strain hardening relationship in the governing “force balance” differential equations prior to the integration of the said equations. It is shown, however, that the error introduced by the use of a mean yield stress is no more than some 8 per cent for conditions that typify actual practice. Since analyses of other metal-working processes, such as rolling and extrusion, employ the same sort of differential equation, it is felt that these results are applicable there also.

The second part of this paper shows that redundant work in rod drawing may be approached either from considerations of the mechanical properties that result after the metal is drawn or from considerations of the stress necessary to draw down the rod. Contrary to what is implied in the literature, it is shown that these two approaches lead to different interpretations of the “redundant work factor”. Relationships are given between the two for metals that are assumed to strain harden in certain simple ways.

References (25)

  • R.T. Shield

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (1955)
  • G.D.S. MacLellan

    J. Iron Steel Inst.

    (1948)
  • J.G. Wistreich

    Metall. Rev.

    (1958)
  • R. Hill et al.

    J. Iron Steel Inst.

    (1948)
  • P.W. Whitton

    J. Inst. Metals

    (1957–1958)
  • A.P. Green
  • G. Sachs

    Z. angew. Math. Mech.

    (1927)
  • F. Körber et al.

    Mitt. K.-Wilhelm-Inst. Eisenforsch, Düsseld.

    (1940)
  • E.A. Davis et al.

    J. appl. Mech.

    (1944)
  • H.G. Baron et al.

    J. Inst. Metals

    (1950–1951)
  • G. Sachs et al.
  • E. Voce

    J. Inst. Metals

    (1948)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Fracture behavior of twinning-induced plasticity steel during wire drawing

      2020, Journal of Materials Research and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the effective strain profiles were significantly different with RA per pass: the HR wire had better uniformity along the radial direction. This is in good agreement with previous studies [9,31]. Regardless of the pass schedule, the center area had the same effective strain theoretically calculated based on the nominal area reduction using Eq. (2), i.e., 0.26.

    • Conical pipe envelope formation process

      2003, Journal of Materials Processing Technology
    • A computational study of strain inhomogeneity in wire drawing

      1995, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
    • Geometry factor and redundancy effects in extrusion of rod

      1989, Journal of Mechanical Working Technology
    • On cropping and related processes

      1980, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text