Treatment of pica in an adult disabled by autism by differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(87)90012-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The usefulness of diffential reinforcement of incompatible behavior was examined in the treatment of pica in a young man severely disabled by autism in a nonsheltered place of employment. The results indicated that a reduction in pica could be achieved by differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). Behaviors which were reinforced included remaining in his assigned location, keeping his hands on his work, working quickly and keeping his mouth clear. Reinforcements included favorite drinks, snacks, activities and praise. Treatment procedures were implemented by direct care paraprofessional staff. Withdrawal of treatment resulted in an increase inpica, with renewed reduction on reinstatement of the reinforcement schedule.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • The relationship between derived mutually entailed relations and the function of challenging behavior in children with autism: Comparing the PEAK-E-PA and the QABF

    2017, Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Approaches to problem behavior reduction typically involve (a) identifying or teaching an appropriate alterative behavior (e.g., a communicative behavior) that serves the same function as the challenging behavior, and (b) differentially providing access to the maintaining consequence contingent upon the appropriate alternative behavior rather than the challenging behavior. Some common treatment procedures include functional communication training (FCT; e.g., Carr & Durand, 1985; Durand & Carr, 1991; Tiger, Hanley, & Bruzek, 2008), differential reinforcement of alternative or incompatible behaviors (DRA/DRI; e.g., Chowdhury & Benson, 2011; Smith, 1987; Vollmer & Iwata, 1992), and non-contingent reinforcement strategies (NCR; e.g., Carr et al., 2000; Carr, Severtson, & Lepper, 2009; Wilder, Normand, & Atwell, 2005). Such an approach to understanding and treating challenging behaviors exhibited by individuals with autism, however, may be limited in application once individuals begin to acquire meaningful language.

  • Pica in persons with developmental disabilities: Approaches to treatment

    2013, Research in Developmental Disabilities
    Citation Excerpt :

    DRI was also used by Donnelly and Olczak (1990) for cigarette pica of two adults with ID. They also reported positive effects similar to Smith (1987). Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) has also been used for cigarette pica.

  • Assessment, behavioral treatment, and prevention of pica: Clinical guidelines and recommendations for practitioners

    2012, Research in Developmental Disabilities
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the treatment of pica, however, no studies show that DRA alone produces reductions near zero rate and over a 24-h period for 7 days a week. Smith (1987), for example, described the reduction of pica displayed by a 23-year-old male with autism and a profound intellectual disability following differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors (DRI). The rate of pica at the end of treatment was 3.7 per day, still a high rate of pica in a clinical setting.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text