l-Proline transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(82)90223-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Transport of l-proline into Saccharomyces cerevisiae K is mediated by two systems, one with a KT of 31 μM and Jmax of 40 nmol · s−1 · (g dry wt.)−1, the other with KT > 2.5 mM and Jmax of 150–165 nmol · s−1 · (g dry wt.)−1, The kinetic properties of the high-affinity system were studied in detail. It proved to be highly specific, the only potent competitive inhibitors being (i) l-proline and its analogs l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, sarcosine, d-proline and 3,4-dehydro-dl-proline, and (ii) l-alanine. The other amino acids tested behaved as noncompetitive inhibitors. The high-affinity system is active, has a sharp pH optimum at 5.8–5.9 and, in an Arrhenius plot, exhibits two inflection points at 15°C and 20–21°C. It is trans-inhibited by most amino acids (but probably only the natural substrates act in a trans-noncompetitive manner) and its activity depends to a considerable extent on growth conditions. In cells grown in a rich medium with yeast extract maximum activity is attained during the stationary phase, on a poor medium it is maximal during the early exponential phase. Some 50–60% of accumulated l-proline can leave cells in 90 min (and more if washing is done repeatedly), the efflux being insensitive to 0.5 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol and uranyl ions, to pH between 3 and 7.3, as well as to the presence of 10–100 mM unlabeled l-proline in the outside medium. Its rate and extent are increased by 1% d-glucose and by 10 μg nystatin per ml.

References (26)

  • M. Grenson et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1966)
  • M. Grenson

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1966)
  • J. Gits et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1967)
  • K. Ring et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1970)
  • M.L. Pall et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1971)
  • D.R. Hunter et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1971)
  • D.R. Hunter et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1973)
  • A. Kotyk et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1972)
  • N. Magaña-Schwencke et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1969)
  • A. Kotyk et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1982)
  • J. Ahlers

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1981)
  • J. Horák et al.

    Exp. Mycol.

    (1977)
  • P. Overath et al.

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1976)
  • Cited by (21)

    • The Aspergillus nidulans proline permease as a model for understanding the factors determining substrate binding and specificity of fungal amino acid transporters

      2015, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      More precisely, we provide further evidence that residues Gly56 and Thr57 of TMS1 contribute to substrate binding and also identify new substrate interacting residues in TMS3 (Glu138), TMS6 (Phe248), TMS8 (Trp351), and TMS10 (Thr414). Moreover, we show that PrnB is a highly specific l-proline transporter compared with Put4p, which is also known to transport l-alanine, glycine, GABA, and the toxic proline analog l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZC) (32–37). Taking advantage of the high primary sequence similarity and the specificity differences of PrnB and Put4p, we identify residues in TMSs 3 (Ser130), 6 (Phe252 and Ser253), 8 (Trp351), and 10 (Thr414) that contribute to the determination of the specificity profile of proline transporters.

    • Yeast nutrient transporters

      1997, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on Biomembranes
    • Amino acid transport in eucaryotic microorganisms

      1986, BBA - Reviews on Biomembranes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text