Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 530, Issue 1, 15 October 1990, Pages 40-48
Brain Research

Sex, handedness, and the morphometry of cerebral asymmetries on magnetic resonance imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90655-UGet rights and content

Abstract

Cerebral morphometry of linear measurements and hemispheric, frontal, temporal and parietal areas on MRI of 104 normal adults was analyzed for sex and handedness and right-left differences. The right hemisphere was significantly larger across all groups, but the left frontal width and area was larger in left handers. MANOVA showed separate effects of hand and sex for linear measures; right-handers had larger right anterior frontal, and left parietal and occipital widths. Ratios of L-R/L+R eliminated sex differences related to overall brain size however, a significant sex-by-hand interaction was shown by the parietal area ratios, indicating larger left side in right-handed males and left-handed females. A 3-dimensional ‘torque’ was postulated, where the upper and rostral portions of the hemispheres were larger on the right and the lower and caudal parts equal, or slightly larger on the left. The relationship of anatomical asymmetries, sex and handedness is multi-dimensional, and may explain some of the variability of normal cognitive functions and deficits after brain damage.

References (38)

  • ChuiH.C. et al.

    Human cerebral asymmetries evaluated by computerized tomography

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr.

    (1980)
  • 6

    External Morphology of the Primate Brain

    (1950)
  • CunninghamD.J.

    Contribution to the Surface Anatomy of the Cerebral Hemispheres

    (1892)
  • De LacosteC. et al.

    Intra- and interhemispheric asymmetries in the human brain

    Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.

    (1982)
  • DoyleF.H. et al.

    Imaging of the brain by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

    Lancet

    (1981)
  • FalziG. et al.

    Right-left asymmetry in anterior speech region

    Arch. Neurol.

    (1982)
  • GalaburdaA.M.

    La re´gion de Broca: observations anatomiques faites un sie`cle apre`s la mort de son decouvreur

    Rev. Neurol.

    (1980)
  • GeschwindN. et al.

    Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region

    Science

    (1968)
  • GlickS.D.

    Cerebral Lateralization in Non human Species

    (1985)
  • Cited by (109)

    • Neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: Pitfalls and promise

      2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another, different measure of global brain anatomy concerns its global asymmetry. Asymmetries in width and volume of the frontal and occipital poles have been documented in the general population, with the right frontal pole typically being larger than the left, while the opposite applies to the occipital pole (Galaburda et al., 1978; Kertesz et al., 1990; LeMay, 1976; Watkins et al., 2001). Some differences between dyslexic and control individuals have been reported, especially in the occipital pole, found to be either rightward asymmetrical or symmetrical in at least a subsample of the dyslexic population (Duara et al., 1991; Haslam et al., 1981; Hier et al., 1978).

    • Brain asymmetries and handedness in the specimens from the Sima de los Huesos site (Atapuerca, Spain)

      2017, Quaternary International
      Citation Excerpt :

      LeMay offers conclusions of some modern CT studies that have shown a statistical correlation between handedness and protrusion of the occipital bone (occipital petalia), protrusion of the frontal bone (frontal petalia), and the transverse dimensions (widths) of the frontal and posterior portions of the hemispheres (LeMay, 1976; LeMay and Geschwind, 1978; LeMay and Kido, 1978; Bear et al., 1986). In this respect, Amunts et al. (2000) states that, although several studies have demonstrated that anatomical asymmetries in the sizes of the frontal and occipital lobes (Galaburda et al., 1978; LeMay and Kido, 1978; Weinberger et al., 1982; Bear et al., 1986; Kertesz et al., 1990) and the anterior speech region (Galaburda, 1980; Falzi et al., 1982; Amunts et al., 1999) are correlated with handedness, none of them pinpoints a neurobiological substrate of handedness. Steele (2000) also affirms that human handedness bears some relationship to cerebral asymmetry even at the gross morphological level detectable in dry skulls, but the relationship as it is presently understood is quite weak and possibly complicated by inter-population contrasts in the incidence of cerebral asymmetry.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text